RE: Preliminary Announcement of Proposals for Feeless SWAP & Hive Onboarding
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I bought into the game as the concept is good but I can't support this proposal in its current form.
I don't believe in heavily funding any project that has not gotten itself operational first as there is no reason to believe that pumping money into a project will do any good when they have not managed to build a working concept by themselves first.
I would be happy to support an expansion of the work once we see a working model that needs more resources and I like the plan behind creating more accounts and bridging chains which would be worth funding.
3m for creating accounts is madness in my opinion as they can be created for free with resource credits or as part of the buy in for new players like splinterlands have with their spellbook.
Crypto has too many failed promises for me to support giving away money to a project that hasn't shown us anything other than a couple of promos.
I love the concept and like many others have bought assets in advance which should provide the funds to get the game off the ground but there needs to be more to ask for this kind of money from the community.
Also the team is looking for money to power up hive if I'm reading that right? Surely the project should be buying up hive from their sales to run the game. That is the whole point of the hive system to me. Projects power up funds to run their projects and provide the resources for their users. This is how they support the system.
I need to see more from the team and more development. I am hoping that it's a massive success and that you can get help from the community when the time is right but it's not there yet for me.
This is a preliminary announcement of 11 proposals and respect your opinion.
The funding is for the creation tickets and to hire existing Hive Developers to build bridges we want to keep feeless as Hive is to bring the masses in numbers the current games here combined have not seen.
Can't agree more as the game development is funded as well as much more and we are just trying to spend more on marketing than spending millions on account creation tickets, we are not in the model of passing off the charge to gamers as we market to those who play free first then buy/rent upgrades(NFTs) later, we have a marketing plan that will blow your mind we will post soon. As for the bridges the funding helps us keep it feeless until the game takes off and could fund that and much more.
The RC required to do the type of onboarding we are planning would be impossible for us to reach nor do we plan to make gamers pay to play our game with a spellbook type purchase, not all will want to play for rewards and we will leave no gamers out. 3m is what 1 million creation tickets cots and we are giving this proposal 275 days to earn your votes on it whether a yes or no.
Respect your opinion, if you read into the post we are primarily hunting for strong Hive Developers and do not mind funding all this on our own, will just be much slower than we hope.
Another opinion that is respected sir and I can't agree more which is why the big proposal is 275 days and the others are just to pay current Hive Developers to build Bridges for all of Hive with no fees.
If you look closer we did announce the allocations of NFT land sales and @psyberx has been powering up HIVE.
This is a preliminary proposal and in a week we do hope to begin the Bridge to ETH development as well as a few weeks from giving out some new developer gameplay video wich should have no Unity assets, will confirm.
I believe this is not a proposal itself, just asking for support, and also think that is why why they will broken down into several different ones. Can show proof of pudding as work gets done and things are accounted for. Bridging the chains will be a huge feature!
Couldn't agree more. This is a preliminary announcement of proposals, not one large proposal itself.
The nice thing about having this list of proposals in the open is that it gives people like @niallon11 exactly what he's asking for, in my opinion, while he's asking for it. This is a marketing plan in the form of, "Let's show you what we're planning" and "We'll be asking for your help for these things very soon."
That's much different than submitting one proposal, getting it funded, fulfilling the project, then asking for another, and another, and another...instead, this is more like a roadmap and I am so grateful for @psyberx laying it out there in true transparency of their intentions moving forward. There's nothing hidden here that I can see and look forward to seeing the proposals so I can vote on them individually. I like the plan, guys! Keep it coming!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
!LUV
i agree sounds unsustainable.
But that was also a reason I dumped my tokens (1M).
After I ask " why not sell starter packs with some level tokens for constant demand" I got some weird answers.
It doesn't mean idea is bad, but looks to me "sell tokens" "sell NFT" "start proposal" and so on.
Remember Dlive?
yup.