RE: Community communication of the code

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I mean to get a return that doesn't require voting, but doesn't allow for governance decisions.

Well, then stake stored in the saving account is perfect for that. Since it wouldn't have influence in any of both.

or do you propose increasing the percentage of interest that comes from the inflation pool?

Yeah pretty much that. Basically allocate inflation away from the rewards pool and into the saving accounts would be enough.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

Yeah pretty much that. Basically allocate inflation away from the rewards pool and into the saving accounts would be enough.

How much, considering that average voting would get quite decent returns, far above the current interest rate. To be effective to discourage poor voting, it would have to be able to compete with the gains from poor voting behavior.

0
0
0.000
avatar

How much, considering that average voting would get quite decent returns, far above the current interest rate.

Well, that's an entire different matter to let to be solved by the math geniuses here with some vestige of moral, fairness and ethics. Although obviously, submitted to the general consensus of the entire community. };)

But I guess my initial suggestion was more on the lines to end once and for all the ongoing discussions and the whining of the biggest stakeholders about the imminent need to have to reduce the powerdown period more than anything.

0
0
0.000