RE: The Myths and Legends of Modern Materialistic Science.

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Well, that is why most do add "under certain kinds of conditions". Outside those conditions, the theories are rendered nonsense. Also, I think the way theories are unraveled differs by the grades or positions of the students.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

The scientific method states. Make theory, test theory. If you find the theory doesn't hold against any test, then back to the start.

So, in school they should say "The debunked Theory of Relativity" whenever talking about Einstein's works.
Just like what we do when talking about Newtons Equations.

But they do not, and instead defend the Theory to the death.

And spoiler, the Electric Universe Model is far superior, and replaces everything in our Modern Science Textbooks. Or, our Modern Materialistic Science Textbooks are at equal stance with paper weights.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, in school they should say "The debunked Theory of Relativity" whenever talking about Einstein's works.

Exactly.. but you know some of our teachers do not even upgrade themselves in learning up-to-date information. Also, the textbooks (learning materials) which are used are not constantly upgraded.. even if they were, it would still take some time before they will reach the final consumer of such.

0
0
0.000