RE: Science Shows COVID19 Vaccines May Increase Transmission & Drive Variants. Cases Often Increase After Vaccine Drives.
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Correlation does not equal causation. IF the different vaccines for covid-19 do indeed not prevent transmission it still needs to be proven that they are in fact driving evolution of more virulent strains. Showing a graph with some correlation does not prove anything. That is statistics 101.
What the numbers show is that 99% of unvaccinated acount for the majority of the people that need hospitalization so it is still better to get the shot.
0
0
0.000
I'm not sure if you read the study I quoted here or not, but it is saying that the leaky vaccines tend to increase transmission to unvaccinated people, so your last point is missing the point entirely. We can also look at how it seems to be the case that people who have been vaccinated in the US and who contract COVID after being vaccinated are not being included as COVID cases (recent change in rules) - plus, I think it's correct that in some regions, people who die after having had a single vaccine are being recorded as unvaccinated deaths. So you can see how the statistics are grossly distorted in numerous ways.
I did not state anywhere that this study proves the causation involved - it is meant to fuel further questioning and research that is direly needed.
You mentioned that the article that you where quoting failed to find proof that vaccination drove the evolution of the virus that they were studying. In your own words:
In other words, you are taking an inconclusive result of a different vaccine type (for a different virus) and interpreting it to mean that taking a vaccine for COVID-19 is possibly dangerous. Your logic is just not solid.
Any medical procedure (that includes vaccination) has risks and benefits. So far I have not seen any peer reviewed study that proves that the risks of vaccinating for covid outwheigh the benefits.
There is no doubt from the data that the risk of vaccinating children and teenagers for COVID outweighs the possible benefit them. The risk of child mortality is tiny and the risk of injury is higher. This is not my opinion, rather it is from official data published by the UK government. Here's a breakdown from the US on this topic:
There are numerous qualified specialists concluding that this study and other data suggests strongly that the patterns seen in 90 countries, where cases rise after vaccination rollouts is something to be alarmed by. This is what I am saying. It is a totally reasonable observation and I find it strange that no-one who is criticising this post has even commented on the glaring data that shows the cases rise after vaccination rollouts.
The nature of the logic used in this study may or may not be accurate. It is open to interpretation to some extent, I agree. In conjunction with the data observed from the COVID vaccine rollouts, this study is something to take into consideration. I have never said 'YOU MUST BELIEVE EVERYTHING I SAY AND TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION NOW'.. I am sharing information that you can do what you want with. I stand by the observation, as do the vast majority of people I have met, that this information is important to bare in mind.
That is good data, are there any similar studies comparing the numbers to the other vaccines for covid (not just the Pfizer vaccine)?