RE: The Memory of Water: Pseudoscience or not?
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Quantum mechanics and the role of consciousness (in fact of the observers) are topics that are still debated today, so that alternative (i.e. not mainstream) interpretations of quantum mechanics are still viable (many of them are now discarded, but others are still not contradicted by data). I have wrote a bit about this in my book (that is being now translated in English).
I am not sure to be full straight into the discussion... So sorry about that. I unfortunately have not much time to read any post and thread those days... Feel free to make a short summary (@gentleshaid or @juecoree) and I will answer (please mention me!).
0
0
0.000
@lemouth, appreciate your response. It just came up with our discussion that some of the pseudoscience may have some validity unless it relates with quantum concepts. Its about topic on matter and consciousness.
Nothing much to worry about this:
@getleshaid suggested that you may have some insight on quantum physics, matter and consciousness. We just have a discussion on pseudoscience and how quantum can explain these claims.
Haha OK I see. My insights are more or less explained above. I would say "observer" rather than consciouness in fact. However, many experiments are now operated without any real human interaction (i.e. the computer does it all). Anyways, all of this belong to the quite questionable (and questioned) part of quantum mechanics, even today. I hope this clarifies at least my point!
Thank you for the response, @lemouth.