The Memory of Water: Pseudoscience or not?

in StemSocial2 months ago (edited)

Ice crystals structures from Masaru Emoto's expirement. stackexchage, CC

Words change molecules of water. I came across this bold claim in the inspirational book I was reading. Masaru Emoto claims that the molecular structure of water changes when exposed to our words. If Emoto was right, he found a phenomenon that has real implications. The human body has about 75% water. The findings, if true, can change our perspective about the human body.

Emoto's experiments involve exposing water to words, pictures, or music. Afterward, he freezes it to observe under the microscope. Emoto claims that beautiful crystals come out from beautiful words while negative words have ugly crystals. There are many factors in forming water crystals, such as the rate of cooling and air pressure.

I was skeptical about his findings. I searched for feedback from the scientific community, and I found out he received criticisms. He did not disclose details about his experiment, and some argue if he has sufficient experimental control conditions. A blind study claims they failed to show the phenomena. He published his finding in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, which caters to fringe science.

There is no doubt about Emoto's sincerity, but his work has all fingers pointing to pseudoscience. Emoto failed to give concrete and measurable proof of his experiments. His research raises more questions than answers. After reading about Emoto's work, I asked myself, "Can words change or affect water?". Does science have a say about water memory and consciousness?

Water and Rice Experiment

Home expirement of Masaru Emoto's claim. wikimedia

Masaru Emoto gains international attention with the unconventional experiment. The experiment yields him to conclude that human thoughts affect matter. He photographed ice and observe the different crystal structures. Each of the ice is from the water bottles that he labeled with caring and curse words or phrases. The ice with caring words forms geometric and aesthetic crystals, while those with curse words are chaotic and disoriented. His findings are groundbreaking but have too much grayscale.

Emoto did another experiment with rice. There are three jars with rice that has different labels. He wrote: "I love you" on the first, "You're an idiot." and ignore the last. He left the jars close for a month. After a month, the first jar became sour while the other jars developed molds. He concluded that his thoughts affect its fermentation.

The experiment makes rounds on the internet. Many believe it, but you know, anything can cause it, such as fungi or bacteria. I tried to look more into it, but I think the scientific community would not bother. The fermentation may be due to yeast in the rice or temperature changes rather than words or thoughts. For the molds, fungi may cause it. There are many factors to consider for the rice to ferment and get molds.

Janae Devika and Glenda Christiaens debunk the claims of Emoto as its experiment results in no measured difference from the three jars. Like the rice experiment, Emoto's water experiment suffer the same fate. The scientific community quickly debunked his claims due to a lack of experimental control and replicability.

Water Memory

Ice Crystals structure. wikimedia

Emoto's experiment leads us to speculate that our thoughts can affect objects. His findings are extraordinary, but he failed to show measurable proof in a controlled environment. He claims that water has a memory. In 2015, a team of scientists from the Max Planck Institute proved water indeed has a memory. They claimed that water is not a continuum; hence it has local memory-enabling structures.

The idea of water memory started at Jacques Benveniste in the late 1980s. Benveniste claims that water molecules are biologically active. We can still find the original DNA of a substance even after diluted. Nobel laureate Dr. Montagnier, who discovered HIV, published a paper on DNA waves and water. He received many criticisms on his work on water consciousness.

Professor Bernard Kroplin found a way to make structures of water visible. He applied drops of water in a glass slide and observed it under a dark field microscope. He observed that some students produced consistent images. He showed a flower and a salad image that remained in the water after immersed in it. Mainstream science considers his work a pseudoscience.

In 2008, Emoto conducted a water blessing ceremony in Lake Baikal, the world's deepest and oldest freshwater lake, to observe changes. He used the GVD sensors method of Professor Konstatin Korovov, a Russian scientist, to measure changes in Lake Baikal during the ceremony. The experiment results indicate a distinct difference in the stages of the ceremony.


Mainstream science ridicules the experiments and finding for water memory and consciousness. They always equate it as pseudoscience. At some point in my reading, I personally skeptical of these claims. All clues are pointing to pseudoscience. As I dig deeper into the subject, I realized that there are facts and proofs for these claims.

The water has a memory as supported by the paper of Kotlin and a researcher from the Max Planck Institute. Water retains some DNA of the substance even after diluted. Kotlin showed an image of a flower in the water structure after immersed in it. Emoto's finding is borderline pseudoscience. His experiments lacked relevant control conditions.

If water has memory, does other matter has it? If it does have a memory, can we affect it through our thoughts or words? These are open questions I want to have answers in the future. These questions can change our understanding of matter and consciousness.


  1. The pseudoscience of creating beautiful (or ugly) water
  2. The Effects of Spoken and Written Words on the Fermentation and Decomposition Process of Rice
  3. Debunking the rice expirement
  4. The Curious Study of Water Consciousness
  5. Double-Blind Test of the Effects of Distant Intention on Water Crystal Formation
  6. Effects of Distant Intention on Water Crystal Formation: A Triple-Blind Replication
  7. The structural memory of water persists on a picosecond timescale
  8. Icy claim that water has memory
  9. The history of the Memory of Water
  10. The Controversy Over the “Memory of Water”
  11. DNA waves and water
  12. The memory of water
  13. Properties of Water – Does Water Have Memory or Consciousness?
  14. The memory of water is a reality
  15. Water Memory, What a Memory
  16. Study Shows Water Has Memory. German Scientists Expand On Dr. Emoto’s Work

Amazing. Lemme get a jar of water and start cursing at it. LOL

That is the same response I had when I first encounter it. LOL.

Damn this is so interesting - anything psuedoscience is my bag because it generally means our understanding of something can't figure it out (without sounding like Fox Mulder) but its a shame its not accepted, because then the funding isnt there to discover the TRUTH!

Anything pseudoscience have extraordinary claim. I don't know why mainstream science did not pursue any digging to it. The either too skeptical about it or afraid to dig because it is too unknown. The borderline between science and pseudoscience is thin. In old time, Copernicus theory about sun as the center of our solar system was deemed too as pseudoscience. Today, it is fact. I think time could only tell if this is science or pseudoscience.

Couldn't of put it better myself!

Well, it is of course a pseudoscience, but I think that doesn't sounds too crazy what he wants to proove. Everything is energy, vibrations, particles, etc. If you can modify somehow that "internal energy" you could get some particular effects.

But I'm not a physicist, so I don't know if what I'm saying its right.

And our thoughs may have a similar effect on the body. I don't know if it is a pseudoscience too, but more and more I hear that most of the diseases are of emotional or mental origin.

I agree. Some parts are pseudoscience, but it is peculiar in a sense that it talks about energy, vibration, and consciousness. I think it is bound with quantum concept.

I think you have a point about internal energy. If we go my einstiens famous equation, we can some how relate energy and mass of an object. Also, considering each object has its owb natural frequency. If thought has mass, it could be possible. But it still borderline Pseudoscience.

I have also read that consciousness could be another state of matter. And quantum physics could also play a role in all this.

I agree. We are still discovering quantum to date. We have not fully understood it. Quantum physics may answer some of this peculiar science.

Yes, quantum theory could bring new discoverys. I think thoughs might be more related to quantum theory than a mass itself. Now that I think about it, Einstein equation is peculiar, I could calculate my energy using my weight.

Perhaps you all might want to bring @lemouth into this.

@gentleshaid. that is a good idea.

 2 months ago (edited)

Quantum mechanics and the role of consciousness (in fact of the observers) are topics that are still debated today, so that alternative (i.e. not mainstream) interpretations of quantum mechanics are still viable (many of them are now discarded, but others are still not contradicted by data). I have wrote a bit about this in my book (that is being now translated in English).

I am not sure to be full straight into the discussion... So sorry about that. I unfortunately have not much time to read any post and thread those days... Feel free to make a short summary (@gentleshaid or @juecoree) and I will answer (please mention me!).

@lemouth, appreciate your response. It just came up with our discussion that some of the pseudoscience may have some validity unless it relates with quantum concepts. Its about topic on matter and consciousness.

Nothing much to worry about this:

I am not sure to be full straight into the discussion... So sorry about that. I unfortunately have not much time to read any post and thread those days

@getleshaid suggested that you may have some insight on quantum physics, matter and consciousness. We just have a discussion on pseudoscience and how quantum can explain these claims.

The experiments simply failed the scientific method test and the findings cannot stand among the scientific community. I've watched a couple of similar experiments on YouTube but not for once was I convinced. Pseudoscientific at best

I did watch some videos about it. The home experiments lacks control conditions to be replicated. And every video had different result. I think there are other factors than words affect it.

I'll play devil's advocate here. What "control conditions" would the experiment need? I guess I could do the experiment myself but if the results turn to be inconclusive then it wont get much attention.

Maybe its time to isolate the Covid virus instead.

Yay! 🤗
Your post has been boosted with Ecency Points.
Continue earning Points just by using, every action is rewarded (being online, posting, commenting, reblog, vote and more).

Support Ecency, check our proposal:
Hivesigner: Vote for Proposal

Great work! Your post was selected for curation by one of @curangel's dedicated curators for its contribution to quality!

...unfortunately, it had to be excluded from curation because of the use of a service ( to liquify rewards.Our upvotes are reserved for content which is created with a commitment to long term growth and decentralization of Hive Power.

This exclusion only applies to this and eventually other future liquified posts and not all your publications in general.

Take care and hive five!

Thank you for appreciation! No worries. I am also committed for long term hive power, but I choose to have some flexible options when I have to power up. Hive five!

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider supporting our funding proposal, approving our witness (@stem.witness) or delegating to the @stemsocial account (for some ROI).

Please consider using the STEMsocial app app and including @stemsocial as a beneficiary to get a stronger support. 

Points Boosting refund to @juecoree! 🤓
Due to one of these reasons:
1. Post is not published via Ecency.
2. Post is already curated by our team.
3. Post is not curated by our curators within 24 hours.
4. Post might be too old post, try more recent content.
5. Author already received vote in last few hours, try again later.
Install Android:, iOS: mobile app or desktop app for Windows, Mac, Linux:
Learn more:
Join our discord: