RE: Important Change to STEMGeeks being considered

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

A fine idea! 25% seems fine. Other communities have used this to some success. But I should warn you the expected outcome is to burn more tokens, probably not get more users to the site....

I could be wrong, but I think you will need to go beyond nitrous to make that dream come true. I switched the URL to peakd just to make this comment.

With that said, I think its a really positive change!

hive-167922
0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

I should warn you the expected outcome is to burn more tokens, probably not get more users to the site....

I would only use the tokes in one of two ways.

  • Burn
  • Distribute as bonuses to those who use the site

I am more in favor of burning as the gap would already give more rewards to those who use the site and I have a large bounty account for prizes and other development.

I could be wrong, but I think you will need to go beyond nitrous to make that dream come true.

I am looking at moving off Nitrous at some point if we see our user counts go up.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

If the ad model will prove successful, personally I think the decision to compete on front-end level might be missing where the innovations of community tokens are coming from.

I am very interested in how the space develops moving forward, and I do think STEMgeeks will have a chance to make a play for some eyeballs looking for better, less censored content.

0
0
0.000
Reply