Dreem-wotw: Entropy In Communication

Entropy is a bit of a buzzword in modern science. It is often associated with "disorderliness". Even though it's much more interesting than this, I'll focus my article on the disorderliness in communication between two people i.e the entropy in communication. Before I dive in into this properly, here is how entropy came about;
The first hint of entropy was given by Lazare Carnot. He was notable for his work studying engines and leading the French revolutionary armies. He was more interested in the work put into a system than the work that comes out of it and he called the output "useful work" and named the lost work "transformation energy" which became entropy in the later run.

The word "Entropy" is used in various fields of study and is used unrelated to another and that's exactly what I'll be doing, crafting my own meaning of entropy to fit the aspect of communication. Just like Lazare Carnot would fit his work into useful and transforming, I'll try to fit the word Entropy in the area of disorderliness in communication. The bridge in communication and the disorderliness that can result if communication is altered in the process of transferring it. Does entropy fit here? Not sure but disorder can happen anywhere.

Photo Source

Ten people were lined up separated some meters from each other. A message was whispered to the first person and he was asked to tell the same message to the next person while it continued in that sequence. Before it got to the tenth person, the initial message that was given changed entirely and the last person couldn't even understand the message that was given to him. The output of a communication is often based on the effectiveness of the medium to which it was communicated and the comprehensive level of the receiver. If there's a disorder in any of these, then the output may be incongruous. An individual can pass misleading information if there was an entropy in how it was passed.

Five people can read a text and have five different meanings to it. Only the writer has a true interpretation of it. So many things influence a communication just as entropy is either influenced by an external force or whether it's high or low. Our environment, exposure, culture, belief,etc. are things that can influence the way we comprehend information.
Entropy might have been discussed only in science and in laws of thermodynamics but it can be applicable to every area of life, like I just did.



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar

Congratulations @dwixer! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You published more than 1200 posts.
Your next target is to reach 1300 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out our last posts:

Hive Power Up Day - July 1st 2023
Announcing the Travel Reimbursement Fund for HiveFest⁸
0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support. 
 

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed, entropy is so familiar with STEM, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. And it is something that reflects chaos in a system. Agreed with you my dear friend. Have a nice time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for concurring with my opinion

0
0
0.000
avatar

Truly, we don't have the same interception when a word is heard. Some may see it this way and others another way.

That's what makes us human.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You explained it well with regards to the example you gave.

Five people can read a text and have five different meanings to it. Only the writer has a true interpretation of it

You got me thinking about Bible. Many people with different interpretation

0
0
0.000