RE: Important Change to STEMGeeks being considered
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
well, first of all, thanks for all the work put into StemGeeks.
imho:
"Should we make this change?"
definitely, 100%. StemGeeks has its own token, economy and it sounds reasonable to reward those who are closer to the community.
"What percentage 10% - 50%?"
I am for 50%.
"Where should those rewards go, null or community fund?"
I am for "...put them into a community fund that is used to reward STEMGeeks.net users".
I'd like to ask about
"The STEMGeeks team already has a significantly sized Bounty fund that is used for promotion, prizes, and hiring help."
--> "...and hiring help."
What do you mean by that?
Is it about
https://steemit.com/stemgeeks/@stemgeeks/bring-someone-posting-good-stem-content-to-stemgeeks-and-get-500-stem
"Bring someone posting good STEM content to STEMGeeks and get 500 STEM!"
"Find someone publishing quality content about Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math and get them to make a post on StemGeeks."
"If you successfully onboard a new user, "
My question is
How should one prove that it's he/she who brought the user to StemGeeks?
I'm currently a student at the leading university of my country and have a great opportunity to promote StemGeeks among other students and teachers.
thanks
part of the initial distribution we had tokens set aside for a bounty fund. This is used for prizes, promotion, and hiring. By hiring I mean if we wanted something done we could offer STEM tokens in exchange.
There is no easy way. Hence the relatively moderate prize, but there are referrals now that can show who referred someone via Hive Onboarding.