300 'Doctors' Try to Cancel Joe Rogan? Events Mirrored by Attempted Execution Of A Radio Host in Uganda For Vax Dissent - Gov Was Proven Wrong!

avatar
(Edited)

Dr. Robert Malone appearing on the Joe Rogan Podcast, achieving what may be the most watched podcast in human history, has generated a predictable response from mainstream voices in the medical world. Appeals to authority, a lack of evidence to rebut his claims and avoidance of depth of detail. Worse than this though is that history shows us a case from Africa that is very similar and where many people died due to government lies - later exposed by a radio show host that they threatened to execute for questioning them publicly!

image.png

https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1481956437559554054

As you can see, mainstream media has done their best to counter Malone's narrative on Joe Rogan and has been promoting an open letter which has been claimed to have been signed by '270 Doctors' denouncing Rogan and Malone as 'dangerous agents of misinformation'. We can immediately sense the red flags just by opening the article from the Guardian, above, where it shifts to saying that the signatories are actually a combination of Doctors, nurses, researchers and others. The open letter itself lists all concerned and plenty of them are actually medical students or blog editors/writers, not even close to being Doctors!

However, there are clearly a variety of actual Doctors listed too. I'll set aside that when the Gt. Barrington declaration was made by three leading experts from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford Universities, declaring the government control policies for COVID19 to be inept and dangerous, that the pro control people said 'oh, you can't rely on those signatures, anyone could have signed them'... So let's just assume that all the signatures on the open letter are genuinely from who they claim to be from.

I'll share a few quotes from the letter and address them, then I want to share with you a story I have covered previously from Uganda that is highly relevant.

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Joe Rogan has repeatedly spread misleading and false claims on his podcast, provoking distrust in science and medicine.

There is no possible way that having multiple extremely experienced Doctors and scientific researchers in for podcasts can provoke distrust in science and medicine. The people being questioned are from the science and medicine fields - the distrust is for SOME of the people pushing the control narratives, trying to censor dissenters and pushing experimental drugs on children! Science is a conversation and disagreement is a 100% normal and natural part of it - if the mainstream (corporate led) 'science' can't stand up to a podcaster, then it probably needs some work, no?

In episode #1757, Rogan hosted Dr. Robert Malone, who was suspended from Twitter for spreading misinformation about COVID-19

Well, yes, does the actions of a silicon valley Tech company have any baring on the truth or accuracy of scientific claims? Are these Doctors suggesting that Twitter banning Malone is evidence of Malone being incorrect? Rational people would say no.

Dr. Malone’s interview has reached many tens of millions of listeners vulnerable to predatory medical misinformation

'predatory'? really!? Predators literally kill to feed themselves or seek out vulnerable people to intend to do harm to them. This open letter not only slanders Dr. Malone but offers zero evidence to back up it's claim here. Later in the letter they try to say that there is no evidence to back up what Malone is saying about various aspects of the situation, yet they go even further than they say he is, by making claims about him with literally zero evidence offered. At least Malone provides studies and evidence to back up his claims.

As scientists, we face backlash and resistance as the public grows to distrust our research and expertise

You took the job, you made the claims, you get the results. Cause and effect 101.

The rest of the letter is a predictable and almost empty attempt to use appeals to authority to have Spotify capitulate into censoring Rogan and it's entire platform.

Note: Spotify has grown as large as it is largely by doing deals with major record labels that sold out their artists in exchange for equity in Spotify, making the record labels wealthy without them needing to work for it and ultimately making artists worse off. Do not expect Spotify to behave in any kind of renegade way here.

Malone is a scientist who once researched mRNA technology but is now a vocal skeptic of the COVID-19 vaccines that use it.

source: AP

Associated Press tries to 'prove' that Malone did not work to co-invent the mRNA vaccine technology - yet many other articles fully accept that he had a pivotal role in it's early development. He holds numerous relevant patents and has openly said that it was not all his work - he credits the numerous geniuses around him at the time and many others who worked on the technology afterwards. So AP reveals their bias here immediately.

“Psychosis” is a term that refers to conditions that involve some disconnect from reality. According to a National Institutes of Health estimate, about 3% of people experience some form of psychosis at some time in their lives.

source: AP

Psychosis is indeed a disconnection from reality - but what IS reality? We all have our own realities, like it or not. Are you sure that you know who does and does not have psychosis? Sometimes it might be obvious to you - but other times you might be part of a consensus reality that is actually based in error. Were the fans of Nazi Germany in WW2 psychotic? I would say so, but at the time they would have been likely to say that their opponents were psychotic - so psychosis is often subjective. In this case, the claim of mass psychosis by Malone is based on evidence that can be addressed piece by piece, yet that has not happened here from what I can see.

Multiple experts told the AP that while there is evidence that groups can shape or influence one’s behaviors — and that people can and do believe falsehoods that are put forward by the leader of a group — those concepts do not involve the masses experiencing “psychosis”

source: AP

If populations can believe falsehoods spread by leaders, then by definition they are to some extent experiencing psychosis. The scale of the lies determine the degree of psychosis. So again, AP shows that they are at least biased and arguably actually demonstrating psychosis themselves.

I looked through the other relevant links in the open letter looking for data or scientific substance, but they linked to an Instagram post that basically just said 'we debunked Malone'.. lol .. I did not see any real value in the links provided, but by all means point me to any I may have missed.

Ugandan Radio Presenter Mirrors The Joe Rogan Situation


Kihura Nkuba is the founder of Greater African Radio and president of The East African World Broadcasters Association and director of the Pan African Center For Strategic and International Studies. As I covered in a previous article, he was threatened with execution and survived assassination attempts (possibly from agents of pharma corporations) after stumbling into a controversy surrounding polio vaccines.

The short version is that the Ugandan government was forcing live Polio vaccines on the population, despite them being highly dangerous and being banned in most countries. Children were running into the jungle to escape being forcibly vaccinated, sometimes at gunpoint, by government forces. It became apparent that many of those vaccinated, died - while those who ran away survived. Nkuba raised the topic on his popular radio show and was swiftly threatened by the government as a result.

The government wanted to charge him with sedition, which would have meant his execution! The intense pressure caused him to study vaccination to as high a degree as he could. After the government closed his radio station down, the people rioted in disgust and eventually the government agreed to have him on air to debate with their 'experts' on the topic of the polio vaccine.

Nkuba was worried, but it turned out that the government experts were actually clueless and not only demonstrated that they lacked understanding of their own field but they actually contradicted each other on air.

Eventually it was accepted that the use of the wrong Polio vaccine had killed large numbers of people in Uganda and that he was correct.

You can watch his presentation here:

Now, it's clear that no matter what your stance on the COVID19 shots, there is a pattern emerging here that is a direct mirror of what happened in Uganda. However, in this situation the outcome is not yet as clear.

In both cases we have effectively a radio/podcast host challenging the mainstream narrative on vaccines and finding himself on the receiving end of attempts to silence him. Perhaps Joe Rogan, Dr. McCullough and Dr. Malone need to have a long show where they invite on their main detractors to present evidence and make clear to the public who demonstrates greater capacity for expertise, plus has the better evidence?


Wishing you well,
Ura Soul



Read My User Guide for Hive Here


Hive Alive Banner 2.png
Powerful insights into the Hive blockchain are available at my website, Hive Alive.
Including the only way to track downvotes on Hive - The Untrending report


The NFT Symposium
The NFT Symposium is a community space where NFT creators, artists, traders, enthusiasts & visionaries rub virtual shoulders, share ideas, start projects, grow together & learn.

Get paid to mine your imagination for the benefit of the entire NFT world:

NFTSymposium.io.

Crucial Web, digital marketing agency in Norwich, UK
Looking for ethical Digital Marketing Agency?
@crucialweb can help you to grow and innovate online.
al



0
0
0.000
34 comments
avatar

As scientists, we face backlash and resistance as the public grows to distrust our research and expertise

They don't understand that these attempts to silence and censor people is exactly what is creating the backlash, resistance, and distrust that they're complaining about?

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are relying on 'appeal to authority' - a logical fallacy that basically says 'we are the ones who know, so we are right' and that's that. Once you rely on such things, censoring and even executions are justified to keep your world 'in order' - what the other people think is irrelevant as they are too dumb to think for themselves.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Team 'X' cancelling team 'Y' is now outraged team 'Y' is cancelling team 'X' and as team 'Y' cancels team 'X' team 'X' cancels team 'Y' as team 'X' cancels team 'Y' as team 'Y' cancels team 'X' and it just goes on like this as both 'X' and 'Y' act the exact same way yet have convinced themselves of being different.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't really see rogan and malone cancelling anyone, they are just trying to put across their points and let people think for themselves.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I said team 'X' and team 'Y'. You filling in the blanks is called 'spin'.

Have a nice day.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Given the context of the post, applying logic it makes sense that you were suggesting that the teams were the characters highlighted in my post. If not then I'm not really sure what you comment means, other than pointing to the futility of trying to cancel people (without actually murdering them. lol).

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Once again, you're applying spin, not logic. Logical thing to do is ask a question when you don't understand, then wait for an answer. Unfortunately I don't feel like explaining. It is what it is.

In all seriousness, I highly doubt anyone will take out Rogan (definitely not physically). It's Spotify they're after. Apparently they think they're shareholders or on the board of directors or on the payroll or something and get to call the shots. Rogan does a fine job of brushing this shit off. You're probably more outraged than he is.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not outraged, this is totally par for the course and I wasn't expecting anyone to kill Rogan, though I have had personal death threats just for sharing publicly available scientific studies under a public pro vaccine thread way before COVID19. I'm just wanting to try to fill people in on what has been going on in the vaccine/pharma world that mostly never gets a mention.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

No need to explain. I've already proven I have a firm handle on the situation with my initial comment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

But you are still a prick...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! Anything else I can do for you today?

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can grasp the agenda and chew the fat...

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

You mean enter your bubble? Become an 'X' or a 'Y' then allow myself to be manipulated?

0
0
0.000
avatar

This may be barking up the wrong tree, but i get the impression that x means those who belive the covid narritive, and y means those who see it for the globalist bullshit it is.

Maybe you have the luxury of not yet having your life, country, or livelihood totally fucked over.

This is a wild ride, and we are all being manipulated.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I'm aware. X ÷ Y = Z

I don't want that Z shit in my head. The x and y's can keep it. They'll figure out Z sooner or later. They're just not as quick as N or G. Still too busy consuming; being fed. Won't notice until the plate is empty.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Much as I'd like to be theoretical, I'm playing for my life now because I would die before I'd submit to communism, globalism, or the death jab, and we are not fucking around here now. Even the memes are for real. In the past two years a lot has changed and it will never be the same again. For better or worse.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hopefully your answer to the end of the world isn't to just sit on the computer and watch it, leaving comments along the way.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You sure?

You mentioned a theoretical involving teams X and Y, insisting that any relation to the "pro-covid" and "anti-covid" narratives has nothing to do with what you said.

I for one, (and it seems that most other responders) have no clue what you meant, if not that. & I consider myself to be intelligent enough to read between the lines.

Not even mad, just trying to make sense of what you're trying to say.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Division existed long ago. It's not exclusive to covid. If there's something confusing you, there's always the '?'

You sure?

Yes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OK, there's always been division.
However, there have also been right sides (or less wrong, I guess) throughout history as well. So simply the matter of division is not an issue in and of itself.

So if not to point out that there are pro-covid and anti-covid camps, what was the point of your initial message?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nobody wants to take a moment to understand one another. It's also a media circus. Elements of showmanship due to the common behavioral patterns demonstrated on social media. Everyone wants to be bigger, better, bolder; silence or crush the opposition. 'Win' the end of the world. A spectacle for the ages.

A bit of sarcasm there. Society with its finger pointing, consistently oblivious to the three fingers pointed back at itself.

The sky is falling.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OK, I think I understand your point.

It is also why I don't consider myself "anti-vax", but rather "anti-covid" (so as not to point the finger at anyone). People can get the shot if they so choose, my fear is that due to the circumstances, it is no longer a choice in the purest sense but a "do this or else".

So even though I try to avoid "the sky is falling" mentalities, it truly does feel like there is a cultural war being fought - not with guns and ammo, but social coercion and silencing of opposition. Add to that economic instability, rapid social changes and encroachment on basic human rights... you cannot stay neutral on a moving train.

Joe will likely not be banned from Spotify (and even if he does, dude's a multi-millionaire) - but the ground is already set that those who are not "too big to fail" (like Joe) are more or less doomed to do so - unless they choose to go to fringe networks, where they will live in obscurity. A sort of shadow-ban, if you will.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wouldn't call myself neutral. Simply no desire to join in and say all the same things, think the things I'm 'supposed' to think, and whatever else. The 'news' and commentary based on news being passed off as news is just showbiz. I don't listen to the messages from either 'side'; prefer to watch the people, the reaction. Get a better feel for what's really going on, that way.

It hasn't been easy to describe. What comes to mind so clearly has been difficult to put into words.

And Joe's just riding a wave. Plenty of people get on that wave. Big or small, the feeling is the same. Takes a strong mind to be able to ride it out. He's good at it. Some people are built for that, most crack. What's interesting is there are several people on the planet who can handle it. Getting there though is damn near impossible. Nobody starts out thinking they'll get there either. It just kind of happens and one learns on the fly.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Woops, didn't see this, sorry.

I guess, I can sympathise with your approach. The problem is that I feel that if I stay quiet, I'm being complacent, in a way.

Well that's the thing. Joe has the privilege, the money and the power (not to mention mental fortitude) to ride this wave. Most people don't. Take a random YT podcast that has 10-20 episodes are a few thousand views. Now that podcaster gets branded a conspiracy theorist, misinformant or whatever. He will likely sink from the pressure

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wouldn't say I'm quiet. It's just confusing for people. Not sure if I'm friend or foe. It's not worth the hassle sometimes.

And you can see people crack here on chain. One large 'negative review' and that's all they can think or talk about for weeks. Self destruct mode. Tunnel vision, seeing red; can't get through to them. And then they're done. Poof.

0
0
0.000
avatar

First heard of this when I saw a link to a Rolling Stone Article about it.
Didn't read their article tho, read yours instead

0
0
0.000
avatar

hehe, thanks, yeah you won't get much value added by the centralised and standardised media.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's only one part of the agenda but watching the coronhoax implode will be a spectacular sight!

0
0
0.000
avatar

expect denial and all kinds of bizarre and unhinged behaviours!

0
0
0.000
avatar

If they try to cancel Joe Rogan, they are scared...and they have all the reason.😊
Babylon is falling...finally.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's interesting that being banned on twitter is used as a reason to not listen to someone.

If my GP doesn't have a twitter account does that mean I shouldn't take their advice? I don't have a twitter account, are all my opinions worthless?

Madness.

0
0
0.000