Scientifically Illiterate Journalism - Russian Nuclear Submarine in Perspective

avatar
(Edited)

How hard would it be for a news organization to have a physicist on call to check facts and put things into perspective? They don't do that because there's an incentive to write click-bait articles instead of paying a physicist to check facts. Here are a few examples:







We have willfully illiterate journalism, but that's not new. It's just something to keep in mind when reading headlines. In this example highlighted below by thunderf00t, journalists got a tip that there's a nuclear sub that's leaking radiation. So they "investigated" and got some facts. Then, instead of doing any kind of interpretation of the facts they got, they just parroted it back to their readers.

The "800,000 higher than normal" headline is misleading because it's really only twice the average background, whereas the average airplane flight gives you 40 times background.

If news organizations can't put this kind of thing in perspective, what other facts do they blow out of proportion?

In a nutshell, it's as if these news organizations reported that if you ate one banana in the Norwegian Sea, you'd be getting 15,000 times normal dose of radiation.



0
0
0.000
19 comments
avatar

I wonder what were the real reason for it's finding and if there might be some other political reasons behind. It was the interesting but I still feel there is so much missing around that new. In fact I really find it hard to read serious and informative news and many times those are not getting into the news feed from Google lol I guess for economical reasons

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Maybe so, but that's not reason to skip the context, right?

0
0
0.000
avatar

People love using nuclear stuff to fear monger. Did you know that if you jump into the midst of a volcano, that is also dangerous?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, but you can see a volcano. People are weirded out by radiation because it's invisible. But once you understand the dangers, and why, it's not as scary.

0
0
0.000
avatar

POP POP POP How=- u know I love to pop princesses! lol jk./s flag pop that is!: )!
from: @yoursecretadmirer-bot101

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi, @inertia!

You just got a 0.96% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

@inertia is part of the gang stalking group @steemspeak ran by @fyrstikken, that uses Voice to Skull. This comment is here to let people know.

This is not a warning, it's a fact. Voice to skull will read your thoughts first without your knowledge for a long time, to map you. They then include transmitting self octave scale-able comments into your head to a tight, pulsed pace, indefinitely. Any brain activity, even the smallest, will trigger this when sound is turned on. You have to do all of your thinking around this. It is extreme torture, done by monsters.

@inertia your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special, your so special.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, the news is often willfully ignorant of science and technology. I don't think it would be that hard to consult someone to verify articles...but they don't. It regularly annoys me.

I've considered whether or not news organizations should be fined for things like this, because they are causing misinformation, panic, etc, depending on the story. Of course, if such a law were passed, it would have to be written very carefully, and my country's lawmakers aren't exactly known for passing intelligent legislation in recent times.

In regards to the specific story, I'm not a physicist or anything, just I instantly knew that there was something sketchy about it, because they didn't reference what the number was or anything. So the question becomes "800,000" times what? If it was 800,000 times background, that would be scary...but still needs reference to other numbers, like a normal X-ray, which is common, or how much you get during a flight. They clearly intentionally made a misleading article to get clicks.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

@inertia

@inertia your steem power effects the steem reward pool :(

i will stake #stem also ! :)
for virtuous cycle
i always stake and curate for better future !

kindly reMove your downvote flag

0
0
0.000
avatar

Huh?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

use json multiplexer setting to not too harm steem rewards !
Be THOUGHTFUL !

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am being very thoughtful.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

pathetic
u took away steem reward pools hurt it idiot !

0
0
0.000
avatar

@inertia, In my opinion, the whole world is attracted towards the Commercial aspects and in this process Truth and Facts are pushed behind.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Scientifically illiterate journalism is indeed a huge issue nowadays, because...

if it's on the internet, then it must be true.

As a result, the world is being taught the "truth" by news readers and TV series. Research? Ain't nobody got time for that!!

0
0
0.000