No vaccine will be a silver bullet against all mutations. And as the n ...

avatar

No vaccine will be a silver bullet against all mutations. And as the number of mutations is proportional to the transmission rate, many more of them are expected in the future.

Stay home, save lives.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/02/health/variant-mutation-e484k/index.html

Posted via D.Buzz



0
0
0.000
35 comments
avatar

Wow 😳

  • I'll take my chances before getting the experimental vaccine and the MANY MORE that would follow 😣

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

No matter what, stay home as much as possible, even after vaccinated.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, that's a little bit too paranoid for me, way too paranoid actually.

  • But different strokes for different folks :D

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think that to follow science is paranoid, at least not as much as following conspiracy theories of the internet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

And I don't think that saying something is science means it's science.

  • Even if that person is shown on TV and the mainstream media over and over again saying the same thing.

To be honest though, they don't say the same thing, it's full of contradictions & on purpose.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Look for what the Universities are saying around the world though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have seen a lot of silly things and blatent propaganda come from Universities.

  • The eye is in the beholder I guess 👍

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

I have seen much more silly things coming from internet conspiracy theorists.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have seen a lot of silly conspiract theories too lol 😅

  • But they are not mub a threat, since they are labeled as silly.

But the establishment & Universities are seen as credible sources of info, but sometimes are used for propaganda & misinfo imo.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Anyway, the Universities are much more trustworthy than internet conspiracy theorists. That is the point.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm, I think it's better to not only point out a specific University, but a specific person in that University . . & not only a specific person, but a specific statement that person said

  • Then compare it to a statement on the Internet that contradicts it

#NotAllOrNone

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

No I don't follow individual opinions, but the scientific consensus. And the best place to know this is from the renowned Universities around the world.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, I guess you don't see that the "consensus" among US Universities has been high-jacked to further a political & global agenda.

  • As always though, we can agree to disagree.

But hopefully you use common sense, analyze & think about what you read + see 👍


Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is the exact narrative of the conspirationists. I don't buy it, at least not to the point of distrusting science and the Universities.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm, distrusting "science" is the wrong way to word it.

  1. Science is NOT a list of truths, it's the practice of experimenting & observing the results

  2. If someome tells you what to believe & you believe it since they said it was "science", believing it is NOT science.

    Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Science is not the opinion of somebody or even an individual scientist. Science is the scientific consensus.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm its not the consensus, it's a method for testing & observing results

  1. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

  2. Part of the scientific method is questioning the consensus

  3. If you blindly accept whatever the consensus is, you are not being scientific

    Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

The consensus is formed using the method. If using the method you cannot contradict the consensus, it gets stronger. The consensus is the culmination, the apex of the method.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm, the consensus doesn't always get stronger, sometimes it breaks and scientists discover the consensus was WRONG.

  • One of the best acheivements for a scientist is proving the consensus wrong!

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

It is very rare to a scientific consensus be contradicted. Normally they are just perfected. My advice is to not be on the wrong side. Specially when you are distrusting a scientific consensus to follow internet conspiracy theory. It is definitely not something very smart to do.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm, well

  1. There's a scientific consenses AND

  2. There's a Government & #BigTech consensus where no discussion is allowed & anyone that disagrees w/Dr. Fauci is censored off the net, ridiculed, shamed & in the case of well respected scientists, not given air time

    Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Oh wait, I see what you mean, I misread it at first.

  • Yeah you are right.

But there is a lot of people and scientists who contradicted the "Consensus", they are being censored though, and some of them are from Universities, reputable Hospitals, etc.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are not censored, they are refuted using the scientific method. Take for example the intelligent design, the "scientists" that defended it were not censored but completely refuted.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm no, check my @dbuzz Profile

  1. I posted a video of an interview w/ Cartherine Fitts, a former banker & US official who points out that 34 of the 37 towns with riots, had a Federal Reserve bank
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts

It got censored


Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

What it has to do with science? She is not even a scientist.

0
0
0.000
avatar

She is not a scientist but is my most recent example of someone bring censored who went against the mainstream narratives.

  1. I also saw a patent on WIPO for a #Covid19 test registered in 2015 that was somewho removed from the WIPO site a week or two later.

Its happened a lot

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

The mainstream narrative is mostly supported by science. You cannot go against scientific consensus without being refuted. It would be immoral.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The "consensus" you are talking about has been refuted & is common sense when you analyze the evidence you are obviously not seeing

  • I post it here but I dont think you watch any of the videos

i.e. No one has ever isolated the whole virus, yet #BigPharma sells vaccines?

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Videos of iinventor of PCR test (the test used for "diagnosing" Covid) where he:

  1. Calls Dr. Fauci a fraud with an agenda.

  2. Explains that the PCR test is NOT used to diagnose anything and cannot be used for it

Have been repeatedly censored, then referenced incorrectly

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you haven't seen respected doctors, researchers & scientists who call mask wearing completely ineffective (in most cases) & unnecessary..

Get censored from the net, you must only tune into the programming of #Mainstream #Media

That video I posted fot deleted w/12 hours

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Science has nothing to do with individual opinions, but with the consensus. Science is not opinion, it has methods and criteria to follow until it gets to its final conclusions.

0
0
0.000
avatar
  • The "consensus" you are referring to is an artificial one, since the rulings as dictated from Dr. Fauci & WHO are NOT open for debate

Agree with the Government or get censored


Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

But btw, I appreciate communicating with you . . These are just my views 😊

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000