Controversial Killer Robots, When Is Regulation

avatar


Corridor digital

It is predicted that killer robots and killer weapons that can kill people will emerge in the next few years. The New York Times described the situation as `` the killing of the algorithmic era, '' and said that "by talking to military experts in Russia, Switzerland, California, and the United States, it could be released soon."

Drones that choose their own targets and machine guns with facial recognition software will soon be available at military installations around the world. This terrible killer robot may be coming soon, but no regulatory news has yet been heard.


The Campaign To Stop Killer Robots

Stop killer robots, a group aimed at banning fully autonomous weapons, call killer robots "human-threatening killing weapons" and argue that they should be blocked in 2013. Due to the nature of fully automatic devices, it may be difficult to hold civil and criminal responsibility. Even after mass killings, no one can be punished and no one can be held accountable.

Some countries support the group's claim, but the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, China, and Israel claim that it is not regulated. It effectively blocks all regulations by taking advantage of the nature of the United Nations, which requires agreement between Member States to create treaties.

Their argument is this. "The killer robot doesn't exist yet. It doesn't exist. You can't regulate anything."


The Campaign To Stop Killer Robots

The NYT referred to the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons in 1995 and emphasized that "there is a precedent for proactive bans." The Protocol is an agreement concerning the prohibition and limitation of the use of certain conventional weapons, or lasers, which may result in excessive injury or indiscriminate effects.

Prohibiting the use of lasers in the army to blind the enemy. Attacking the eye with a laser is known to be difficult to recover and assistive devices to compensate for vision. The laser was also banned if the laser was used in combination with other weapons.

At the time, there was an opinion that there was no reason to prematurely regulate it as a 'future weapon', but there was a case where the soldier was blinded by phosgene gas during the First World War. Weapons must be firmly dealt with in advance. "



0
0
0.000
1 comments
avatar

According to the Bible, How do you influence faith to Christian believers? (Part 3 of 3)

(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.)



Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #SteemPower. It's our little way to Thank you, our beloved friend.
Check our Discord Chat
Join our Official Community: https://beta.steemit.com/trending/hive-182074

0
0
0.000