Press Conference Today: Update on Landmark Case Against FCC on 5G and Wireless Exposure

about 3 years ago

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry. It has failed miserably for decades (see 1, 2).

By B.N. Frank

During the Trump administration lawsuits were filed against the agency for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of cell phone and WiFi radiation (see 1, 2) as well as 5G on Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and in space.

A summary about yesterday’s hearing has already been published. There will be a press conference held later today to discuss more details.

From Children’s Health Defense:

CHD v FCC – 1/26 Press Conference for Oral Arguments

On January 25 we had oral arguments in our landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The hearing went VERY WELL.

Our case challenges the FCC’s refusal to review its 25-year-old obsolete wireless “health guidelines” and to adopt scientific, biologically based radio frequency emissions rules that adequately protect public health from wireless devices and infrastructure, including 5G. After the hearing, we do indeed feel that we are closer than ever to FCC accountability!

Both Children’s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust filed cases against the FCC but filed the briefs jointly. While EHT has been represented by attorney Ed Meyers, because of a court decision that only one attorney will be allowed to present, Scott McCollough, CHD’s attorney, represented both CHD and EHT Petitioners in oral arguments.

The judges asked excellent questions and showed in-depth knowledge of the case. The honorable Judge Henderson, a chemical engineer by training, told the FCC: “I am inclined to rule against you,” which is a rare and strong statement from a judge.

The honorable Judge Millet consistently pushed the FCC to answer why the FCC and/or the FDA didn’t review the evidence on non-cancer effects of wireless technology; why they addressed only cell phones when there is evidence on effects from various other devices and infrastructure; and why they didn’t address the cumulative effects from the chronic exposure for numerous devices.

Judge Millet said to the FCC attorney: “How was it reasonable for the FCC to rely so heavily on a response from the FDA that … did not address the very things you asked for information on: other devices, the use of multiple devices and physical harms other than cancer?“

Press Conference

On Tuesday, January 26, 2021, at 5 p.m. EST (2 p.m. PST), we will hold a virtual press conference to discuss the oral arguments and the case.

Our Speakers

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CHD’s Chairman and co-counsel in the case
Scott W. McCollough, CHD’s attorney on this case
Dafna Tachover, CHD Director of the 5G and Wireless Harm Project

Briefs Filed in the Case

What’s Next

The January 25th hearing concludes our work on the case. Now we wait for the Court’s decision. We expect to have a decision within six months.

This hearing concludes an intense work over 13 months. CHD’s team feels content that they did the best job they could and that no resource was spared. We thank our wonderful attorney, Scott McCollough. We also would like to thank the Environmental Health Trust team including its Chairman, Devra Davis, and its attorney, Ed Meyers, as well as Cindy Franklin from Consumers from Safe Cell Phones and to all the experts who helped us.

Special thanks to all of you who donated to help make this important case possible. We are very grateful.

This has been a HUGE TEAM EFFORT and I am very honored for the privilege to be able to take this case on.

Good luck to us all,

Dafna Tachover

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ybEeBtwKJUY/

Opposition to 5G is worldwide. Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums. The majority of scientists worldwide oppose deployment.

High speed internet is achievable, safer and more secure with a wired internet connection (see 1, 2) – not 5G or WiFi. In fact, Americans have paid to have this already (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Americans opposed to 5G may sign this letter asking President Biden and Vice President Harris to stop deployment.

Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on Telegram, SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab and Ruqqus.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

technology health telecom

0.000

0 comments