RE: Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

It's one thing to prevent the stake from witness voting it's another one to prevent transfers and selling. Even if they did do that, powering down takes 13 weeks which would have given the community 6 or 7 weeks to prepare a countermeasure should they power down, transfer and power back up.



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

Even 6 weeks worth of power down could have massive effects on Steem governance.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah but that's 6 weeks of warning time to prepare for it. You just fired a warning shot and accidentally punctured a hole in their haul, I'm sure that's going to go well.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why? This SF is really just temporary without bad intentions. It's a protective measure, nothing more.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What is the sunset clause on this? Temporary is just a word until you set an end-point. If you said: "For 3 months until we have time to negotiate terms with the Tron team." That would be one thing but as it stands it might as well be until the heat death of the universe.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Don't forget, witnesses can change their mind or get voted out. If the community doesn't want this protection in place, it won't have it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's exactly what I did. Obviously I'm just a grain of salt so ultimately it doesnt matter

0
0
0.000
avatar

It means "for now", just like Justin Sun said he wouldnt initiate a swap "for now"....

0
0
0.000
avatar

A "for now" for a "for now" appears reasonably balanced! ;)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sure, but this looks a lot like stealing. The precedent set from this cannot be undone. If this was truly done to protect steem then the Top 20 Witnesses should all step down indefinitely. It would give this movement a lot more credence.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Even ONE week would have a massive effect. Not necessarily unilateral control but still enormous influence, by itself probably in the top 5 stakeholders on the entire platform. It isn't practical or meaningful to talk about non-voting without preventing power down in my opinion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

besides the giving reasoning: a started powerdown could only be stopped either by the keyholder, or a hardfork. A hardfork would be a way more drastic implementation which also requires exchanges to update the software.

0
0
0.000