RE: One change to make science more open?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Publishing in a high impact journal is not, in and of itself, a contribution to science at all. Studies should not be judged by the journal which published them, but rather a verifiable record (beyond just citations) that the outputs of that study are driving the next generation of research.
Exactly.
0
0
0.000
Some journals also suck, in terms of the editorial team (regardless their impact factor):)
I couldn't imagine what the Nature of this comment could be.
I don't like Nature. A good journal, but a shitty non-open-access policy :)