RE: One change to make science more open?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Publishing in a high impact journal is not, in and of itself, a contribution to science at all. Studies should not be judged by the journal which published them, but rather a verifiable record (beyond just citations) that the outputs of that study are driving the next generation of research.

Exactly.



0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar

Some journals also suck, in terms of the editorial team (regardless their impact factor):)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I couldn't imagine what the Nature of this comment could be.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't like Nature. A good journal, but a shitty non-open-access policy :)

0
0
0.000