3 Scientific Studies that Destroy Mainstream Thinking on Major Global Current Events - Economics | Coronavirus | 9/11 (Hulsey Report Published Today)

in #newslast year (edited)

I have researched many topics over countless hours, days, months and years and have a wildly different understanding of what is occurring on this planet to most people I encounter. I have been writing about some aspects of what I have learned here on the blockchain for a few years and yet it seems few people who don't already know the details of what I am saying are listening. Some will only listen to 'experts' (who gets to decide who is an expert?), while some prefer simply denying aspects of reality for their own reasons. In any case, let's take a look at some 'voices of authority' from various fields who destroy mainstream narratives.

The reality is that to fully explain the details of the majority of the world's most important 'stories' requires going over hundreds of pages of evidence and ensuring that the listener has no gaps in their understanding of many interconnected topics. In truth, to do this would take something approaching an amount of time and work equivalent to a university degree (or longer). It's not that the details are necessarily complicated, but that there are so many of them spanning many years and that they thoroughly challenge heavily engrained belief systems that most people seem to share at this point. There is a difficulty due to the amount of information and also the degree to which people are entrenched in a counter narrative and are unwilling to question it.

Due to these challenges, I am just going to leave here a brief summary of three different scientific papers that drastically challenge the view of the world that has been presented by governments, mainstream media and 'scientific experts' for some time.

9/11 - The Hulsey report - 25th March 2020

Today, the finished version of the Hulsey report was published out of the Alaska Fairbanks University. It is a privately funded, thorough scientific study of the mechanics of the collapse of the world trade center towers in New York in 2001 (known as the 9/11 attacks). The mainstream narrative has always been that these towers collapsed only due to the impacts of the airliners that hit them and the resulting office fires that heated supporting columns and caused structural failure. War was started off the back of these events with Iraq (despite no direct connection being identified between the alleged hijackers and Iraq!).

The Hulsey report is the result of over 4 years of focused research, painstakingly recreating the towers in computer simulations to determine whether or not the alleged method of collapse described by the US Gov's NIST report is plausible or not. Note: Members of NISTs own team said the were underfunded and 'set up to fail' by the government.

The conclusion of the report is that US Gov's investigation into the collapse of the towers was utterly flawed and incorrect in it's conclusions. The final summary conclusion of the Halsey report is that the twin towers could NOT have collapsed through office fires and that the evidence shows that there is no possible way that the towers could have collapsed into their own footprint, as the evidence shows they did, without all the supporting columns of the towers failing simultaneously.

To all intents and purposes, this means that the towers must have been destroyed at least in part by some kind of internal - pre planned - demolition process. This is exactly what thousands of architects and engineers have been saying for over 15 years and what countless family members of victims of the attack have also come to understand.

You can access the Hulsey Report here.

Can Banks Create Money Out of Nothing? Empirical Evidence from Prof. Richard Werner

A fundamental lynch pin of the enslavement system being used against humanity is that of 'credit', 'loans' and 'mortgages'. Nearly all people have wrongly assumed that when they take out a loan from a bank, the money involved actually exists and that they are truly borrowing 'something'... After all, why would they be forced to pay interest on something that didn't really exist? Surely that wouldn't be right.

Numerous documentaries and researchers have shown that the fractional reserve banking system and other contractual 'anomalies' in the banking system have meant that the banks literally DO create money out of thin air, then loan it out (using sleight of hand) and even dare to charge interest on the fictional money. Imagine how wealthy you would be if you could multiply whatever money you had in your pocket by 13 times and then get paid interest on it too! That's what banks have been doing for a long time with the fully complicity of all government agencies.

Professor Richard Werner, an economics specialist, carried out the world's first empirical study of this phenomena by tracing transactions within a German bank's computer systems. Amazingly, there was debate among economists prior to this study because some thought that this 'loaning money out of nothing' simply didn't happen! His study shows that, 'yes', banks are enslaving everyone by forcing them to pay interest on imaginary money and the interest literally doesn't exist in the global currency systems. The inevitable outcome is that people WILL lose their homes, REGARDLESS of how hard they work or how smart they are.

You can access Richard Werner's paper here

Coronavirus from Bats Was Engineered with SARS and HIV in Chinese and US Labs

The recent pandemic of the 'novel coronavirus' named 'COVID 19' has led to a wide variety of theories, narratives and counter narratives. I have seen numerous theories spread around online which are backed by little evidence. At the same time I have seen theories which DO have significant evidence behind them being ridiculed by 'science' websites as being 'conspiracy theories' while these sites provide nothing substantial to back up their assertions. Ironically, these so called 'scientists' are ridiculing the scientific process and destroying their reputations in the process - all while trying to stem the spread of certain versions of events.

The topic of biological research and even bioweapons research is clearly one that is not easily understood by outsiders and that is part of the problem. Despite the complexities involved, most people will be able to understand that the following study is relevant:

Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin

This paper was published in 2007 and was apparently based on research carried out in China and the university of Maryland, USA. Whistleblowers have stated that some of the work was carried out in secure biohazard labs in the Wuhan area of China where it has been reported that COVID-19 was first identified.

The gist of the paper is that work was undertaken to combine the deadly SARS virus with novel forms of coronavirus found in bats, plus the added 'fun' ingredient of a 'pseudo' HIV component. In short, they appear to have deliberately created pretty much the same virus that the world has been experiencing. This was done despite the US having banned such work at the time.

Whether or not this research truly is connected to the existence of COVID-19 has yet to be proven 100% - however, what IS clear is that those who claim that there is no evidence that COVID-19 was engineered in a lab cannot do so without detailed reference to this study and other similar sources of evidence.

You can view the full paper on SARS Chimera virus engineering here


I personally think that if every person on Earth knew about these papers and the work behind them, they would be making wildly different choices to the ones currently being made by the majority on Earth. Denial is the real epidemic we face and being aware of sources of information like this is an important part of ending that denial.

Please share this post on with your friends and family at this crucial time. The decisions we make during this period will determine our fate in numerous ways - let's not design our destiny based on incomplete information!

If you have any comments on these papers then please do let us know below.

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

You Can Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!

Click the big black button below:

ura soul witness vote for hive

View My Witness Application Here

View Some of My Witness Related Posts

Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.

Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as peakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!

I am founder of a Digital Marketing Agency called @crucialweb. We aim to help our clients to grow and innovate online and are passionate about decentralised technology. Get in touch if you'd like to work with us.

I run a Blockchain powered social network for healing, balancing and evolving too. Meet compassionate co-creators of reality, learn, share, make life better and receive STEEM too!


I haven't heard anyone study any kind of liquid metal embrittlement in the collapse of the twin towers. Reportedly a little bit of molten Zinc came into contact with the steal beams of the flexborough factory in England, and the factory collapsed killing dozens. In the conspiracy theories of a controlled explosion (thermite) I have heard there were large quantities of zinc in the ground.

Other metals could contribute to LME, but highly destructive metals like Mercury and Gallium are pretty much banned on planes/airports.

The metal side of things goes in many directions. There was a whistleblower at a metal testing company who tried to raise the flag on testing standards issues that affected tests done on the metal from the twin towers.. He was sacked.
I've never heard of molten zinc causing a collapse - sounds unlikely to me, but I'm not a metallurgist!
There were allegedly molten iron spheres on the ground that were said to come from thermate (not thermite - different). I haven't seen enough evidence to know for sure, but it's difficult since the gov enacted the biggest cover up of a crime scene in human history during those days.. Shipping out an absurd amount of metal to China as I recall, without allowing any forensic work to take place.

There were pools of molten iron so hot that it remained molten for three weeks after the collapse. I'm surprised more people don't advocate for DEW or nukes as the source of such fierce heat.

Only thermite and thermate could have produced that energy, likely due to excess reactants that kept reacting in the pools below ground.

Kerosene, office chairs, and pristine passports didn't fuel that underground hell, but the fire below still burned.

I saw countless hours of arguments between people advocating for A DEW or a nuclear demolition and sadly, too many people wanted to argue instead of research. Dimitri Kalezov, Russian nuclear arsenal specialist, made a decent case for the towers being dustified by a chain reaction caused by nuclear demolition. The US 'Operation Plowshare' was a program in the 1960s to repurpose nuclear weapons technology into other areas and he claims it was common knowledge in certain circles that the WTC towers were designed with demolition by specialised nuclear in mind. New York planning code requires structures to be able to be demolished before they can be constructed and the scale of those towers meant that typical approaches could not be used - he says that this is why they used nuclear demolition by design.

Well, I saw them crumple to the ground and dissipate into dust, not vanish in a nuclear fireball. Either way, this was terrorism committed by the US government against it's people, even if one believes the al Qaeda conspiracy theory. al Qaeda was created by the USG under Carter, by then National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski and George HW Bush who was Director of the CIA at the time.


I don't care if the Twin Towers never even existed but were just Project Bluebeam holograms projected by Space Aliens and Antarctic Nazis. It was the imposition of a tyranny on America - and the world - that presages the completion ongoing today.

I yet hope that because the virus escaped from Ft. Detrick in June 2019, the globalist's plans have fatal weaknesses due to the forcing of their hand, and the discovery of the intentional spread of the pandemic in Iran, Australia, Italy, N. America, and China will enrage the people of the world, and enable our defeat of the genocidal criminals that seek the last drop of our blood for their first meal as overlords and gods of the world to come.

Edit: would you be willing to read my Introduceyourself post? A resteem from you would grant it visibility, if it meets your approval.

The device he describes is a nuclear demolition device, not a bomb - it's effects were not intended to cause a fireball. You can get a sense of it from this archive footage from operation plowshare:

yes, regardless of the details, the evidence show a highly probable 'inside job' by significant numbers of people from the alleged 'good guys' side. :/

That's quite a bunker buster.

I really appreciate your kindness and consideration having a look at my IntroduceYourself post. I know your time is limited.

Thank you.

It's easy to test this. Please do so, and then discuss your findings, rather than just repeating assertions that appear to be nothing but trolling. I have seen enormous amounts of steel that has been coated with zinc, a process called galvanization, and so has everybody here.

Never have I noted that steel becoming useless structurally.

This allegation is baseless, almost certainly false, and appears to be intended to poison the well of rational discussion of the terrorism executed by the US government against American civilians to keep them cowed and obedient to profitable quasi-slavery.

You can easily buy pure zinc at any marina, because it is sold to decrease corrosion of other metals, and use it to test whether or not galvanization turns steel into trash. However, just considering the claim logically reveals it's almost certainly nothing but disinformation - a lie - intended to prevent people from considering actual facts.

Repeating it without rational consideration, or better yet, actually testing it, is harmful to folks facing the horrifying prospect of being ruled by despots via terrorism.

Please don't do that.

I am trained to do welding and plasma cutting, but I don't presently own or have access to said equipment. LME was not a topic brought up at the class, as we were just focusing on steel, but it was something I was previously made aware of. If not for bad AI at a staffing agency, I would likely be building battleships.
If I were spend the money for a welder system, the electrodes, and for kevlar based PPE, I don't think you'd watch my experimentation nor do I think it would be worth my time/money. Sure I could build a bloom furnace a lot cheaper than the commercial equipment to just melt a some Zinc onto steel and try to replicate the process of LME, but the ground is still frozen here. Still a waste of my time. Why?, because there are already scientific literature on the subject of Liquid Metal Embrittlement freely available. Including this one from the American Welding society. Read it.


Zinc melts @~420 F. You can melt zinc in a frying pan on your stove, all you'll need besides a hunk of zinc is a hunk of steel.

That paper describes a very limited set of circumstances and alloys LME affects, not ordinary steel but austenitic stainless steel. Not one girder in the Twin Towers was made of stainless, so LME didn't contribute at all to the 9/11 demolition.

I can appreciate how the specific details of LME are a bit esoteric, and note you're a welder, not a metallurgist. However, the hypothesis regarding 9/11 isn't supported by the paper you link, and you seem to write well, indicating good intelligence, so I think you should be competent to understand the paper.

"...the heat of welding can readily induce liquid metal embrittlement cracking in 300 series stainless steel when it is welded to galvanized carbon steel..."

That's the only conditions in which LME is produced according to the paper.

I hope your understanding now includes that LME only affects austenitic stainless steel, which does not include the support structure of the Twin Towers.

BTW, don't melt any zinc without a full respirator. The fumes from boiling zinc are extremely toxic. Never, ever weld galvanized steel without a respirator. An ordinary mask won't stop the vapor.

The melting point of Zinc is indeed 420 degrees, but Celsius not Fahrenheit. I am not sure that my stove top can reach those temperatures. You are right about it being toxic, I'll keep that in mind if I leave the country and make gun metal.

The article was from apparently 1992, before the twin tower attack. Of course it wasn't geared towards proving or suggesting the cause of the collapse of the twin towers, but showing that the phenomena of liquid metal embrittlement of molten zinc on steel was already documented and didn't need my repeating. You chose to focus too far into one specific example, instead of as general concept.

A36 steel is one of the types of steel that was used in the world trade center. Galvenized steel can include A36 steel like seen in the above article, but galvanization makes structural steel weaker. There are standards that try to minimize LME during the galvanization process but it can still occur. Supposing that sufficient molton zinc (or even lead, or some other metals) came into contact during the impact then the fuel combustion would make the temperatures by ripe for the LME but there would be substantial additional stress if not from the impact then from the structure itself enhancing LME potential.


I should have immediately pointed out that I am not a metallurgist, and have no specific expertise based on experience. What is in the papers you are providing is my source on these issues, except for my lifelong experience with galvanized pipe, which isn't very brittle as a rule.

I very much appreciate your pointing out the noob error of confusing Celsius with Fahrenheit.

The steel in the Twin Towers was not galvanized. Even if the planes were made of solid zinc, they would not have so embrittled the towers as to cause collapse, because almost all of the heat from the explosions of the fuel was expended in less than one minute. There was no zinc to embrittle the steel,and the towers didn't collapse immediately, but only after significant time had passed, revealing that sudden embrittlement did not contribute to the collapse.

Absent thermite and thermate, and intentional demolition, the towers would not have collapsed. LME was not a significant factor in that demolition. In this last paper you have provided, steels beyond stainless are revealed to potentially be subject to LME. Regardless, unless you propose some mechanism by which the planes coated the internal structures of the towers in liquid zinc, and caused it to penetrate deeply into the 24" thick supporting members, LME could have played no part in the demolition of the towers on 9/11.

"...They found that most of the cracks were formed in the periphery area at the vicinity of the contacted area between the electrodes and TWIP steel sheets..."

LME is a highly localized phenomenon, and restricted to the surface of even sheet steel used throughout this paper. Such surficial effects would have had almost no effect on beams 24" thick.

Finally, I read your posting. Thanks for sharing those references. I'm completely with you in those three cases. I just don't get how you can state below the very same article on Steem, with all those principles in place that you mentioned, that Hive is decentralized - just because there are +20 Nodes supporting its basic functions and jada jada... There's quite some indications that "Ninja stake" was involved while it has been created, just as "Ninja stake" has been given as a reason to fork Steem in the first place - and that's not the thing I want to criticize. But that decentralization can not exist in delegated systems. Although I wish that Hive is going to be a success to many! Chain on! Chains off!!

(This is on Hive, cross commenting on Steem.)

This may interest you as well

That video looks manipulated to me - do you have an original source for it? Thanks

I just took the link from youtube!
what makes you think it has been manipulated? are you saying you think its fake?

I have watched a lot of 'deepfake' videos that are very high quality and I know that anyone can be 'faked' to a high degree of accuracy now - both face and voice. In this particular video the movement of the face is stunted and there seem to be parts that jump around. The low resolution of the video means that fakery could be hidden more easily.

@tipu curate

Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 2/6)