Predictions of "conspiracy theorists" vs. Mainstream "Experts"

Let me recap the events of the last 2 years.
Lets lay out some predictions of us anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist doo-doohead nazis. It all started december, maybe allready november 2019. Thats when some people started warning about some virus in wuhan. The chines government and your experts at the WHO denied everything. We warned about it and memed about their denial, saying "its just a flu" to pictures with people in full body biohazard gear.

We were dangerous conspiracy theorists for that. And i dont believe you now still stand by your experts and claim that it is nothing or under control.
And i do fully understand that more information was gathered, but that data confirmed our hypothethis.

Conspiracy theorists 1 - "Experts" 0

Then it came to italy which actualy proved it to be more harmless than one may fear from an unknown virus, certainly less harmful than i wouldve thought. But still, enough to get many people to wear masks.
Many experts said we shouldnt be wearing them at that point, i will not count that against them becouse a "should" is not a scientific claim, however, there were some experts that even claimed they wouldnt work. So ill have to deduct 0.1 point from you. I think thats fair.
Conspiracy Theorists 1 - "Experts" -0.1

However, the real reason i like to remind you of this is that it shows that you do not need mandates to get people to wear masks. On the contrary people will get entrenched against them if you do mandate it which you are responsible for, your "experts" sadly were never from the fields relevant for any policy decissions. Those fields are politics and economics, not medicin, sorry, medical doctors are not even the relevant experts for policy.

Then the imperial college published its ideas, the supression plan which proposed a lockdown until the vast majority is vaccinated (they expected this to take at least 18 months) with obviously intermittent openings to avoid the virus and other viruses being to strongly supressed (which... would lead to issues if you come out of it eventualy) being the one the world ran with.

At this moment in time i had no disagreements on factual grounds. I was against it, but thats simply becouse i want health, justice, security and law to be private and entirely determined by free markets. But in terms of results at the point it seemed like it could work.
Let me remind you, however, what the goal of this supression was. The goal was to keep ICUs under capacity. Now why you wouldnt have built a lot more and hired a lot more employees by now but instead are firering people who refuse the jab is beyond me. Just let them build their private unvaccianted hospitals? Whats the problem?
But i get ahead of myself.
What we learnt over the course of the next months and knew by summer or autumn 2020 was that in fact even natural immunity didnt last all that long. Not only that, it also infects other animals than humans. Most other mammals infact. Either of those 2 facts would be bad news for vaccines, in combination they meant you can entirely forget that original plan.
Yet theres politics involved. Nobody wanted to admit to the implications of the new information, certainly no politician.
So we continued on that path.
And we can confirm, indeed it did not work.
Conspiracy theorists 2 - "Experts" -0.1

Another prediction that came out of that is that of course we would never get rid of covid, but it would evolve which is a good thing becouse that makes it more infectious but less deadly over time. We were right on that too, if delta did not end the pandemic, omicron will. By now it is endemic.
Conspiracy theorists 3 - "Experts" -0.1

In that time we also started warning about potential vaccine passports, where decried as CTs for it and turned out right on that, too.
Conspiracy theorists 4 - "Experts" -0.1

Personaly i slowly started worrying about genocide. Which certainly in some places of the world you now need to scan a QR-code to enter many places, including places which sell food. And not everbody has a cellphone, so you are starving those that dont.
Conspiracy theorists 5 "Experts" -0.1

As vaccines became available, we started trying to vaccinate many people. Even while knowing that the vaccine is not perfect and even natural immunity doesnt last all that long as well as other mammals carry the virus. Now, if you understand the first thing about evolution you SHOULD understand that you should not vaccinate the masses in such a scenario. You should vaccinate the vulnerable. The only thing you achieve by vaccinating everyone is that if a vaccine resistant strain evolves - and it will - that it will become dominant, making the vaccination of the vulnerable pointless. The same way that giving everyone antibiotics may in the shortterm reduce bacterial infections but in the longterm will make your antibiotics useless where you wouldve needed them. "but this is a virus not a bacterium" is what your lot said, without pointing out any differences in the selection pressures.
We were also correct on that one.
Conspiracy theorists 6 "Experts" -0.1