The Old Bait & Switch: COVID-19 "New Cases" & "Record Cases" Are Just Baseless Fear-Mongering

in #informationwar5 months ago (edited)

| ▶️ Watch on LBRY | ▶️ Watch on Flote | ▶️ Watch on YT |


So, according to the current count (from Worldometers), the USSA has 11,021,049 "cases" of the Rona so far.

The most of any country in the world.

Second place is India, with 8,773,243 "cases."

That means that India has 79.6% the number of cases as the USSA.

But the number of "cases" is a direct result of the number of tests given, right? (For this experiment we are going to ignore the SO SO many flaws with the use of PCR for diagnosis, and the outright fraud admitted to around these "case" numbers) So, how many tests have these two countries given?

USSA: 164,367,862 tests
India: 123,101,739 tests

Ok, so India has administered 74.89% the number of tests that the USSA has. That sure seems close the the same as the difference in "cases," doesn't it?

Let's look at what portion of their slaves each of these syndicates has tested:

USSA: 164,367,862 tests out of 331,716,877 population = 49.55% of population tested.
India: 123,101,739 tests out of 1,384,974,946 population = 8.88% of population tested.

Think the USSA actually has more people with that RNA in their system than India does?


Yes, to be clear, these "positive" results are for a strand of RNA, which may or may not be related to sars-cov-2 infection. They are in no way indicative of COVID-19 (disease with symptoms), or anything else. Just fraud & fear-mongering.

Back many many months ago, there was a clear differentiation between "positive tests" and COVID-19 cases. They were also intentionally not testing people, and telling people to assume they had it if they got the flu.

The ONLY people being tested for months were those hospitalized (because that's how the hospitals got the increased $$), and that allowed them to spin the narrative that this was some extremely harmful and deadly disease. Once the masses accepted that narrative, they started testing more and more people (more tests in the USSA every week now than in all of March - May)

This allows them to keep announcing "record cases," and people think that means a record amount of illness, hospitalization, and deaths... which means more fear, better sales numbers for their injections, and more willingness from the masses to give up their freedoms.


This breakdown from the Swiss Policy Research Group goes into just some of the biggest issues with the use of PCR as a diagnostic tool: https://swprs.org/the-trouble-with-pcr-tests/

If you start using some basic search terms like "PCR inaccuracy," "PCR false positive," "PCR false negative," "Paw Paw test positive for COVID," or just reading through any of the documents from the CDC, WHO, or other organized crime pharmaceutical cartels, you'll see that they have been very open & honest about the low quality of these tests and the fact that a positive result in no way indicates current (or any) infection with sars-cov-2.

To be clear - DO NOT read articles by "fact checkers" or other paid shills: look at the actual documents from those agencies, and you will see that the media is the only one selling these lies - they don't match up to the science in any way.


My Social Medias

https://peakd.com/@kennyskitchen
https://flote.app/kennyskitchen
https://odysee.com/@kennyskitchen:9
https://lbry.tv/@kennyskitchen:9

My Referral Link for LBRY/Odysee

https://lbry.tv/$/invite/@kennyskitchen:9



bipcot.jpg


For Proper Thumbnails

Sort:  

I suggest it's worse than that.  I suggest that the idea of pulling this off started a century or more ago.  When the electron microscope was first developed, there had already been hypothesized a "bug," even as far back as ancient Greece.  When They saw the exosome, They jumped to the conclusion They had found the "bug."  Rockefeller saw the usefulness of the theory both in terms of the fear factor it created and in the pharma profits He could amass.

Beauchamp disagreed with the germ theory, and did experiments trying to pass "disease" from a sick One and a well One, and failed every time, to include injecting bodily fluids.  But Rocky and cohorts had the bucks, the publishing, the media, the universities, and all, and ran with teaching the germ theory as truth.

Now, it is true that living organisms may cause issues, bacteria, fungi, etc.  But it's not true that there are "deadly viruses."

And then, the question comes up...  How do the diseases spread, if not by a bug?  When One grasps that diseases like "flu," "colds," and such are the detoxification of Our bodies, that there are good times of the year to detox, and that We are electromagnetic Beings, and communicate on that level, when One "sees" that it is a good time, that is communicated to Others.

This explains why Some in a family will get sick, and Others do not - They don't need to detox.

Anyway, good point that "cases" means zero.  It's part of the Rockefeller and cohorts' efforts to fear Us into Their full control.

That was excellent. It's always uplifting to hear the truth even if it's on a rather negative topic.
I'm looking for a logical way to help people understand what's going on. I'm not sure it's possible.

(because that's how the hospitals got the increased $$)

Creating world theories based on a single country's health system is obviously flawed in the extreme. The other major flaw is basing your hypothesis purely around people tested. This obviously doesn't take into account people who haven't been tested and who may or may not had this virus, thus negating your numbers completely.
Thousands of people around the world in hospital on ventilators and millions of people affected either indirectly might disagree with your nonsense, as might a 34-year-old friend with no known, or discovered previous medical conditions and another friend's 67year-old grandmother who are both now dead.

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of your numbers and the testing methodology, the hospitals are full of people who are very ill, this is a fact. This is a very serious issue so I can't work out your agenda for creating any attempt you can to play it down.

What makes your 'truth' any better than anyone else's?

If you go back and read the many, many posts I've made about this fraud since it started, you'll see that I've looked at all the research, statistics, official statements, test inserts, etc. For far too long. I actually stopped paying attention completely because the fraud is so obvious and there's no reason to waste head space on it - but yesterday this idea of "record cases" (in the US specifically) popped up in a few different conversations. So I decided to address it.

Thanks for being among us, and for doing the work. Peace.