Justice in a Society Of Ethical Sovereigns (SOES)

in #informationwar8 months ago

Justice in a Society Of Ethical Sovereigns (SOES).png

First, in a society of Ethical sovereigns, where the archaic tool called “money” has been put down and the wealth that is Humanity’s returned to Us, We must look to who the leaders are.  In such a society, where problems are Ethically solved for, rather than untold numbers of legalates that Some enFORCE on Others (drawing psychopaths for the power over Others it offers), the leaders in society are the Ones who jump to solve a problem if They can help with a solution.

Reputation is earned, and fame, for the best solution manifest, thus motivating Many to learn all They can about problems They would love to solve for.  Like helping sick People, and engineering, and other such things.

There is no permanent leader over all things, but leaders of the moment emerge for each problem.

Though in such a society there is scant motive the break the three Laws – why would You steal when You can have what You want freely?  Why defraud?  Why hurt or kill Others against Their will? – no doubt there will be cases where One creates a problem by virtue of having broken one or more of the three Laws of Ethics.


A jealous lover might kill the competition.  Interpersonal issues may create problems – there’s little We can do to solve for those completely, but with no exchanging to survive, no money needed, far less pressure and stress will be seen.  This, in turn, will mellow the society, create more happiness and satisfaction.  In turn, far less rage and anger arise.

But Let’s say someOne did murder anOther.  Here is a problem.  The One(s) discovering the murder starts recording everything, calling for Others to help investigate.  Those who love such investigation, trained in techniques and procedures, come and record everything, too.  Out of these Ones, One will emerge as the leader.

It may be the first investigator, or another with high reputation, or One with great charisma…  One will emerge as the coordinator.


All evidence is gathered, with Some choosing to livestream what They’re doing.  And all evidence found is shared on the web.  The culprit (or any highly suspect), when found, is subdued by Those who love that challenge, and kept in confinement while the evidence is reviewed by All who care.  And given murder will be so rare, such a case will draw millions to look at the evidence and determine if They think the accused is guilty, based on the evidence.

Virtually 100% will not have a bias, will not have an interest beyond solving for the problem created.

When investigation is complete, and Those who care have input Their evaluation, if 80% or more find guilt, the accused will garner any Ethical consequence chosen by Those who care.  50% or more will define the actual consequences.

It could be anything that does not break the three Laws.


I imagine that setting Them up in a confinement that requires at least One a day who cares pressing a button, and another 24 hours is added, will be a popular Ethical solution.  When there are no more who care and the button is not pressed, the confinement unlocks and the prisoner is freed.

But any creative idea that is Ethical is acceptable.

And if 50% or more cannot agree on the consequences for the convicted, there’s a problem to solve for.  One way or another, Those involved will solve for this problem.  All in all, as problems arise, Ethical solutions are found.

Three Laws of Ethics.png

So what are these Laws?  If You are familiar with My work, You likely are not asking, but for any not yet familiar:

1.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3.  Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

All these things done constitutes “evil.”  And I have found nothing outside of these things that Most would give that descriptor to.

So, if any problems arise from these procedures described above...People will solve for them.

For more of My work, please see:

Society Of Ethical Sovereigns - The Education:  https://hive.blog/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/society-of-ethical-sovereigns-the-education

To All Who Seek to Better Our Planet:  https://hive.blog/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/to-all-who-seek-to-better-our-planet

We Ethical Sovereigns:  https://hive.blog/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/we-ethical-sovereigns

And My playlist on Odysee:

Is Money Evil?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/is-money-evil:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72




Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar

My father taught Me never to believe anything.  He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data.  He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouToilet).  From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw.  So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles.  I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics.  I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY.  Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY.  We were accounting for Our energy input into things.  And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too.  And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths.  Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene.  Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked...  If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them?  I think You can figure out what answer I came up with.  And would that explain what I see?  Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy.  If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy? 

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather...  I am a conspiracy analyst.  And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.  That explains perfectly what I see.

Love always.