RE: My reply to @branbello's rant about HiveBuzz's level classification

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

So far, I really like the ranks. It's easy for me to understand from a crypto perspective. And even if redfish and minnow are reversed in size, it's still an easily digestible chart.

I took a look at the hive-based animal chart he suggested and it's not really as easy to roll off the tongue. And Asian Giant Hornet kind of evokes a more menacing vibe than the neutral whale. Whales can be good or bad.

I would support a hive-based creature chart if it rolled off the tongue a little easier.

hivebuzz
0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar

I guess we can be creative and find funny and easy to say names within the bee ecosystem, but we might miss the main goal of our "level" classification: to create a clear association with the amount of staked HIVE and the weight (understand influence) it has on the ecosystem.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

That's true. I'm not sure how many life stages bees have but I don't think there's enough to cover all the levels lol. Larvae, Drone, Worker Bee, Queen Bee? Might not be as appealing for folks who don't want to be called "Queen Bee" XD

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Queen bee? I don't know if it's worse to be called a drone? 😓 In my country it means lazy 🤭

0
0
0.000
Reply