This seems more like a new EIP + Feature Requests that is focused on improving the native token fundamentals, as well as boosting adoption. Fair enough.
While, I agree with the vision, for these particular action items, I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I know that seems like a joke/meme statement on my part, but I really could go with these proposed ideas or just skip them. Or cherry-pick them, doesn't matter.
I don't think fiddling with the economics will make any difference to the price or adoption. I also don't think leaving it the way it is will really matter either.
I also don't have a better idea, but that doesn't mean we should or shouldn't do this.
Having said that, I do think we have plenty of tools already. I think it's possible to have a vision without changing much consensus at all. But what that vision looks like, I don't know.
If I seem like I'm contradicting myself in the same reply, I apologize.