Ex Pfizer Science Chief: COVID19 Shots Are Killing Many People & Deaths Are Being Covered Up

avatar
(Edited)

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


Dr. Mike Yeadon is an Ex head at Pfizer, one of the manufacturers of the COVID19 shots.
Here He States That Deaths From COVID19 Shots are Huge and Being Covered Up, Plus Numerous Other Worrying Observations.

Mike previously served as the chief scientist and vice-president of the allergy and respiratory research division of the drug company Pfizer. Pfizer is one of the pharmaceutical companies responsible for the creation of the experimental COVID19 shots currently being used globally.
He has been a vocal critic of the science and politics surrounding the use of the COVID19 shots and in this latest video he makes clear that he suspects they are being used to achieve nefarious goals and their use is not backed by by proper science.

Summary of his points:

  • He worked over 3 decades in the pharmaceutical industry to create medicines.
  • Usually he supports vaccine technology, but not the COVID19 shots.
  • The COVID19 shots are not based on traditional vaccine technology. They are unique and have never been used on humans before.
  • The shots cause the creation of spike proteins (antigen) in the body, which in turn causes blood clots wherever they express.
  • The shots may cause some people to create many more spike proteins in their bodies than others - meaning some people may be fine but some may come to harm.
  • No proper dose ranging studies were performed for COVID19 shots.
  • The rapid development of the shots means that some steps were not completed in their development. A complete failure of regulatory process.
  • Proper safety studies have been performed - including on the children of pregnant women.
  • The shots have not been approved, the trials are ongoing - meaning that the public are being experimented.
  • Emergency Use Authorisation of experimental shots depends on the absence of alternative treatments. There are numerous successful treatments = "it is the most treatable respiratory virus ever".
  • Shots do not achieve an acceptable risk/benefit profile.
  • Fully informed consent has not been achieved. Ommission of information and coercion through pentalties invalidate medical ethics.
  • Forced injections are coming if you do not object to the situation.
  • The vaccines should never have been rolled out.
  • PCR Testing is flawed. The PCR tests were used to measure whether the shots work, so the data on the shots is inaccurate.
  • Elderly and sick people were not included in the clinical trials, so those in the population being given the shots are the test subjects.
  • Many people died when the vaccines were rolled out and it was covered up.
  • Effects of the shots include deep vein thrombosis, myocarditis, blindness & blood clots.
  • Number of deaths following the shots is 60 times higher than the normal rate for vaccines.



Wishing you well,
Ura Soul






Read My User Guide for Hive Here


You Can Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!

Click the big black button below:

ura soul witness vote for hive


View My Witness Application Here

View Some of My Witness Related Posts

Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.

Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as PeakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!

I am founder of an ethical Digital Marketing Agency called @crucialweb. We help our clients to grow and innovate online and offer discounts for decentralised projects. Get in touch if you'd like to work with us.

ureka.org
I run a Social network for healing, balancing and evolving too. Meet compassionate co-creators of reality, learn, share & make life better!

▶️ 3Speak



0
0
0.000
26 comments
avatar

That is fake news.
Stop, you are undermining Hive credibility with this bullshit
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are many very qualified people stating very similar to Dr. Yeadon. This is a free speech network intended to facilitate the allowance of voices that provide others with opportunity to think for themselves rather than simply regurgitate mainstream media narratives.

"40% of Autopsied Covid19 Deaths Within 2 Weeks of Vaccination Were Caused BY Vaccine" - Top German Pathologist

"COVID19 Shots Are A Crime Against Humanity" - US Expert in Virology & Immunology.

COVID19 Shots May Have Killed 40,000+ Within 72 Hours: Class Action Lawyer For 1st Responders In USA

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is a couple dozen attention seeking people against 99% of the scientists in the world.

You have the right to express your opinion, but odds are that your opinion are wrong in the face of facts.

The unquestionable fact is the number of deaths before and after covid. The raw deaths data. The vaccines unquestionably reduced the number of deaths.

2 months after the vaccination started the deaths declined meaningfully.

vaccines

Opinion is cheap. Show me the charts.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your graph contains no source, does not display even the most basic information necessary to assess it and worst of all refers to 'cases' of COVID19 - yet the vaccines do not prevent cases of COVID19 - they only lessen symptoms (at best). Your graph shows an unknown region and makes zero reference to mortality and so is of no relevance in terms of assessing the risk profile of the shots.

Please refer to these three recent posts of mine which contain a variety of relevant graphs and stats.

Deeper Dive: Are Vaccines Causing Dangerous Variants of COVID19 & Increasing Mortality? (Follow Up)

How Accurate Is the Data For Injury From COVID Vaccines In Government Vaccine Injury Trackers?

Science Shows COVID19 Vaccines May Increase Transmission & Drive Variants. Cases Often Increase After Vaccine Drives.

You can see from the various graphs that deaths quite often increase following vaccine drives. The measurement of the cases in your graph, aside from being essentially meaningless in this context is extra meaningless since the 'cases' are being calculated using highly flawed PCR processes.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I think fundamentally there is a problem.
Already more than 3 billion people have been vaccinated and are alive.
This happens because the calculation of possible losses (deaths) occurs when mass operations are done. It also happens with war, it is calculated that there can be deaths but if the risk is less than the benefits, we can continue.
It also happens with mass vaccinations and vaccination remains the only real solution (working for most of the living beings) against a virus.
The problem, which perhaps continues to be missed by many people, is that:

  • claiming one's own rights (claiming that the rights of others are equal to one's own)
  • allow everyone to think for themselves (telling them not to vaccinate)
  • cite websites all colored, of uncertain reliability and credibility guarantee (claiming that they are the source of truth just because they are not pate of the main media stream)

AND WRITE ALL THIS on decentralized and secondary social networks because they offer the freedom to avoid banning

it serves no purpose.
because :

  • these absolute "truths"
  • this cry to stop vaccinations
  • this evidence that many people die

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TELL US!!!

We do NOT care about "your absolute truths" when:
-already over 3 billion people are vaccinated and doing just fine.

  • there is no microchip inserted in the blood with vaccinations.
  • there is no secret plan to put the 5G in our body.

WE ALL KNOW that we are all different and we all respond to care differently, we are not identical replicated objects.
so there are deaths, but by the law of BIG NUMBERS, the best solution remains worldwide vaccination.

do you understand?
no need to write on social, telling us.
if you want to change things you have to tell the competent authorities.
if they don't listen to you, you have already lost.

it is useless to say it inside Hive to gather followers, inside your social network, inside Facebook or Twitter.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO TELL US.
PROVE YOUR THEORIES AND YOUR DOCUMENTS TO THE APPROPRIATE PEOPLE.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This happens because the calculation of possible losses (deaths) occurs when mass operations are done. It also happens with war, it is calculated that there can be deaths but if the risk is less than the benefits, we can continue.

Statistics can be calculated to give all kinds of impressions depending on what is included and what is omitted. I am sharing evidence that the calculations you are referring to are grossly inaccurate.

It also happens with mass vaccinations and vaccination remains the only real solution (working for most of the living beings) against a virus.

There are many doctors and scientific studies that show successful and safe treatment for COVID19 using traditional drugs, not these experimental mRNA shots. So your assumption here is incorrect.

The problem, which perhaps continues to be missed by many people, is that:

claiming one's own rights (claiming that the rights of others are equal to one's own)
allow everyone to think for themselves (telling them not to vaccinate)

Are you seriously complaining that people claim human rights and think for themselves? I suggest you think about what you are saying here. You literally sound like a dictator, powered by denial and evil.

cite websites all colored, of uncertain reliability and credibility guarantee (claiming that they are the source of truth just because they are not pate of the main media stream)

Your logic is flawed. No-one is saying that information is true simply because it disagrees with main stream. As long as you refuse to think for yourself, your logic will be biased towards whoever is doing your thinking for you. If you refuse to think for yourself, you won't be able to make sense of this information.

so there are deaths, but by the law of BIG NUMBERS, the best solution remains worldwide vaccination.

Can you please point me to the definition of 'the law of big numbers'? It's not a law I am familiar with.

if you want to change things you have to tell the competent authorities.
if they don't listen to you, you have already lost.

So.. The doctors and researchers I am highlighting are stating that the governments censor and deny their science. You are then saying that I should speak to the people in government who have already shown themselves to be science deniers. You then say that if the people who are already known to deny truth and science will not listen to me then I can't achieve anything. So you are declaring that nothing can be done to change the situation (you also say that nothing should be changed because you already know I am wrong).

it is useless to say it inside Hive to gather followers, inside your social network, inside Facebook or Twitter.

I already reach the mainpage of Hive with most posts and have a lot of followers - because I have covered many stories for years, uncovering denied truth and am generally well respected here. Your suggestion that I am posting in order to 'gather followers' is a disgusting and even slanderous claim. I suggest you think more carefully about what your words are doing to your profile here.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO TELL US.
PROVE YOUR THEORIES AND YOUR DOCUMENTS TO THE APPROPRIATE PEOPLE.

You can mute my profile, that's what the mute button is for.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No...
I am not muting you. dialogue is not muting people.
You are proving a theory based on some doctors and scientists (1, 10, 100, 200) saying "A".

the problem is that the world is re-rotating with as many doctors and scientists saying "B".

this makes the problem, as you put it in the way:

  • "be careful, this scientist says the vaccine is a danger!"
  • "open your eyes, I show you the truth, I don't say it ...this scientist says it"

has the same value on the other side of the fence, because there are scientists and doctors who act, have studied, are respected doctors that save lives every day.

As for the note about "followers"...forgive me, I misspoke.
I didn't mean "social network followers"...more like an "army against big pharma".

the law of "large numbers" is that law that says that many lives are worth more than a few lives, although every life is important.
we are living in a globalized era. as you can see something happens in china (or another place)
, and boom... problems can happens everywhere.
it's not about american people.. chinese people, australian people... this or that government...

we live on a planet already fucked up with our own hands.

you worry about the fact that the vaccine hurts a few people, but probably (I don't know you, I'm trying to guess) you pollute the sea and fish with microplastics too, you pollute the air with your car, you smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol ...and destroy yourself...but society pays your medicine with taxes.
and "you" don't realize it in "your "everyday life.
you probably accumulate bitcoins and the whole process of bitcoin creation generates pollution.

we're already two weeks into using the planet's resources for this year.
we need 5 planets "Earth" to rebalance everything we have consumed. we are destroyng our planet, consuming it with our food waste, over technology needs...and every stupid thing we love..
everything has a cost... and planet is suffering.
so...
what I mean is that claiming to find justice by calling in some doctors under the "today spotlight", when the same number of doctors say the opposite, doesn't make much sense.
moreover, you also rely on the knowledge of others (doctors/scientists)... which does not make you "better" than those who do vaccinate relying to other doctors/scientists.
and I repeat... there are already 3 billion vaccinated people alive.
:)

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are proving a theory based on some doctors and scientists (1, 10, 100, 200) saying "A".

I have not said I have proven anything - I am simply leaving a record of evidence and testimony on an immutable blockchain that would otherwise be censored and lost. Science requires open access to information or it is corrupted.

the problem is that the world is re-rotating with as many doctors and scientists saying "B".

This is not really a problem to me as this is common in science. Disagreement is part of the scientific process by design. There is a challenge in the sense that proving the absolute truth requires discernment and perhaps further research.

has the same value on the other side of the fence, because there are scientists and doctors who act, have studied, are respected doctors that save lives every day.

People disagree in large numbers, yes. There are respected doctors who totally disagree with each other here, yes. They are both alleged to save lives.

As for the note about "followers"...forgive me, I misspoke.
I didn't mean "social network followers"...more like an "army against big pharma".

I see, no problem. I am not aiming to create armies or conflict - I am aiming to facilitate free thinking and to help empower people to make decisions based on all available information, rather than only on part of the information which is biased.

the law of "large numbers" is that law that says that many lives are worth more than a few lives, although every life is important.

Wikipedia's page on the law of large numbers refers mathematically to the accuracy of trials increasing the more there are of them. This has nothing to do with the valuation of individual human lives.

we live on a planet already fucked up with our own hands.

Many people are seriously injured and in denial, that has resulted in the planet being pushed out of balance as far as is possible. We need to heal, balance and evolve now.

you worry about the fact that the vaccine hurts a few people, but probably (I don't know you, I'm trying to guess) you pollute the sea and fish with microplastics too, you pollute the air with your car, you smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol ...and destroy yourself...but society pays your medicine with taxes.

You are incorrect. I advocate for healing, balancing and evolving. I have been vegan since 2007, so no animals or fish for me. I avoid using plastic as much as I can, I didn't have a car for about 7 years and even stopped using money during that period too. In the end my parents both got sick from their own toxicity and I had no choice but to start again in order to care for them. I learned how to detox and heal myself in 2007 and have not used medicine or hospitals since then. I do not smoke and rarely drink alcohol (maybe once a year). Taxation is theft and I advocate for total cessation of taxation. FYI, Steem and Hive are based on anarcho capitalist principles.

you probably accumulate bitcoins and the whole process of bitcoin creation generates pollution.

No, I don't. I regularly advise people to move away from Bitcoin. I am a witness on Hive. Hive's proof of stake mechanism is far more energy efficient than Bitcoin's proof of work algorithm. I have had a degree in systems engineering for over 20 years and am well aware of the factors involved here.

Most of your ideas about me here are guesses that aren't based in reality and that can be easily seen to be wrong with about 10 minutes of scrolling on my profile and posts. I any case, I am not sure what they have to do with the topic of vaccines anyway.

we need 5 planets "Earth" to rebalance everything we have consumed. we are destroyng our planet, consuming it with our food waste, over technology needs...and every stupid thing we love..
everything has a cost... and planet is suffering.

The planet is suffering. The people are suffering, yes. The pharmaceutical industry is essentially the oil industry and collectively they are major wings of the systems that are most polluting the world. When we place responsibility for ourselves outside of ourselves, into others and into machines/factories/corporations, we disconnect ourselves from the divine strength, connection and awareness that real balance requires us to embody. This is so heavily denied at present on Earth that the future looks perilous for most of us.

what I mean is that claiming to find justice by calling in some doctors under the "today spotlight", when the same number of doctors say the opposite, doesn't make much sense.

The truth has nothing to do with the number of people speaking it. The truth is simply accurate understanding that can be demonstrated repeatedly. In nazi Germany in WW2 it was very popular to think that Germans were a super-race with a destiny of world domination. Maybe the majority thought that back then. It didn't work out well for them and it wasn't truth.

moreover, you also rely on the knowledge of others (doctors/scientists)... which does not make you "better" than those who do vaccinate relying to other doctors/scientists.

I have never claimed to be 'better' than anyone. I actually rely on my own knowledge and understanding for me personally, but because many other people will only listen to Doctors, I share their message rather than rely on my own. Most people who trust my own personal discernment have already learned to trust their own inner process and wisdom too - so we meet on an equal footing. I do not seek to be above anyone and I also do not promote others above me either.

When we think for ourselves, the logical fallacy of 'appeal to authority' is no longer part of our own self deception and denial.

and I repeat... there are already 3 billion vaccinated people alive.

If you listen to the warnings being put forward by the people in my posts and review the data provided, you will see that:

  • Warnings are issued for serious complications following these shots for up to 3 years. The trials for the shots is ongoing, there is no long term safety data. There are a few examples of vaccines from history causing lots of disease due to incomplete safety testing, such as has occurred here.

  • The graphs in my posts show that death rates often increase significantly once vaccines are introduced into a region. This cannot be denied without also taking responsibility for killing people yourself.

  • Your logic is a gross oversimplification of the scientific method, which is reckless at best.

E8_bKeEWQAEi526.jpg

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sorry, this chart is about an increase in covid deaths. Have the dead received the second dose of vaccine or are they people not yet vaccinated?

0
0
0.000
avatar

the chart logs new deaths. the number of new deaths logged went very high immediately after the authorisation of the rollout of the booster shot.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

so... are you suggesting that people died of fright as soon as the third vaccination was activated?

In Italy, we are witnessing a new increase in cases of intensive hospitalization. these are all those people who have refused the vaccine previously or who have not yet been vaccinated.

Regarding your commitment to "offer" a different way of interpreting and looking at the numbers and possible alternatives to what is "forcibly" indicated by all the states of the world, in the name of scientific research ... IS OK.
But the "good act" ends the moment you are not the one offering a different view, but alarming the people by saying that they are wrong.
That they should not follow the information of scientist "A", rather they should follow that of scientist "B".

You say you give freedom to others to see the news, offering an alternative.
But it always seems that you actually want that alternative to be perceived as "truth" and that the masses of the world's peoples are getting their vaccinations wrong.

(It's my opinion, of course, but it sounds like this)
"Beware! vaccines kill!"
"Look! the numbers say that vaccinated people are dying."
"Are you sure what you are being injected with? this scientist says..."

This way of doing things is not "informing people".
It is rather "alarming" to basically create a counter-movement, exactly equal, not better.
If you want to allow others freedom of opinion, don't "lead" them on with alarmism.

A practical example: me.
I did the double dose of Pfizer. I never contracted the virus because I was careful with the rules.
in spite of this, by getting the vaccination, my body could react badly without my knowing it beforehand.
Because no state did a personal screening for every citizen.
This was also calculated among the risks.
It means that I could have died too.

but if I had died, things would not have changed.
It's correct to vaccinate and there are 3 billion healthy and vaccinated people who can live with protection from a new virus.

Now with alarmistic messages from people "warning the world population about vaccine" to let it "think" by itself... how could I feel?
What is the purpose? make us feel bad or stupid because we had a double dose?

My personal opinion.

---edit:
trying to be more clear...

if you publish:
"COVID19 Shots Are A Crime Against Humanity" - US Expert in Virology & Immunology.

it has the same value as a (fake example!!!):

"Dr. Anthony Fauci World-renowned scientist says vaccinating Fighting Covid-19 is the Best Choice for Humanity" - American physician-scientist and immunologist serving as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President.

See?

0
0
0.000
avatar

are you suggesting that people died of fright as soon as the third vaccination was activated?

The pattern shown in Israel is a repeat the pattern that has been demonstrated in my previous posts, that includes perhaps 90 countries. The vaccines are rolled out and deaths go up shortly afterwards. In some island nations there were zero deaths from covid until the vaccines were introduced and then deaths went up right away. Correlation is not causation, but we would have to be deeply in denial to not be concerned about what the data shows us.

In Italy, we are witnessing a new increase in cases of intensive hospitalization. these are all those people who have refused the vaccine previously or who have not yet been vaccinated.

What is the source of the data you are referring to substantiate your claim here?
As far as I am aware, the majority of COVID19 cases are based on the 'delta' variant which the vaccines do not protect from. I am seeing plenty of data showing vaccinated people are being hospitalised too.

But the "good act" ends the moment you are not the one offering a different view, but alarming the people by saying that they are wrong.

So it's good to point out data and testimonies that differ from the mainstream narrative, but not when the conclusion is that the mainstream is dangerously wrong?
So it's OK to think differently as long as the conclusion is that nothing changes?

That they should not follow the information of scientist "A", rather they should follow that of scientist "B".

I don't recall ever saying that anyone should follow anyone. I simply amplify voices that are censored.

You say you give freedom to others to see the news, offering an alternative.
But it always seems that you actually want that alternative to be perceived as "truth" and that the masses of the world's peoples are getting their vaccinations wrong.

There are some parts to this situation that I am certain about and in those cases I will speak as such. There is nothing wrong with someone having certainty and sharing their perspective. This is what almost everyone is doing who studies the topic and speaks publicly. The majority of people will not base their health decisions on a blog on the internet, but will either ask their Doctor or will think for themselves and do their own research. I am all for people thinking for themselves, doing research and furthering human understanding. I study history and am old enough to know that blind faith inevitably leads to suffering.

This way of doing things is not "informing people". It is rather "alarming" to basically create a counter-movement, exactly equal, not better. If you want to allow others freedom of opinion, don't "lead" them on with alarmism.

The situation and information is alarming. There is no way to state these ideas that is not alarming - unless I say that the testimonies and data are all fake. The entire government response and vaccine rollout policies are based entirely on panic and alarm. Why would anyone listen to an alternative view when they are already alarmed by the governments, if the alternative view is not being realistic about their existing alarm and panic.

No-one wants alarm and panic. I am not intending to create new alarm and panic, I am simply aiming to provide the full spectrum of evidence during a time of panic so that people can reduce harm and get all of the information.

but if I had died, things would not have changed.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you would have died from the vaccination and enough people cared about you, your death could prevent the death of other innocent people from the vaccine.

It's correct to vaccinate and there are 3 billion healthy and vaccinated people who can live with protection from a new virus.

These shots do not protect from the numerous variants that are going to keep emerging. They are 'leaky' meaning that they are badly designed. They do not match the efficacy of previous generations of vaccines that do not use mRNA technology. Neither of us are in a position to decide what is 'correct' for anyone but ourselves. On the one hand you don't want me to say what is right in terms of vaccination for other people, but on the other hand you are doing exactly that yourself.

What is the purpose? make us feel bad or stupid because we had a double dose?

The purpose is to help humanity reach truth. I can't do anything about the fact that so many have already had an injection. I am not blaming those who have been injected - if they feel 'stupid' or 'bad' then that is down to their own self judgement, not from judgements coming from me.

it has the same value as a (fake example!!!):

These issues are complex, they are more than headlines. Science is not about comparing headlines, there are details here that need to be understood.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes Delta cases.
I see your point but I think it is not accurate to say that the current vaccine is powerless against the Delta. In the same way it is not verified that Other solution are effective. The world scientific community has already determined the best path to follow (for the rule of big numbers, wikipedia or not wikipedia)...
I have no data charts here (I'm busy around at the moment) but I'll look for it

0
0
0.000
avatar

Here is a study that shows that the current Pfizer shots are around 80% less effective against Delta. This is because the shots were based only on a small amount of RNA, not the entire genome of the virus. The shots can only identify the spike protein and if that mutates, then they fail. That is what has happened.

https://www.crick.ac.uk/news/2021-06-03_pfizer-biontech-vaccine-recipients-have-lower-antibody-levels-targeting-the-delta-variant-first-discovered-in-india

0
0
0.000
avatar

That report is based on RNA process so it's interesting to read...
I was reading about effectiveness in this different one...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2021/07/29/pfizer-covid-19-coronavirus-vaccine-effective-delta-variant/

we are talking about effectiveness (and, in a scientific way, to improve the method to fight mutations).
so, we can say Pfizer is protecting people at around 40% against Covid, not that is a "weapon of mass destruction".

sounds better, no?
it helps people to read and observe, better than "oh my gosh, that Dr. says they will kill us!"

:)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I add the latest summary report from ISS (Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Superior Institute of Health))

August 20, 2021

97.16% vaccine effectiveness against death among those who were immunized with two doses and those who did not have even one.
And almost 84% for those who had only one dose.
The figure is derived from the monitoring of the Iss (April 4 to August 15). As for the cases of death by age group, there were 65 cases among the over 80 unvaccinated against 40 of the vaccinated full cycle, 80 cases between 60-79 years against 6 of the vaccinated, 28 between 40-59 years against 2 of the vaccinated, 4 between 12-39 years against no death among those vaccinated with 2 doses.

source report:

https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/08/20/news/vaccini_mancano_all_appello_tanti_anziani_sanitari_e_docenti_ma_sale_l_adesione_fra_i_giovani-314686924/?ref=RHTP-BH-I314465804-P2-S1-T1

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the link. I am not familiar with the ISS data. We need to always look into the small print to see what rules were followed when calculating the totals since it is very clear that many countries (including Italy) have been including deaths that have nothing to do with COVID19 among the totals of deaths in COVID data. This is a topic that has been repeatedly exposed by many experts and numerous of my recent posts. The extensive legal document I just posted from Alabama, US goes into a lot of detail to explain some of the ways that the numbers are being manipulated.

97.16% vaccine effectiveness against death among those who were immunized with two doses and those who did not have even one.

The ABSOLUTE figures are what is important, not the RELATIVE figures. How many people die who have the vaccine vs. a similar control group of unvaccinated. The figures quoted in the article are neither explained nor are absolute figures.

As for the cases of death by age group, there were 65 cases among the over 80 unvaccinated against 40 of the vaccinated full cycle, 80 cases between 60-79 years against 6 of the vaccinated, 28 between 40-59 years against 2 of the vaccinated, 4 between 12-39 years against no death among those vaccinated with 2 doses.

The use of the words 'cases of death' is a bit confusing because it is normal for people reporting on COVID to use 'cases' to mean 'non death' and just 'death' to mean 'death'.
In any case, if we assume that they mean 'death' when they say 'cases', the numbers they have provided are meaningless without context. The only meaningful figures are 'cases per 100,000' of population or some other similar scale used to show a rate of cases and not just a straight count of cases.

If you had followed the meaning of my posts about the vaccines being the CAUSE of a lot of viral transmission and possibly putting pressure on the virus to create new variants, you would know that it is not surprising that unvaccinated people are dying in the wake of a large vaccination rollout. Vaccinated people become spreaders of the virus, which is a major threat to unvaccinated people.

I am sure the shots are capable of doing 'something' to prime immune systems for contact with SARS CoV2 spike proteins - however, the situation is very complicated and very detailed analysis needs to be done in order to understand the true picture here.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

the source of this information is certain?, my friend, we are talking about one of the pharmaceutical companies with the longest trajectory in the area worldwide.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not sure exactly what you are saying here. Michael Yeadon was previously high up in Pfizer himself, within the science wing there. Pfizer is one of the top 20 most heavily fined corporations for criminally lying to the public about the effectiveness of their drugs, having received multiple billion dollars worth of fines for deception in recent years.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617

0
0
0.000