UK Cardiologist: COVID19 Shots May Hugely Raise Risk of Heart Attack. Data Has Been Covered Up!

in COVID-197 months ago

▶️ Watch on 3Speak

High Profile Cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, states in this new interview on GB News that a recent study shows a dramatic increase in heart disease among those who have received an experimental COVID19 shot. A whistleblower told him that another study that showed the same has been buried to avoid losing funding from big pharma!

The study that Dr. Malhotra appears to be referencing is this one, published int he journal 'Circulation': Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning.
To quote the last paragraph of the study's abstract:

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

Fundamentally, the study is highlighting that heart disease and heart attack markers have more than doubled, from an 11% risk of heart disease within 5 years to a 25% risk among those post injection with COVID19 shots.
When we consider the number of people that have received the shots (billions), this potentially leaves us with a fallout within 5 years of an absolutely terrifyingly vast number of heart attacks and cases of heart disease.

Just as alarmingly, but totally in line with the evidence I have presented online for many years, Dr. Malhotra states that a whistleblower from another lab has contacted him telling him that they have seen similar results from their analysis, but they have chosen not to publish the data because THEY DON'T WANT TO LOSE FUNDING FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY!

Remember, this is not a random 'conspiracy theorist', this is one of the best known heart experts in the world. According to Wikipedia, he was listed as one of The Sunday Times 500 most influential people, identified as one of the top ten "Smart Set" in the London Evening Standard, and twice being recognized as one of the top 50 BME pioneers in the UK National Health Service.

Dr. Malhotra states that any vaccine mandates should be cancelled due to this data alone. "History will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it."

He also states that the stress of lockdowns and the reduction in dietary quality many people were forced into during lockdowns may have also played a part in the increased levels of heart disease markers. Arguably, these could have been avoided with a more logical and coherent strategy that did not rely on control and suppression of humanity.

The full abstract of the study that Dr. Malhotra is quoting is here:

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

Read My User Guide for Hive Here

Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!

Click the big black button below:

ura soul witness vote for hive

View My Witness Application Here

View Some of My Witness Related Posts

Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.

Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as PeakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!

I am founder of an ethical Digital Marketing Agency called @crucialweb. We help our clients to grow and innovate online and offer discounts for decentralised projects. Get in touch if you'd like to work with us.

The NFT Symposium
The NFT Symposium is a community space where NFT creators, artists, traders, enthusiasts & visionaries rub virtual shoulders, share ideas, start projects, grow together & learn.

Get paid to mine your imagination for the benefit of the entire NFT world:

▶️ 3Speak


Interview like this if not covered by mainstream media, people could easily dismiss it as "fake news" without even investigating its accuracy. It's really sad that many are willing to trade their freedom in the name of false security.

Exactly! I was going to say something along these lines too. But nice share @ura-soul. At least there are SOME speaking out and SOME waking up

The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at

Very overrewarded for simply an upload of a clip and some original text with barely any engagement even though it was probably trending with these votes.

some people take the time to consider life saving information, but many do not. the gravity of the content of this post is among the highest I have seen in years. there are plenty of other posts in trending currently that have been boosted similarly high in terms of rewards due to the price increase in hive, which have a similar level of comments too - yet no downvotes.

btw, curangel is downvoting 95% of my posts on day 6 at around 100% - which means that this will probably be zeroed, along with most of them - regardless of the content.

Just thinking. If this study is accurate, does it mean that we will see a confirmation of it by 2026?

I just shared the Circulation link to my family and my colleagues. Since all of my colleagues except one were all vaccinated, I am curious what would be their response?

Probably way earlier. In some areas you see an excess mortality already NOW which can´t be explained by COVID.

'Fact checkers' and other 'experts' have since been furiously posting on this topic and criticing the publication of the abstract without any data to back up it's statements. I'm fairly sure I've seen abstracts published in advance of the data before - but we'll see whether it ever sees the light of day.

 7 months ago (edited)Reveal Comment