RE: 300 'Doctors' Try to Cancel Joe Rogan? Events Mirrored by Attempted Execution Of A Radio Host in Uganda For Vax Dissent - Gov Was Proven Wrong!

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Team 'X' cancelling team 'Y' is now outraged team 'Y' is cancelling team 'X' and as team 'Y' cancels team 'X' team 'X' cancels team 'Y' as team 'X' cancels team 'Y' as team 'Y' cancels team 'X' and it just goes on like this as both 'X' and 'Y' act the exact same way yet have convinced themselves of being different.



0
0
0.000
24 comments
avatar

I don't really see rogan and malone cancelling anyone, they are just trying to put across their points and let people think for themselves.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I said team 'X' and team 'Y'. You filling in the blanks is called 'spin'.

Have a nice day.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Given the context of the post, applying logic it makes sense that you were suggesting that the teams were the characters highlighted in my post. If not then I'm not really sure what you comment means, other than pointing to the futility of trying to cancel people (without actually murdering them. lol).

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Once again, you're applying spin, not logic. Logical thing to do is ask a question when you don't understand, then wait for an answer. Unfortunately I don't feel like explaining. It is what it is.

In all seriousness, I highly doubt anyone will take out Rogan (definitely not physically). It's Spotify they're after. Apparently they think they're shareholders or on the board of directors or on the payroll or something and get to call the shots. Rogan does a fine job of brushing this shit off. You're probably more outraged than he is.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not outraged, this is totally par for the course and I wasn't expecting anyone to kill Rogan, though I have had personal death threats just for sharing publicly available scientific studies under a public pro vaccine thread way before COVID19. I'm just wanting to try to fill people in on what has been going on in the vaccine/pharma world that mostly never gets a mention.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

No need to explain. I've already proven I have a firm handle on the situation with my initial comment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

But you are still a prick...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! Anything else I can do for you today?

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can grasp the agenda and chew the fat...

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

You mean enter your bubble? Become an 'X' or a 'Y' then allow myself to be manipulated?

0
0
0.000
avatar

This may be barking up the wrong tree, but i get the impression that x means those who belive the covid narritive, and y means those who see it for the globalist bullshit it is.

Maybe you have the luxury of not yet having your life, country, or livelihood totally fucked over.

This is a wild ride, and we are all being manipulated.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I'm aware. X ÷ Y = Z

I don't want that Z shit in my head. The x and y's can keep it. They'll figure out Z sooner or later. They're just not as quick as N or G. Still too busy consuming; being fed. Won't notice until the plate is empty.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Much as I'd like to be theoretical, I'm playing for my life now because I would die before I'd submit to communism, globalism, or the death jab, and we are not fucking around here now. Even the memes are for real. In the past two years a lot has changed and it will never be the same again. For better or worse.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hopefully your answer to the end of the world isn't to just sit on the computer and watch it, leaving comments along the way.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You sure?

You mentioned a theoretical involving teams X and Y, insisting that any relation to the "pro-covid" and "anti-covid" narratives has nothing to do with what you said.

I for one, (and it seems that most other responders) have no clue what you meant, if not that. & I consider myself to be intelligent enough to read between the lines.

Not even mad, just trying to make sense of what you're trying to say.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Division existed long ago. It's not exclusive to covid. If there's something confusing you, there's always the '?'

You sure?

Yes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OK, there's always been division.
However, there have also been right sides (or less wrong, I guess) throughout history as well. So simply the matter of division is not an issue in and of itself.

So if not to point out that there are pro-covid and anti-covid camps, what was the point of your initial message?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nobody wants to take a moment to understand one another. It's also a media circus. Elements of showmanship due to the common behavioral patterns demonstrated on social media. Everyone wants to be bigger, better, bolder; silence or crush the opposition. 'Win' the end of the world. A spectacle for the ages.

A bit of sarcasm there. Society with its finger pointing, consistently oblivious to the three fingers pointed back at itself.

The sky is falling.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OK, I think I understand your point.

It is also why I don't consider myself "anti-vax", but rather "anti-covid" (so as not to point the finger at anyone). People can get the shot if they so choose, my fear is that due to the circumstances, it is no longer a choice in the purest sense but a "do this or else".

So even though I try to avoid "the sky is falling" mentalities, it truly does feel like there is a cultural war being fought - not with guns and ammo, but social coercion and silencing of opposition. Add to that economic instability, rapid social changes and encroachment on basic human rights... you cannot stay neutral on a moving train.

Joe will likely not be banned from Spotify (and even if he does, dude's a multi-millionaire) - but the ground is already set that those who are not "too big to fail" (like Joe) are more or less doomed to do so - unless they choose to go to fringe networks, where they will live in obscurity. A sort of shadow-ban, if you will.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wouldn't call myself neutral. Simply no desire to join in and say all the same things, think the things I'm 'supposed' to think, and whatever else. The 'news' and commentary based on news being passed off as news is just showbiz. I don't listen to the messages from either 'side'; prefer to watch the people, the reaction. Get a better feel for what's really going on, that way.

It hasn't been easy to describe. What comes to mind so clearly has been difficult to put into words.

And Joe's just riding a wave. Plenty of people get on that wave. Big or small, the feeling is the same. Takes a strong mind to be able to ride it out. He's good at it. Some people are built for that, most crack. What's interesting is there are several people on the planet who can handle it. Getting there though is damn near impossible. Nobody starts out thinking they'll get there either. It just kind of happens and one learns on the fly.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Woops, didn't see this, sorry.

I guess, I can sympathise with your approach. The problem is that I feel that if I stay quiet, I'm being complacent, in a way.

Well that's the thing. Joe has the privilege, the money and the power (not to mention mental fortitude) to ride this wave. Most people don't. Take a random YT podcast that has 10-20 episodes are a few thousand views. Now that podcaster gets branded a conspiracy theorist, misinformant or whatever. He will likely sink from the pressure

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wouldn't say I'm quiet. It's just confusing for people. Not sure if I'm friend or foe. It's not worth the hassle sometimes.

And you can see people crack here on chain. One large 'negative review' and that's all they can think or talk about for weeks. Self destruct mode. Tunnel vision, seeing red; can't get through to them. And then they're done. Poof.

0
0
0.000