There is NO Graphene Oxide in the COVID vaccines. Period.

avatar

vaccines.jpg

I've seen a lot of posts around that are trying to push the narrative that there is Graphene Oxide (GO) in the COVID vaccines. Let me help you out. There is absolutely no Graphene Oxide in the COVID vaccines.

Why are people saying so, if it is not.

It's all coming from one unfortunate and wrongly published paper and propagated by unscrupulous people and organizations looking to capture eyeballs, clicks and views. Follow the money.

The errant report was filed by Pablo Campra Madrid, on June 28th, 2021. He's a professor at the University of Almeria. It is published here. It is being taken as fact even though his own University denounced it as an "unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a total lack of traceability"

🔹Comunicado de la Universidad de Almería en relación con las falsas informaciones difundidas en algunas redes sociales y blogs. pic.twitter.com/Rx6ayF35eI

— Universidad de Almería (@ualmeria) July 2, 2021

Faced with the false information disseminated on some social networks and blogs about a report provisional from a professor at the University of Almeria, who seems to question vaccines faced with Covid-19, the University of Almeria communicates that:

It is flatly false the the University of Almeria has carried out a scientific study with the results that are being published by those media that, on the other hand, are misrepresenting the content of an unofficial report by a University professor about a[sic] analysis of a sample of unknown origin with total lack of traceability. Report that this University neither subscribes nor shares, as the report itself warns.

The University of Almeria, as an academic institution, seamlessly supports vaccines as scientifically unquestionable instrument to fight disease.

The University of Almeria studies and reserves the possibility of directing civil and criminal actions against those who continue to disclose the falsehoods that this communication denies.

The vaccine vials were sent to the author by a "messenger service" and does not disclose the source. He then compared images of the liquid with those of graphene oxide and concluded that they looked similar. This study, if it can be called such is a slap in the face of science. There's so much wrong with it starting with perhaps traceable lots from the manufacturer; a reproducible methodology, validation from multiple samples... ah, never mind smells like poop, feels like poop, must be poop.

So take a look at the narrative of the post that you are reading that spouts the claim that Graphene Oxide is in the vaccine. If they talk about a Spanish study that discovered GO in the Pfizer vaccine you now know where the source came from.

Oh, But Wait. What about that video!

Right, ok. You mean the one that shows that people are magnetic after the vaccine because there is Graphene Oxide in the vaccines? Gotcha. Or was that the one where the microchips were in the vaccines there's a few, doesn't matter both follow the same bull.

While it's true graphene oxide nanoparticles are an amazing discovery they have not made it into the COVID vaccine. There are a lot of posts that will try to tell you otherwise but ask yourself why? What's the motivation behind their posts. Check out their other posts and the themes of their posts are they leaning towards conspiracies? Look for perpendicular sources of information and see if the consensus holds. Does what you are being told actually make sense?

Just think about it

For instance. Graphene Oxide is dark brown to black. Even in a reduced graphene oxide powder, it is still light brown. Claims state that the vaccines are 99% graphene oxide. If you look at the vaccines they are all clear and transparent or clear and slightly yellow. If Graphene Oxide is in the vaccines they would look like this image of graphene oxide in a solution below - not so clear.


graphene.JPG

image source - https://nanografi.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-graphene-oxide-and-reduced-graphene-oxide/

SO, there's no graphene oxide in the vaccines

Right, there is not. What you are being told has been thoroughly debunked. The paper that says it's so is not supportable, the common sense says it's not in there and all you have to fall back on is people trying to convince you that there is a conspiracy to hide the graphene oxide content in the vaccines. Again, commons sense would ask you to ask why? What purpose does it serve to put Graphene Oxide in the vaccines? There is none other than some conspiracy.

Why do so many fall for conspiracies

Watch this rationale to conspiracy theories - defend yourself against being susceptible to these conspiracies and educate yourself. Does what people are telling you make sense and why?

Start asking questions and ask for proof of these claims and not supported by a Youtube video, meme or someone that just says so(regardless of their professional status.) Check the sources and be prepared to read through a lot of nonsense.

What do you think of all the misinformation out there?

  • Dangerous
  • Just noise, ignore it
  • Fight back
  • Lost cause



0
0
0.000
30 comments
avatar
(Edited)

What do you think of all the misinformation out there?

Dangerous

0
0
0.000
avatar

like misinformation from the #1 killers on earth, the US government and their Big Phgarma lobbyist backers who have the whole world addicted to pills and cancer drugs and HIV drugs?

Big pharma wants to fuck you up with a shot that cripples you so you have to keep taking their shots to stay alive and pay for them as the prices go up

fuck you if you deny this, youre a retard if you think big pharma doesnt profit off our medical pain and suffering

0
0
0.000
avatar

Unfortunately, I also think all that misinformation out there is dangerous because so many people fall for it. They keep saying 'Do your own research' but every time you check their research, it's just a rehash of some debunked ridiculous ideas. Many times, a kid with an ounce of common sense could debunk them! Some are too ignorant to know better, but the worst part is that some spread this misinformation knowingly, just to get their minute of fame.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Bingo! I bet you half the big guys pushing the BS don't give a rats ass about the content or the people... the more conspiratorial and the more provocative the better and the more clicks and eye-balls it will get. They are playing into and dialling in the psychology and drive of the conspiracy programming.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely. Just look at this "Disinformation Dozen" and all their lies about the vaccines. Most of them were just some unknown fake doctors. And now, after more than a year spreading all this non-sense, they have big social media followings, they made big profits selling BS books and videos, etc... I struggle to understand how so many people can fall for this though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

disinformation dozen? So you point to some random crap you saw on MSNBC instead of arguing the facts that medicine is corrupt, we have no national healthcare system and yet they act like we do trying to inject us all with some MYSTERY injection with ingrediants and a MRNA gene therapy recipe we arent even allowed to see or know about because its private?

You are now property of big pharma LEGALLY speaking because you have their injection in YOUR body and its now re writing YOUR dna and now YOUR DNA BELONGS TO BIG PHARMA ... just like the corn farmer who fucking got his farm taken away for growing corn that was cross pollenated in from some OTHER farm

yeah thats you now buddy

enjoy the side effects of some mystery injection, because when you all start dying from the shot theyll blame everyone who didnt get the shot who are all still healthy , but it will be from the side effects

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ah ah, that's just great, and illustrating my point so perfectly. Being accused of getting my information from a TV channel by somebody who's clearly only parroting right wing propaganda debunked lies is just priceless. mRNA vaccine technology has been studied and worked on for about twenty years, and we know it cannot alter DNA. It would need to enter the cell nucleus, which it can't. But I know I would probably waste my time trying to have a serious discussion with somebody who apparently learned what mRNA was by seeing a meme on Facebook or Twitter.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Ok so no abortion rights for you and your leftist insane people who follow orders like nazi concentration camps

no personal freedom to not take some fucking big pharma injection with 0 consensus?

You get all your rights taken away then

You want to force us to take a death injection? Ok so its war then. We will start forcing you to get sterilized next and make it THE LAW

If you got "consensus" from everyone to commit suicide, you think thats rational self interest?

When Nazi germany had "consensus " to kill all the jews, was that ok because it was "consensus"?

0
0
0.000
avatar

You think someone out there with access to these vaccines would have already replicated the experiment to see for themselves. Stuff like these immediately get some available samples for testing to see if they're real. Still appreciate the fact that the professor made the conclusion claim of the results being inconclusive.

It's just dumb to think he would stick his neck out for one sample with a questionable source when he can just have more samples by official channels like a real researcher would do.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly. I just don't understand how you get to that level in an educational setting and do something as novice as what he did. I hope that the University further distances itself from him. It was reckless to publish before confirming other samples. He even states that they should get others to test - If you have to state that you shouldn't publish. Irresponsible and reckless. Seems to be an edge scientist from the looks of his other pubs.

0
0
0.000
avatar

flagging all your posts untill you apologize for spreading dangerous conspiracies promtoing dangerous big pharma injections

also the graphene oxide isnt in the injections, its just another pollutant like plastics or oil or everything our industrial society manufactures

scram apologist, you wont find any friends here

flagging all your comments

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, OK. So, no graphene oxide in the vaccines, which you say there is none is spreading dangerous conspiratorial blah, blah, blah? Damn, so confused. Is it or isn't it dangerous conspiracies promoting information?

No friends in the science community... oh, ok. Let me know if you want me to write a personal post for you on what Graphene Oxide is... it's definitely not another pollutant like plastics or oil. It's way cooler.

You should take your cafeteria bully routine somewhere else. Maybe Twitter or Facebook - I hear vitriol does well there.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @verite! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 50 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 100 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

0
0
0.000
avatar
Connect

Trade


@verite! This post has been manually curated by the $PIZZA Token team!

Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza. Enjoy a slice of $PIZZA on us!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why do so many fall for conspiracies

Maybe because of this:

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/self-assembling-morgellons-engsrp-samospajajuci-morgeloni

And maybe because nobody is responsible for any garbage found in so called ‘vaccines’:

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/contaminant-moderna-vaccines-suspected-be-metallic-powder-nhk-2021-08-27/

And maybe because the most of the ‘conspiracy theories’ actually were true:

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/pfizer-leak-contract-with-the-devil-engsrp-procurelo-iz-fajzera-ugovor-sa-djavolom

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/youll-own-nothing-and-youll-be-happy-engsrp-necete-imati-nishta-i-bicete-srecni

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/nazis-behind-the-vax-pass-engsrp-nacisti-iza-vakcinalnog-pasosha

And maybe because your ‘fact-checkers’ are a lying bastards paid by Big Pharma and Big Finance to hide the facts ie. censor anything bad for their profits:

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/a-patented-hoax-and-fake-checkers-engsrp-patentirana-prevara-i-lazhni-kontrolori

And maybe because ‘vaccines’ are not needed at all:

If only it weren't for those unpleasant facts, nobody would fall for that…

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are proving my point. Congrats!

BTW, Ivermectin is for use by veterinarians as an anti-parasitic in horses, cows and other livestock. Low dose Ivermectin tablets are approved for use in people for the treatment of some parasitic worms (intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis) and ivermectin topical formulations are approved for humans for head lice... IT'S an ANTI-PARASITIC.

The video is talking about a very, very limited study! Yet people are going to feed stores and buying this. It's dangerous and irresponsible to promote its use before wider studies are done.

Here's a link to the actual study background.

not a link to a posts I wrote amplifying conspiracies.

If you read the study background there are some inconsistencies that point to the validity of the study as well. The study trial has "very low" certainty evidence. So, the findings have considerable uncertainty. I was unable to find published results and data in a journal anywhere - why?. Maybe there is some validity but this study is nowhere near rigorous enough to support widely adopted usage.

There's also this study

Should more studies be done, perhaps

Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.
From https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/

However, the results are in cultures. That means a petri dish and the dosage needed would probably kill you.

And finally a well-written report on the evidence on the treatment of COVID-19 using Ivermectin.
https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-sag-ivermectin-in-treatment-and-prevention-rapid-review.pdf

So, props for writing about all the conspiracies it absolutely takes a lot of time and is entertaining as hell. But that's all it really is... entertaining (you should look into Alex Jones' money and all the money the big three are making off of conspiracy sheeple ... I mean theorists.)

0
0
0.000
avatar

BTW, Ivermectin is for use by veterinarians as an anti-parasitic in horses, cows and other livestock.

The fact that you still didn’t hear that there is a human version of Ivermectin speaks about your deep knowledge on the topic…

not a link to a posts I wrote amplifying conspiracies.

I am sending link to my post because in it there are more links which proves what I am talking about. But you go ahead and read only what you THINK it’s true, let’s see where that will lead you.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I literally wrote - "tablets are approved for use in people" - you know, people ergo human.

Low dose Ivermectin tablets are approved for use in people for the treatment of some parasitic worms (intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis) and ivermectin topical formulations are approved for humans for head lice.

Well, what I read tends to be more rooted in reality and not looking for imagined conspiracies. I scanned through your posts to understand enough. Most conspiracies I could care less about, believe in what you want, find what you want. The ones that can cause harm, such as the Ivermectin as a treatment, COVID is a hoax, or the vaccine contains GO and the multitude of variants on those themes... propagation of those imagined conspiracies, misinformation can harm people, is harming people in so far as actually killing people. That's where I take issue and push back. There is no shortage of conspiracists and misinformation around COVID and Vaccines.

That's not to say you shouldn't have a healthy skepticism. And that's not to say that there are not real conspiracies. I acknowledge that there have been real conspiracies. However, carefully analysing the data without falling into the traits of conspiratorial thinking is important. Critical thinking is a part of avoiding that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, really? Ivermectin is killing? How many?

Here is a growing number Big Pharma ‘vaccines’ are killing:

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@lighteye/ivermectin-vs-vaccines-propaganda-and-truth-engsrp-ivermektin-protiv-vakcina-propaganda-i-istina

Let me help you, since you probably would care less for the ‘conspiracy theories’ from CDC (VAERS base) and EU base EUDRA. Since July they are recording more deaths after vaccination than from the alleged disease itself.

And here is a Lawsuit with an insider witness ready to state under oath that the official number of ‘vaccine’ deaths in the VAERS base should be multiplied by a factor of at least 5:

https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit

0
0
0.000
avatar

FFS, you realize that the VAERS database allows the general public to report what they feel are the adverse effects of a vaccine. Each report has to be validated and confirmed. It's not relevant until it's confirmed - they are unverified reports. It's not an accurate representation of anything - lower or higher incidents.

It even calls that outright on the bloody top of the page:

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. Reports are accepted from anyone and can be submitted electronically at www.vaers.hhs.gov.

The FDA does require healthcare providers to report any death after vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. They still have to be investigated. So Far the only causal relationship between the vaccine and deaths is blood clots with low platelets from the J&J vaccine.

Anti-vaxxers have been shilling VAERS argument since the MMR bullshit., long before COVID.

A lawsuit from the American Frontline Doctors - Oh, OK, signed by Jane Doe? Come on, again VAERS is an unconfirmed database. Have you actually looked at the data? Of the 5335 records that I found for 2021 - over 3,000 have comorbidities - unfortunately likely to have passed even if they did not get the vaccine. You can't sue the government on a database that is gathering unverified data and say it's inaccurate.

I think you are referring to these clowns?

COVID deniers drop lawsuit against health department; their $130k legal fund remains
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2021/03/17/covid-deniers-drop-lawsuit-against-health-department-their-130k-legal-fund-remains/

Only one winning here is COVID and the lawyers. One lawsuit was thrown out... we'll see what happens to the rest.

Just to be clear - Correlation does not equal causation!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of the 5335 records that I found for 2021 - over 3,000 have comorbidities

So, you were searching comorbidities for the reported cases of death after vaccination. And have you tried to find covid comorbidities records?

general public to report what they feel are the adverse effects of a vaccine.

Deaths are not ‘feeling effects’. You can believe whatever you want, but you cant deny reported cases after covid vaccination are larger than reported cases in the last 30 years from all the vaccines COMBINED:

VAERS data-2021-07-27_145459.jpg
Source / Извор: openvaers.com

You don’t have to respond to me, try to respond to your own conscience.

Good luck.

0
0
0.000
avatar

untitled.gif

0
0
0.000
avatar

your meme is just reddit hivemind leftist garbage. You Canadians are just like the French or Australians except you drive the global fucking narrative on sucking the dicks of big pharma and following orders like Nazi concentration camp guards

show me 1 single piece of verifiable blockchain anchored medical evidence about the virus or the fucking jab

even @dan larimer said on Voice he doubts the virus story and explains how it may just be a toxin and thatno lab has ever fucking isolated it..... show me 1 single REAL electron microscope image of this shit bro

you cant

now remember @dan said this shit and he created steem and the system that hive uses, youre literally on it

so go somewhere else if youre that stupid. theres plenty of PRO big pharma covax sites for you to talk on , go there

i hope you die from the shot from side effects i really do. I understand why Trump had to kill you peopel off, you would have killed us down the line, youre like people who give out poison koolaid on a boat, you have to be thrown overboard liek cancer

0
0
0.000
avatar

Wow. Don't even know me and out with the first death wish. Now, who's the one promoting genocide and censorship. Love how you denigrate to just straight name-calling and ill wishes. Keep it up, chump. You are exactly what you don't want to be.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Each report has to be validated and confirmed.

confirmed by what? There is no medical blockchain. Science and medicine are 100% corrupted by centralized buracracy EXACTLY THE SAME AS STEEMIT was corrupted. ITS THE SAME CENTRALIZED SHIT

WAKE UP

Flagged for spreading disinfo about the vaccine and lacking any sense of consensus of decentralized medicine

0
0
0.000
avatar

Wow, so obtuse. People need to call and follow up on any of the claims to ensure the validity of the submission. I'm sure it's an easy concept to understand and does not involve a blockchain. Definitely trolling there, or a little slow on the concept.

0
0
0.000
avatar

all lies, no blockchain proof for any of your centralized medical data which is all un provable

sorry but untill you have every LAB on a medical blockchain of chains, all your points are just nonesense .... like quoting from the Nazi Reich governments stats on Jews

You may as well tell us stats from soviet union bro

flagged for spreading propaganda

0
0
0.000
avatar

But... by your own logic...I don't see any of the Ivermectin research on a blockchain I don't see any of the VAERS data showing all the adverse reactions, on the blockchain. I don't see any hydroxychloroquine research, on the blockchain... can you explain how one needs to have things on the blockchain to be valid yet others don't... there's no blockchain proof of any of those treatments or research.

0
0
0.000