RE: The new STEMsocial engagement/reputation system

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Err umm...thank you for your post!

The beginning is usually the most difficult part of the process. Yet, a consistent and reliable standard of analysis is required for any process. It’s good for users to recognize how the system begins to review their work. While written by humans, the program performs its actions only as directed and to the extent reported by your article.

It’s a great step. Thank you for creating it.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

Thanks for your comment! We are still unsure about what to do with those numbers. So if you have ideas/suggestions, feel free top share them!

Note also that this does not enter in the post reviewing by our curators.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think it's a good enough start. I gather that the goal is to measure and judge with as little human opinion as possible. I do similar evaluations at work. Though I feel it is impossible to rule out errors completely.

0
0
0.000