Knowing how to Manipulate fertilizers for high production
from PxHere
The use of large quantities of fertiliser to achieves high harvests, as well as the potential adverse effects on the environment that this practise has been shown to have, has brought this practise under scrutiny.
But with a growing global population, we need to use new technology and intensify production and management to produce more food from the same amount of cropland. The use of fertiliser is crucial to achieving this goal.
Agricultural fertilisers have been misused, and the effects on the environment must be mitigated. However, before applying fertiliser, it's vital to weigh the potential hazards against the rewards for crop growth.
The time has come to send the right message to a world that is becoming more and more urbanised and distant from what agricultural production is all about: providing healthy food by debunking myths and misconceptions about fertilisers and nutrients.
According to a study of agricultural output in the United States, without nitrogen (N) fertiliser, average maize yields would drop by 40 percent. If phosphate (P) and potassium (K) were also scarce, population losses would be much more dramatic. Research over extended periods of time has repeatedly shown that fertiliser is an important factor in maintaining crop yields. Longitudinal research in Oklahoma, for instance, reveals a 40 percent drop in wheat yield without consistent N and P applications. Fertilizer and lime additions accounted for 57% of the grain yield in a long-term study conducted in Missouri.
Corn yields in the Corn Belt of the United States have been steadily rising for decades without a corresponding rise in N fertiliser use (the nutrient addition most associated with runoff-related water impairment). In fact, in the last quarter of a century, we've seen a 35% increase in how effectively we use nitrogen (meaning less N fertiliser is now required to produce a bushel of grain). The remarkable increase in maize harvests has occurred without any increase in N fertiliser use. Modern genetics and enhanced agronomic practises have also contributed to this progress.
It has been shown that animal dung is a valuable source of nutrients for agricultural soils. However, many individuals falsely believe that manure possesses some sort of unique capacity for constructing soils. There are no nutrients in manures beyond what is already contained in the animal feed used to create the manure. Like animal feed, manures don't add any new organic matter to the environment. There is no net gain in nutrients or organic materials as a result of the digestive process.
As a result, any nutrients or organic matter found in manure spread on fields comes from the digestion of crops grown elsewhere. Harvested hay, grain, or silage are used to feed animals, and then, after being digested, are spread on another field, where the nutrients and carbon (C) lost during animal growth are replaced.
Animal manures rarely have the ideal ratio of plant nutrients needed for cultivation. Nutrient imbalances and soil buildup are common outcomes of some manure applications, which can have negative ecological effects. However, the mineralization of composts and manures is dependent on a wide variety of soil and environmental factors, and because of this, it is often less efficient than fertiliser.
Application of farmyard manure increased soil C and N more than did application of fertiliser N in an ongoing study in England that began in 1840. However, treatments that received N fertiliser saw the greatest improvements in soil physical properties like aggregate stability and water infiltration. N leaching after applying the recommended amount of manure (75 tonnes per acre per year) was nearly twice as high as after receiving a fertiliser N treatment (250 N pounds per acre per year).
Animals will increase the demand for fertiliser and manure management as they consume more grass and crops that will be grown in the future. However, these animals cannot supply the fresh nutrients that are essential for survival. With increasing urbanisation comes a corresponding increase in the amount of waste generated from food sources and other biological sources (biosolids). However, there is growing public opposition to putting these materials back on the land, and their land application is prohibited in many nations.
It is critical to crop nutrition to keep the world's food supply stable. For optimal results, use fertiliser as directed, and don't be shy about advocating for farming methods that help the greater good.
REferences
Why is fertilizer important for feeding the world? | Yara International. (2018, January 10). Yara None; www.yara.com. https://www.yara.com/crop-nutrition/why-fertilizer/feeding-the-world/
Role of Fertilirs in Agriculture | JLI Blog. (2019, September 12). JLI Blog | Global Training & Education Provider; www.jliedu.com. https://www.jliedu.com/blog/fertilizers-role-agriculture/
Understanding Fertilizer and Its Essential Role in High-Yielding Crops | Mosaic Crop Nutrition. (n.d.). Mosaic Crop Nutrition; www.cropnutrition.com. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.cropnutrition.com/resource-library/understanding-fertilizer-and-its-essential-role-in-high-yielding-crops
Interesting article. Thanks!
Thank you so much, friend. I'm glad you liked it
Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!
Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).
You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support.
I am not sure that the usage of fertiliser without paying too much attention is for the greater good, and I tend to disagree with you.
As pointed out in your blog, an abusive usage of fertilisers could have dramatic consequences on other species and the environment (for instance indirectly, when fertilisers go back to the water system). In my opinion, the main problem is that we are all about production, production and again production. That's not very right... and we should reconsider (and also consider other alternatives).
Cheers, and thanks again for this interesting blog!
Well, you have a point here, because applying fertilizers can cause harm(due to phosphorus and nitrogen it contains )to the lives of some organisms living in the water when washed down to waterways although this occurs mostly when Farmers abuse the utilization.
Thank you so much for this point , I will put that into consideration next time...
My pleasure. It is always nice to discuss :)
Cheers!