You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Existence Of God And What Science Says

in StemSocial9 months ago

Dear @clinton19, I am a Christian and believe in the existence of God!
It is often ridiculed of the barbarity and folly of the religious wars between Christianity and Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism in the Middle Ages.

However, with the advent of scientific evolution theory in the 19th century after the Middle Ages, mankind caused World Wars I and II.
Europeans had created a Holocaust that should never have been caused for the purpose of scientific evolution of mankind.

Hitler's idea that the inferior races should be exterminated for the sake of human evolution carried out such a demonic act.

Dostoevsky put it this way:
If there was no God, humans would engage in certain demonic actions.

From my point of view, I believe Dostoevsky prophesied the twentieth century demonic wars that would unfold as atheistic scientism took over Europe!

Watching the Holocaust in Europe, I believe that science is a tool, not a religion!

The fact that Europeans who claimed to be the most evolved in the world engaged in blind scientism and waged evil wars led me to discover the existence of God!

Sort:  

Dear @clinton19, I am a Christian and believe in the existence of God!

Well, if you believe in the existence of God, that's good for you but there are others that don't believe. How do you make those that don't believe, believe.
The fact is that there's no direct evidence of the existence of God. If God exists, I believe it is aware of everything going on, why then allow this whole confusion ? It/he/she should at least reveal itself so that everyone can agree on it's existence and doubts would be eliminated. Unless that, the concept of God would continue to be controversial topic.

It is often ridiculed of the barbarity and folly of the religious wars between Christianity and Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism in the Middle Ages.

However, with the advent of scientific evolution theory in the 19th century after the Middle Ages, mankind caused World Wars I and II.
Europeans had created a Holocaust that should never have been caused for the purpose of scientific evolution of mankind.

Hitler's idea that the inferior races should be exterminated for the sake of human evolution carried out such a demonic act.

Dostoevsky put it this way:
If there was no God, humans would engage in certain demonic actions.

From my point of view, I believe Dostoevsky prophesied the twentieth century demonic wars that would unfold as atheistic scientism took over Europe!

Watching the Holocaust in Europe, I believe that science is a tool, not a religion!

The fact that Europeans who claimed to be the most evolved in the world engaged in blind scientism and waged evil wars led me to discover the existence of God!

I don't quite get your argument here.

Dear @clinton19, I hope you understand first that I am a non-English speaker. My English level is an American elementary school student.😅

Well, if you believe in the existence of God, that's good for you but there are others that don't believe. How do you make those that don't believe, believe.
The fact is that there's no direct evidence of the existence of God. If God exists, I believe it is aware of everything going on, why then allow this whole confusion ? It/he/she should at least reveal itself so that everyone can agree on it's existence and doubts would be eliminated. Unless that, the concept of God would continue to be controversial topic.

I think that the singularity of the existence of the earth and humans proves the existence of God.
Do you think that a scientific explanation is possible for the reason that the ocean exists only on Earth in the infinite universe and why so many living things were born?

The Bible says that God created the universe for humans.
The fact that Earth is the birthplace of the only living beings in the infinite universe proves the existence of God.
Can you scientifically explain why life didn't exist on other planets in the universe?

The facts you present here are not direct evidence of the existence of God. Did it/he/she tell you directly that it is responsible for the facts you present, it's like having a scenario where some persons died in a cave by fire and because you strongly believe in dragons and that dragons as you were told/where ever you got the information from, lives in caves and breaths out fire, then you conclude that a dragon killed those people. Well, no one was there including you, anything could have caused those people to have died by fire. The facts you present could have other explanations, you were not there when it all began and if I'm correct you most likely heard about the concept "God" from people around you, whether while you were growing up or maybe later but from people around you, even your holy book came from somebody - not given to you directly from God.
Have you heard of the anthropic principle ? It's one of the many explanations of why the universe is the way it is, just like God is your on explanation.

And point of correction, science neither supports nor opposes the existence of God, most of the arguments presented in the article are logical arguments not scientific arguments, be it in support or in opposition to the existence of God.
Also it's not yet certain if it's only our planet that was designed to support life, the entire universe has not been explored. I think i might have seen discoveries of certain planets that were likely designed to support life also/even slightly similar to earth even though life forms are yet to be discovered in those planet - it seems to me like an unfinished design of the universe.

The Bible says that God created the universe for humans.
The fact that Earth is the birthplace of the only living beings in the infinite universe proves the existence of God.

The Bible never talked about the existence of other planets, even if it did, it should have explained why only one planet possessed life. Why would your God keep such informations away ?

The facts you present here are not direct evidence of the existence of God. Did it/he/she tell you directly that it is responsible for the facts you present, it's like having a scenario where some persons died in a cave by fire and because you strongly believe in dragons and that dragons as you were told/where ever you got the information from, lives in caves and breaths out fire, then you conclude that a dragon killed those people. Well, no one was there including you, anything could have caused those people to have died by fire. The facts you present could have other explanations, you were not there when it all began and if I'm correct you most likely heard about the concept "God" from people around you, whether while you were growing up or maybe later but from people around you, even your holy book came from somebody - not given to you directly from God.
Have you heard of the anthropic principle ? It's one of the many explanations of why the universe is the way it is, just like God is your on explanation.

Dear @clinton19, Because I am a non-English speaker, it is difficult to fully understand your English. I will reply after translating your sentences.

Do you know the historical fact that Western science was based on medieval European scholasticism?