What Could Exist Beyond Our Universe ? - The Universe Might Be Giving Us Clues

in StemSociallast year


Since the dawn of man's existence here on Earth, questions have been raised about what happens when certain limits are exceeded and questions of these kinds which originates from man's inherent inquisitiveness has propelled him to revolutionary changes of breaking boundaries, in fact these questions are part of the driving forces responsible for technological advancements. Through technological advancements we now know what lies beyond our local residences, countries, planet, solar system and galaxy but there appears to be a question lurking on some of us minds, which as at now is still inconclusively answerable and is because we currently lack the technologies to be able to answer such question. What then is this question ?

Refer back to the title of this article.

Answering such a question could lead to fascinating discoveries and would require technologies far more sophisticated and advanced than what is currently available. As at this moment what we have are theories of what might exist beyond our Universe and they (the theories) were postulated based on some observational discoveries made by astronomers. Before we embark on our theoretical journey, we need to clarify the universe we are actually talking about.

The Big Bang model of the universe's origin makes us to know that at the beginning existed a point with infinite density and temperature, and that this point expanded, the expansion marked the beginning of physical existence (universe). However, we might be forced to think from a lay person's perspective that there was something originally present of which the point with infinite density and temperature existed (like a point on a paper) and that the universe overshadowed this mysterious stuff, so therefore the mysterious stuff must be beyond our physical universe. Well looking at it from this perspective implies a finite universe, we might not be certain if the universe is finite or not but from a purely physical perspective this picture is wrong, saying something physical exist before existence itself (since the birth of the universe marks the beginning of physical existence) sounds contradictory. The point need not be anywhere, we can illustrate how the big bang events might possibly have been using a simple picture and it goes like this.

Imagine yourself in an extremely dark room with both your eyes closed without your imaginations and thoughts, but you know that there are infinitely many thoughts and imaginations in your mind. Now imagine generating a particular imagination/thought, say the universe and it's properties. The initial state of your mind with potentially infinite thoughts can be considered the non-existence/singularity - point with infinite density and temperature, notice that the point is not anywhere, it's both everywhere and nowhere. Now when the imagination/thought you made comes into be (within your mind), it replaces the singularity, assuming the concept "time" exists, also being continuous and flows in one direction, then the replacement is not sudden, the gradual replacement can be considered the expansion of the point universe. Personally I believe we exist in a super mind (cosmic mind), some might choose to call it the God mind. We should also notice from our simple illustration that the mind is boundless, which means our universe that came into be might be boundless/infinite.

What we have just described above is the existence of the overall universe, but there's something called the observable universe and it principally has to do with the vacuum speed of light. Physical observation suggests that the universe is expanding and mathematically the rate of expansion (expansion speed) is directly proportional to the distance, sometimes called the Hubble law - if distance increases, expansion speed increases, this implies that there's possibility of faster than light expansion. We generally detect cosmic objects (objects outer space) through radiations, most especially electromagnetic radiations, either by emission/reflection from the cosmic object and these radiations move at the vacuum speed of light. The expansion of space/ universe affects how we detect the emitted/reflected radiations - through redshift, if we are at a distance where the expansion speed is lesser than the speed of light, then we observe the radiation from the emitting/reflecting source with a longer wavelength (redshifted) implying that the photons would take a longer time than expected to reach us. If we are at a distance where the expansion speed is equal to the speed of light, then the photons reach us at a very long time than expected, like almost forever(more redshifted than when expansion speed is lesser than the speed of light). However if we are at a distance where the expansion speed is greater than the speed of light, we never get to observe/detect the emitting/reflecting source - the radiation would never reach us


What this means is that at distances corresponding to expansion speeds from zero to the vacuum speed of light, we can detect objects in the universe while at distances corresponding to speeds greater than the vacuum speed of light, we cannot detect objects in the universe. This is where observable universe comes in, our observable universe from a spherical/circular perspective has been shown numerically to be about 93 billion light years wide (diameter), indirectly the observable universe is finite and is called the Hubble volume - in theory. What this also means is that the oldest photons (since the big bang) in our observable universe has traveled a distance of about 45 - 47 billion light years. When you compare these observations in our observable universe arbitrarily with that of a black hole assuming the Hubble parameter is constant, you would be forced to believe we might exist in a black hole, in fact this is what some scientists think, for our observable universe the event horizon has a distance from the center to be about 45 - 47 billion light years (distance travelled by our oldest photons).

images (4).jpeg

Previously we said there are theories that tell what might possibly exist beyond the universe, the universe we are talking about is actually our observable universe. Let's now embark on our theoretical voyage.


Dark flow theory

In 2008 a team of researchers discovered something shocking from physical observation and what did they find ?
They found that in addition to the expansion of the universe which is often attributed to dark energy, clusters of galaxies were also exhibiting another kind of motion, they seemed to be flowing uniformly in a particular direction with speeds greater than the expansion rate of the universe. The conclusion, which can be considered a theory was that the contents in our observable universe (including dark energy) could not be responsible for this motion but was as a result of some unknown megastructure(s)/ matter existing outside our observable universe, thus earning the flow, the name "dark flow".

Multiverse theory

Most other theories of what lies beyond our observable universe falls under this category, in fact some scientists claim that the dark flow is a sign of the existence of a multiverse. There are different versions of the multiverse hypothesis but what's common about them is that they predict the existence of other observable universes in addition to ours,


other observable universes are infinite in number and contain all kinds of possibilities you can ever think of and all contained in the overall boundless universe, which can sometimes be called the multiverse. However there's a multiverse version that is more cosmologically inclined and it is contained in the cosmic inflation theory.

Well, I think this is all we can take for now and like I said before the actual answer is still inconclusive, what we have just discussed are nothing but mere speculations. If we really want to know the answer we need to advance our technologies either by discovering/producing a faster than light means of transportation, as it would help us reach anywhere including the edge of the universe - if it actually exists, within a very short time or by producing a super telescope, one that we can use to see anything in or beyond the universe irrespective of our location in spacetime.
Or maybe we should just mind our businesses probably because outside the universe might be a very dangerous place, but it seems the only way to know is to not mind our businesses - find out.

For further reading

What Lies Beyond the Edge of the Observable Universe?

Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space

Thank you all once again for stopping by to read my jargons and also thank you @juecoree, @discovery-it and the @OCD team for your valuable supports.

images (3)~2.jpeg

Lastly, please don't forget to do the needful
If you enjoyed my jargons.



Imagine travelling beyond the speed of light, it would be amazing. You'd get to your destination turn around and you would then see yourself travelling there.

Would that be classified as time travelling?

Smart thinking, you just raised a paradox of moving faster than the vacuum speed of light that implies time traveling. Yes it can be classified as time traveling. I shall further look into this.
Thanks for your comment.

Your content has been voted as a part of Encouragement program. Keep up the good work!

Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!

Support Ecency
Vote for Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more

Congratulations @clinton19! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 1250 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 1500 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider supporting our funding proposal, approving our witness (@stem.witness) or delegating to the @stemsocial account (for some ROI).

Please consider using the STEMsocial app app and including @stemsocial as a beneficiary to get a stronger support.