Dr. Marty Makary Explains The Flawed Arguments for Masks and Vaxx for Kids

Thank you for publishing this interview. I found it very interesting. Here are my thoughts:

What he is saying is that if there had not been such pressure on the population from the political side, more people would have had confidence in local medicine or their doctors. But he did not pursue the question of why the political pressure is so great.

Yet this would be an important question, which apparently does not need to be further elucidated for him. Indeed, I also would estimate that if it were not for such an immense political campaign, the population would be less sceptical and one would have continued with business as usual, realising vaccination practices similar to those that took place before 2020.

It's a pity that you didn't explore this question further in this interview, but I understand that this should not be the direction.

The average death rate circulating on the basis of the data has also not been particularly touched upon, where in "normal times" the immense measures would not have been justified, assuming a value of less than one percentage point. So I don't quite understand why the interviewee says that the benefits far outweigh the harm. Does he have other figures? He also reduces the question to the biological state of health alone, but does not include other factors. One might find this forgivable for a doctor, but due to the high political appropriation of the issue, it would be desirable for him to look beyond his horizon (maybe he does so in his private chamber).

That he claims that he is convinced of vaccinations, masks, etc., but at the same time criticises the fact that not all people react equally positively to them, is for me initially a positive sign with regard to those who oppose the measures.

However, I do not agree with the assumption that if the measures were less drastic and the demands for mass vaccinations less rigid, this would mean that people would deal with the matter more sensibly (in his eyes). What individuals consider reasonable and acceptable is not solely a biological question. It is also a philosophical and social question. The fact that the health of the individual is made the business of a collective and the resistance to such an existence is, in my view, a very big problem and which doctors are prepared to play this explosive issue from front to back because their work and income, as well as their reputation, are involved?

Insofar as a door is opened here, i.e. the individual is subordinate to the collective, this has subsequent consequences not only in the Covid matter, but it also opens doors for scenarios not yet considered. Keyword prevention. The behaviour and personal decisions for people regarding their lifestyle may be irrational, harmful and otherwise unreasonable for people looking purely at health, but that is not the business of the many (or the insurance companies and government authorities) to want to determine reason or unreasonableness.

Overall, the death figures do not require the state of emergency, not when after when the whole thing began, the drastic dangerousness could neither be seen and felt by the masses. If something so dangerously would go around, prevention would be a joke, is what I think. "Bio-hazard" would look much different to what we have experienced, no? At least, when you think about a "plague". From which I slowly but surely started to doubt it ever happened in the intensity it was reported from the past.

All in all, we are not talking about a significantly influential event, but about one that fits in with other events and is not significantly worse than the other problems of health or other nature that people experience in their usual existence. What makes it such a special event is the constant coverage and the never-ending headlines and sensational news in the media. I personally therefore consider it more of a media event than something that upsets the usual reality. Just imagine if it had hardly become a media event, if at all, how much of it would we actually have noticed or taken seriously? I think that's a very interesting question.

I don't know how much sense it makes to interview someone from the Johns Hopkins School , when the John Hopkins University helped to prepare the plandemic in Event 201..! To let them "play/expose themselves"??

Congratulations @dbroze! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You distributed more than 41000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 42000 upvotes.

_{You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}