RE: Elixir Comprehensions - The "for" macro
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Hello again. Thanks for sharing this in the Programming community. While I won't be trying it at the moment, I'd love to see what you come up with!
0
0
0.000
It is plagiarism. Please check the Hivewatchers source in te comment below (this post was edited later).
Hi there,
I did look at the post history and I understand where you are coming from. The text portion of the post is quite similar to that of the documentation (and could've been lifted - which I wouldn't approve) but I like to err on the safe side and I've written reports about computing concepts (for college) with over 25% "plagerised" text because some concepts can't be explained in a different way. I would like to see this content improve. I weighted it myself off of the fact that he had understood it (so it seems, I can't write elixr) and provided unique examples (yes the first example is the same as the documentation I am aware).
I hope we can come to a reasonable understanding together, if you think I'm talking out of my ass and it is plagerised, that's a fair opinion to have. I'm just talking from my perspective.
Many thanks,
~ CA
Hi,
As you see in post history, this user edited parts after being caught.
"if you think I'm talking out of my ass and it is plagerised"
Not at all :-)
When I looked at plagiarism in this post, I also took into account copypasta/plagiarism found in 2 other posts published by this user. This suggested that it was not a one-off mistake.
Hello again,
I have now taken some time to look at previous posts, and I must admit your argument is pretty convincing. I even found this post about the enum module that seems to co-incide a lot with Nolyoi's Post. The uniswap post isn't even code related and looks like a pretty like-for like copy with some words removed.
I am going to see about getting the OCD vote removed and then I will hide this post within the community.
Many thanks for the help,
~ CA