RE: Curation: Now and to come

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

75/25 rewards should come back. Why does someone who powers up their stake and upvote someone get the same amount of reward as someone who writes the post they upvote? Misaligned incentives.

50/50 encourages people to buy stake, never post or comment, join any curation trail, sit back and relax while your account uses a bot to upvote things and you make money from doing nothing.

50/50 is not an incentive for Proof Of Brain.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

75/25 rewards should come back. Why does someone who powers up their stake and upvote someone get the same amount of reward as someone who writes the post they upvote?

Because there is a very direct cost to buying stake and powering up, as well as risks and the responsibilities of the chain.

50/50 is not an incentive for Proof Of Brain.

Depends what you consider proof of brain.

0
0
0.000
avatar

To me, PoB would be people that are not bots who are posting/commenting legitimately(not spamming/not begging for upvotes/not stealing content/etc).

50/50 has longterm problems with whales not distributing their power overtime and instead keeping themselves whales.

75/25
A whale with 1 million HP, lets say his weekly outgoing upvotes add up to 2,000 USD total, 1,500 for who he upvotes and 500 for himself.

50/50
Same sitiuation, but now he gets 1,000 USD a week to himself and 1,000 to authors.

Under 50/50 his whale position remains relatively static in terms of his overall ownership of the % of HP on the network in total. Under 75/25 everyday that whale loses his % of total HP owned.

I see that as a big issue, entrenched stakeholders who stay that way. Power corrupts absolutely, I believe I heard that somewhere ;)

0
0
0.000