What Impact Will Technology Have On The Economy?

Technology is a tough animal to wrap our minds around. What impact will it have on the economy.

On one hand, we can see it making companies more productive. This is going to natural lead to greater output. However, technology, by its nature, is deflationary. Thus we see many industries having the cost of the product pushed to zero or near-zero. Long distance communications is a prime example of this.

So which is it?

In this article we will try to get to the bottom of this.

image.png
Source

Technology = Human Advancement

This is not too great a statement. All of our advancement over the centuries was due to technology. From the invention of tools during the Stone Age to the super computer, we can see how society benefitted. While there are some mishaps along the way, this is the overall trend.

Therefore, we have no reason to expect that our further progress will not result in advancement for humanity. Of course, we need to keep in mind that not all benefit equally. Technology is an extremely disruptive force which means that we are likely to see "losers" in the equation.

We only need to look at the US manufacturing sector to realize how this works. Output has exploded in the last 30 years. However, we are doing that while being down about 1.5 million manufacturing jobs. In other words, we are able to do more with less.

Now we have a focus on the "Tesla Bot" which is going to be developed with the idea of replacing even more labor. How all of this will unfold is going to be something to watch.

Historically, technological advancement freed people up from the dreary jobs that were hard to do while also yielding little to them from a personal financial perspective. Therefore, in the long run, it was probably a good thing. Of course, it was painful in the moment, especially for those affected.

One problem with technology is that we know it destroys jobs. This is something that everyone will acknowledge. The key, in the past, was that it also enabled us to create more jobs. Sadly, that is not the case in the last 20 years. Our economy keeps growing yet the Workforce Participation Rate keeps dropping. This is a long-term trend few can argue with if they look.

This means the impact upon personal incomes is taking its tool. How can we get around this?

image.png
Source

Will The Economy Grow?

You would think that technology would equate to economic explosion. While that might have been the case in the past, the impact of late is not noticeable. We see growth rates in decline for a variety of reasons, meaning the financial impact at a societal level is just not there. Without growth, the expansion is mostly fueled by debt. This is a recipe for disaster.

That said, how is the economy doing? From the main metric standpoint, GDP, not very well. Japan, EU, and US all have slowing growth rates, something in place for the last couple decades. It does not look like this will change anytime soon.

What if, however, it was actually technology that was causing it? Could it be that our metrics are out of date?

GDP measures the total output of a geographic region. This becomes known as "the economy". What happens if something advances society yet is actually a drain on GDP?

In the past, each time a long-distance phone call was made, that added to GDP. It is not hard to figure out that companies like AT&T saw their LD billing collapse. Yet it is safe to say that communication is busier than ever. The difference is it is basically free.

The same happened with video rental. People purchased machines to view videos on in addition to renting them. This required stores to sell the hardware and rent the cassettes/DVDs. All this went away with the introduction of streaming. No longer are these expenditures made.

What happens when transportation is upended? Or construction? Or the medical field?

All of these are facing advancements due to technology that could have a positive impact for society. However, from a GDP perspective, this could be a step backwards. This is the dilemma that we face.

Perhaps the bottom line is GDP simply is an outdated metric. We are not going to develop new metrics overnight. However, it is evident that we need to create them.

The bottom line is technology will expand the economy even if our present metrics do not reflect it. Think about all that we once paid for yet are free (or near free) today.

That is why human keeps progressing forward.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
22 comments
avatar

I agree that the concept of GDP is outdated. The metric was created to reflect the societal and other changes that generate economic activity in the archaic form of life we lived in the early 20th century. As you said in the post, the indicators and variables that truly reflect the value technology puts into the economy in its own way would be able to properly assess the impact.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is a tough concept. How do you replicate what GDP stood for when so much of our economy is switching to the digital realm?

Most likely, the quantification process will mean less. Perhaps as we evolve into the network-state world, the metrics will come from the onchain activity/value.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 92 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
1

0
0
0.000
avatar

If technology advances to the point where automation meets inexpensive renewable resources for electricity production it could tremendously append the economic structure.

Basically we could see fast manufacturing and cheap operating costs coming together in such a way that it could lower the prices of a lot of goods.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is true.

What if we get two of the biggest factors in production for near zero: energy and labor. If the Tesla Bot comes to fruition, we could see near limitless labor. That would send things skyrocketing.

Of course in the virtual realm, we are looking at a near infinite realm already.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly!

Also, I totally agree with that assessment of the virtual realm!

0
0
0.000
avatar

The most powerful realization. Thinking about the things we used to pay for that are now free. Because of tech these things become better automated, cheaper and easier to have access to. I'm always curious to think about what things will look 50 -100 years from now and all the "free" things they will have because of the automation and fast transactions we are creating here today.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The most powerful realization. Thinking about the things we used to pay for that are now free.

It is something people overlook. Just take the idea of pictures. There is a reason why we take more then 3 trillion a year: it is virtually free. If we were still paying 10-25 cents per picture, there would be a fraction of them taken.

Even the idea of free stock trades is something new. 40 years ago, it was near $100 per trade. Technology changed that field completely.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Technology has create a lot of opportunities for many people around the world and the impact it has as well, I doubt if cryptocurrency would be known without technology

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Technology is definitely going to destroy jobs and the current metrics won't really fit. Do you think Modern Monetary Theory will still stick around? After all, they think debt is fine because the system grows fast enough to offset but we might start running into a period where the system might not grow fast enough.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

MMT already failed.

The system hasnt been growing fast enough in 20 years. In spite of our technological progress, we see a slowing in the growth rate. This shows how debt can weigh on things.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

good final conclusion the world is advancing and perhaps the measurement of PIB has lagged a bit behind since I imagine there are economic variants which it does not take into account and for which technology helps a lot. In the end, if it reaches us, it is to use it

0
0
0.000
avatar

Technology will destroy many jobs and the transition period will be rough for many people. That's an issue that will need to be addressed.

But I agree with you. I'm a firm believer that the net effect of technology is always positive so yes, the economy will keep expanding and we may have to figure out new metrics to measure it and possibly a whole new economic theory for that matter.

!PIZZA

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

But I agree with you. I'm a firm believer that the net effect of technology is always positive so yes

Hard to debate it. Human history shows how we advance as a result of major technological development. It is often painful for many but does result in much greater levels.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

In answering your question, technology is already affecting economies positively and will continue to.

We can see the impact of technology on the economy when we compare and contrast the economy of a developed nation with that of an under-developed nation.

The technological standard of a developed nation is far higher than that of an under-developed nation which then affects their respective economies.

However, while technology brings about expansion, it also brings some side-effects like people losing their jobs and robots taking over the workforce.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well said that Technology is destroying jobs but I think this is also helping to open new areas of the employment. It also encourage towards smart work rather than hard work.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000