The Great Artificial Intelligence Race

Many have said that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is the invention we will ever make. Few dispute how it would alter society completely. However, there is great debate as to when it will be achieved among AI experts.

Some believe that we are looking at the capability in the next 15-20 years while other feel it is decades, if not centuries, out. There is even a portion of the AI community who feels we will never see AGI.

At the same time, there is also debate about how it will be if it is achieved. Will it benefit humanity or be the end of us as a species? This is a question that is hotly contested.


Source

Needless to say, the purpose that we use AI for today and the entities that are controlling it do not paint an optimistic picture. We have governments who are using AI to enhance their military capabilities, i.e. kill people more efficiently. They are also engaging in mass surveillance of the population.

On the corporate front, we also have surveillance in an effort to better target the individuals. This is done so for the purpose of advertising. Hence, AI is just another tool to try and sell people more stuff.

There is another line of thinking (pun intended) that believes AI is being used to "program" people. By dictating what they can see and the information they have access to, these systems can basically dominate what is presented to us. This is where many feel the social media companies are going.

Nevertheless, for the sake of this article, we will focus upon the AI race that is at hand.

The entrants are as follows, in the order of where they stand:

  • China
  • United States
  • Western Europe

This is basically a two horse race but Western Europe is trying desperately to catch up. What is at stake is very high. The belief is that the leader by 2030 will likely dominate the rest of this century.

Data Data And More Data

AI systems today are dependent upon data. This is no secret. It is really a pretty simple system.

Our overriding AI approach is to take larges amounts of data and feel it into powerful machines. Through repetition, we have machine learning. Hence, more data and more powerful computers are always sought out.

From this perspective, China is in the lead. Thus, they have the advantage. Nobody generates more data than China. Not only do they have the largest population in the world, they also have a technologically advanced society. Everything in that country is monitored and under surveillance. Leaving aside the human rights abuses, the bottom line is an incredible amount of data is available.

If this is the future of AI, China will likely be the clear winner. No other area is going to catch up to China with the amount of data is generates. Even if the U.S. and EU progress forward at a rapid pace, China is doing the same.

Paradigm Shift

There is a line of thinking among AI experts that a paradigm shift is required to make the leap to the next level.

Our present approach requires too much energy and is far too slow to make any significant progress. We must remember we are still very early in the process and, overall, have not really accomplished that much on the "intelligence" end.

Some experts believe that another mode is needed to progress towards the AGI level. This means learning that requires a much smaller data sets. Some are experimenting in that area with some degree of success.

This is where China could face some issues. Innovation is the key here. While China is a country that excels at "copying", it traditionally have not been great at coming up with new innovations. A society that is under a social credit system does not foster independent and contrarian thinking. These are often required for massive development in a completely new direction.

An AI learning system that does not require near as much data and computational power could be to the United States and Western Europe's advantage. They could close the gap a lot quicker since the data advantage would be relegated moot. This would alter the playing field that the battle is being waged, perhaps even tilting it in the West's favor.

The latest concept that is being pursued is to replicate how learning actually happens in the brain. Many are starting to approach the idea of creating an "artificial brain" that mirrors that of a human. The hope is that AI systems will learn similar to the way children learn. This would allow for the same evolutionary learning process, just at a much quicker pace.

Who will win the end is hard to determine. At this point, the race might be a distraction from the bigger picture.

If AI has the ability to create the most wonderful decade humans ever saw, or start the process to end human life, perhaps we ought to focus upon if designing autonomous system that can kill and/or grow in power is a wise path to pursue.

After all, what good is winning the race if a "higher" species enters and decides we are just a nuisance?

I guess, in the end, the natural path of every human is eventually death anyway. None of us are able to escape it.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
19 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 40 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
5

0
0
0.000
avatar

The data generated by China is just too much and especially when they are also applying the technology. Most of the other countries are hesitant towards doing some of the more extreme things that they do. I think AI can be either good or bad depending on who develops it. But I completely agree that China is in the lead. In fact, I have heard that they are allowing their allies to use their technology (which means more data) so it does come down to who has enough data to train their algorithms.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

China is one bomb on their major dam away from being destroyed.
I would not worry about them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

China has many issues right now. Internal conflict, food shortage (floods destroyed their crops), the virus rampaging (signified by their lockdowns of areas), energy shortage (ban on coal) and many more. I think right now they are only focused on trying to survive. And one of the way it is trying to survive is to control their citizens (ethics aside) so I believe AI will be more rampant in China.

About the dam, I believe while it will not survive for too long but it will take at least a few years because of the way it was built (money stolen through corruption).

0
0
0.000
avatar

Don't forget extreme pollution that has long term consequences that at the moment no one cares about or they can't afford to care about.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are presuming the training of AI in the future is still going to require a large amount of data.

All indications are that we will see a new paradigm emerge that requires a lot less data.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Advances in AI technology are good, but I think it would be dangerous for small developing countries to fall into the hands of a corrupt leader.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Wow, AI is such an exciting topic! It ignites the imagination and the vision about the future of humanity.

After all, what good is winning the race if a "higher" species enters and decides we are just a nuisance?

I believe that humanity will risk this because man is a curious being and will want to see the answer to this question.

I guess, in the end, the natural path of every human is eventually death anyway. None of us are able to escape it.

Really? Immortality has been mankind's first concern since the beginning, maybe AI will help solve this problem, probably not for everyone but there will be a few chosen ones!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

AI scares the crap out of me. I understand the uses and all of that stuff and how beneficial it can be, but I am one of those crazies who kind of think we are playing with stuff we shouldn't be. Either that or we should at least be a little careful with all of it. I think there have been enough fictional accounts that we should be using a little caution as we move forward.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

We certainly are racing ahead without many safeguards being put in place. This is entering the truly unknown.

Might we, humans, end up like animals, simply just something that and ignored until it is in our way. Or is it a situation where AI will feel the threat from us needing to eliminate it.

Or could it possibly be the path to where every human problem is solved rapidly and in the most efficient way?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hopefully it is the latter. I don't know how well I would fair in a Terminator type world :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Data is the new gold and AI is a tool that can make a comprehensive judgement based on it. It's our last invention, especially if we apply the concept of AGI to a point with no return.

Once the quantump comptures combine with AI... Like fuck, really powerfull concept to visualize.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah that is the other challenge. The pace things will go at will astound us.

A lot taking place in the next 15 years.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is a great post! I've been reading the book Life 3.0 and this in line with what the future holds!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000