Robots Are Coming For More Jobs Post COVID-19

COVID-19 accelerated many technology trends that were already in place. The idea of robotics and artificial intelligence taking people's jobs is nothing new. However, this is taking on new meaning as a result of the virus.

Technological unemployment is being hotly debated. Many feel that there is nothing to worry about. After all, the view is that technology always creates more jobs than it destroys.


Source

In fairness, that was always the case. There are a couple items that might shoot holes in this defense.

The first is the fact that while technology creates more jobs than it destroys, there is often a time delay. Many point to the Luddites as the poster children of a group of people who senselessly fought against technology. The problem is that things did not end well for them. In fact, the first 60-70 years of the Industrial Revolution were not very smooth or friendly to workers. Lest we forget child labor and fights with management that ended up in gunfire on a number of occasions.

Secondly, we are seeing technology advancing at a pace never seen before. Artificial Intelligence is something that humanity never dealt with before. The potential job destruction is not even within our comprehension at this moment. It will, however, become clearer as the next few years go by.

These points are exemplified by an article in Forbes that quotes the World Economic Forum:

Millions of people have lost their jobs due to the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and now the machines will take away even more jobs from workers, according to the WEF. The organization cites that automation will supplant about 85 million jobs by 2025. WEF says there’s nothing to worry about since its analysis anticipates the future tech-driven economy will create 97 million new jobs. Currently, approximately 30% of all tasks are done by machines—and people do the rest. However, by the year 2025, it's believed that the balance will dramatically change to a 50-50 combination of humans and machines.

Source

This is a fairly typical outlook. We often hear of how many jobs will be created by (fill in the blank). Unfortunately, as history shows us, often they do not materialize as many thought.

There is also, naturally, the idea of creating quality jobs, something that did not take place in the last few decades.

Many respond to this by claiming that we are going to have to resort to retraining. It is another idea that is great in theory but fails in practice. Again, historically, we find that the success rate of corporate America in retraining employees is abysmal. We see a rate of around 10%.

If we need to retrain 3 million people over the next half decade, it is likely that only 300K are accomodated.

We are looking at a situation where millions of people are going to lack the skills to gain employment in the near future. COVID-19 appears to only quicken the pace that this all if happening.

This latest recession is likely going to produce another "lost generation". During the last economic collapse, we saw millions of people who lost their income status, never to get back to that place.

These people were in the mid 50s and were cast aside by Corporate America. They had to do whatever they could to make ends meet such as driving cabs or buses. In the end, they just bought some time until they could take Social Security. In short, their entire financial status was destroyed.

This time, we will find many others affected. With AI, we are not looking at only blue collar workers who are at risk. Many office jobs are being eliminated at a pace that exceeds that even seen in manufacturing.

Fortunately, with the expansion of cryptocurrency platforms, people are going to have options provided for them. As token distribution grows on all levels, people will gain choices they never had before. This holds for both the developed countries as well as those lagging behind.

However all this unfolds, it is obvious people are going to need options.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

vision2025.png

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
20 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 29 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
11

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are still many aspects that require a human touch. On top of my head, one example that I detest is AI on banking customer service. One time recently, I made an atm cash deposit that though "confirmed" as seen on the screen, and I got a receipt, there was no SMS (which I did not notice). The following day I tried to use my card for purchase, it got declined apparently for insufficient balance. 😵 I called the bank toll free number and but I never got the information I needed as there was no way to speak to someone, but only to an AI with limited answers that just kept going 360° like an ID!0t. 😵🙄😜 I ended up visiting the branch to get annswer.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are many examples like that but the reality is the corporations do not care. How much do we all complain about the answering tree we go through when calling the cable company? Yet, what do we all do? Go through the answering tree when calling the cable company.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

COVID-19 as some man say get more divorces, get more thief because people who do not have money to food their families maybe do not have options than the crime, unfortunately, we hope the humanity could create a enough employees to supply to all people who losses their job, imagine the artificial intelligence is enough powerfull to create a drive car without a man driver.well this is amazing if you thinking.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Domestic violence rates also are stated to have gone up because of COVID-19 and people stuck around each other.

It is sad that the negative side of humanity shines through at moments like this.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

yeah I think we are starting to see what the future will be like

0
0
0.000
avatar

If I have to say
if I was a factory owner I would use robot because we don't know if pandemic like covid happens in future so I say its a good step to make thing automatic as much as possible.
because I don't want to stop my income because of lockdown.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of course, if any of us were the ones owning the factories or companies, we would implement ai and robots because they are not only resistant to the pandemic, but also better for profit margins.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

True that unemployment rates are going to reach some more all-time figures especially in developing countries who are very clueless on the cons of AI tech adoption. This has always been my fear with AI when it endangers human survival. This happens because the pace of tech revolution is faster than the building of capacity in humans to cater for the new tech.

many are lost to the understanding that many banking jobs would be taken away as it has already. With more digital data capturing, the workforce needed in corporate firms would have to reduce.

Fortunately, with the expansion of cryptocurrency platforms, people are going to have options provided for them. As token distribution grows on all levels, people will gain choices they never had before. This holds for both the developed countries as well as those lagging behind.

How many are ready to adopt blockchain and cryptocurrency? I've got angry with myself for "bugging" people with my crypto stories. Some of them are just too dull to understand. The adoption of tech in my locality is lopsided. People love the "edifice" tech but don't want to get schooled at using them.

I'll love some suggestions on how to help out with aiding adoption. I', presently trying to use charity. I don't know how far that can help.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The best way to lead is by example. Become a success story yourself then you can tell others what you did. After all, people listen to those who achieved success.

It is easier to get through to people when you are telling them what you did as opposed to what is going to happen.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

How do you train a former middle manager at an auto factory or an assembly line worker to become a competent software engineer? There seems to be unlimited demand for competent software professionals. But the field is one that involves a lot of complexity and where skills get old fast. It's a high-IQ profession. A small percentage of the population is talented enough for a career in software engineering. Another thing is that there are a lot of smart people who are just not technical enough.

The pool of people from which programmers and software architects etc. can be recruited is quite small. The combination of sufficient intelligence and stomach for dealing with highly technical stuff all day is rare. Absent strong AI, that could actually significantly slow down accelerating gains from technology absent very significant productivity enhancements through AI. But software development is still very much a craft. There is very little in it that can be automated. It's a messy world where building complex systems that work and are maintainable is very expensive because of the manual work required. Even after all these decades it's an immature industry.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly. The idea that people will be able to transfer their skills is absurd especially since most people are truly lacking in real world skills. At least in the United States, we churned out, from the university level, a lot of lawyers and finance people. Those are two professions that will be affected by AI to varying degrees.

There seems to be unlimited demand for competent software professionals.

This is likely to be automated too. There is already self evolving AI out there which basically codes itself.

There is a chance that for all the "learn how to code" mantra being preached, that might be largely automated too.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Coding will be automated eventually. But I really don't believe it will be automated any time soon. The complexity of software engineering is hard to overstate. We're not talking about some typical problem domain that lends itself to the big data approach. We're talking about seriously complex conceptual hierarchies. Programming is all about abstract thought - and bugs and incompatibility problems that might stem from any layer in the stack. It's remarkable how little progress has been made in the field in all these decades. A lot of other engineering disciplines have evolved into mature industries where standard practices go a long way at producing predictably high-quality results.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

AI is precisely the reason I'm trying to get off grid and minimise my cost of living - Working online, writing blogposts for SEO to attract people to buy my educational resources - that's precisely the kind of thing AI will be doing pretty soon (writing the posts that is).

I'm actually surprised my main income has held up as well as it has.

I think there may be a sustainable market in online tuition with a personal touch - Zoom with an actual human on the other end, students do like real people, and we're a long way off robots being able to replicate the humanity that goes with education!

But as to writing/ blogging tasks I think the days of my earning an income from that, or anyone else are numbered!

Hence why I need to be reducing my income - I don't want to have to go back into face to face to face teaching, that'd be a disaster!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is always sound practice to keep the expenses in check. We never know what is going to happen and those without a cushion while also having a monthly expense ratio that is too high get into a lot of trouble.

Fortunately, I think a lot more opportunities will open up in the digital/virtual realm so those who are accustomed to operating here will do alright.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Although I think the best opportunities are for those with coding skills, if you're just a writer, maybe not so!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very detailed analysis here. Covid does have a negative impact on the job market and economy as more people gravitate towards technology in place of manual labour. But in the end, society has a way of adjusting and balancing technological disruptions.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

@taskmaster4450le, Atleast they will free humans from those Chaotic Jobs, hopefully people will going to shift towards Agriculture, the natural work for Humans. Stay blessed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The question would be if they are creating robots to replace men and women in factories to make the automation of processes more effective and to be able to produce more. Now who would acquire all these products, if they are taking away people's source of income, how would that balance be?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good blog!
I think this is an irreversible process and Covid isn't helping.
We're have to be lucky that computers don't have the ability to be creative (yet), so creative jobs will still be needed.
Since this is irreversible we should accept that there will not be enough jobs for everyone. There have been some experiments in the past with basic income (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/24/canada-basic-income-trial-ontario-summer) some of them were quite sucessful.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000