RE: Wikipedia is Corrupt & Its Integrity is For Sale - These Are Your Blockchain Alternatives

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Everipedia sounds pretty dubious, copying only the 'good' parts of Wikipedia? Who chooses which parts are good? How do you make something good by copying something bad? I'll check them out, but this wasn't a very good sell, didn't explain anything about how these alternatives would be different.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

The main difference is that it is not controlled by a small group with a bad track record when it comes to doxxing and violation people's privacy and lacking integrity in their editing. There is nothing dubious about https://everipedia.org It's bigger and more informative than Wikipedia. Use it for a while and you will look at Wikipedia as fit was something from stone age.

Additional Reading:
https://atmaunum.com/2021/01/16/surviving-wikipedia-grinchs/

0
0
0.000
avatar

They won't be winning me over just yet... search is slow and clunky, they want me to create an account (huge disadvantage), and they don't even HAVE an article for Wikipedia. I'll keep an eye on it, but so far it just looks like a Wikipedia clone that hasn't had time to make a bad name for itself.

0
0
0.000