RE: Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger Creates A Forum To Decentralize Social Media - Thinks HIVE (Blockchain) is Crap

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

What an asshole, his only argument is that everything it's controlled by whales. Also Wikipedia is controlled by those with more reputation. And he hasn't asked himself how many time our whales would control this blockchain if a million users would come here suddently?.

The distribution of Hive can change the inneficience of the web 2.0 is much harder to change than that.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

I wrote an article about the issues that exist with Wikipedia and I couldn't find it because the search features on HIVE blockchain are terrible, again proving this claim to be utterly delusional garbage:

On the bright side, I can share these material with you:

https://ecency.com/pizzagate/@rebelskum/my-attempts-to-fairly-edit-the-pizzagate-conspiracy-theory-wikipedia-page
https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/05/wikipedia-is-broken-controlled-by-special-interests-and-bad-actors-says-co-founder
https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/10/22/175674/the-decline-of-wikipedia

Why is Wikipedia so useless?
In a recent MIT Technology Review article, “The Decline of Wikipedia,” Tom Simonite documents how the site’s increasingly “labyrinthine,” bureaucratic editing protocols drive away would-be new contributors, leaving the task to an overworked, insular hierarchy less interested in accuracy than in upholding some vague Wikipedian ideal.
It’s chilling because so many people — young journalists especially — look to Wikipedia first. They not only shun print reference sources, they even balk at scouring the Web for information if it entails, God forbid, clicking on more than a single link.
About show business, Wikipedia is chronically wrong, routinely awarding Oscars and Emmys to performers who were merely nominated for them.
It’s unbalanced to the point of defamation about corporate America. The entry for admittedly controversial Monsanto is no balanced history of a Fortune 500 company with 22,000 employees, but an indictment — even including a long section on Monsanto’s supposed role in driving farmers in India to commit suicide.
A matter of interpretation? No, it’s propaganda. And there are no shades of gray when it comes to easily verifiable facts about our home town’s bricks and mortar.
Donald Trump’s entry doesn’t even mention Trump Tower, his flagship property familiar to any viewer of “The Apprentice,” except to say that he “renovated the Trump Tower in New York City.”
It doesn’t say when the alleged renovation took place, what Trump Tower is, where it is, or even that Trump built it. He never “renovated” the mostly condo building, he merely at one point redesigned its shopping atrium.

That was from a 2013 article (things have gotten worse now): https://nypost.com/2013/11/16/dont-trust-anything-on-wikipedia



Take your time to check them out. There are so much information that most people have no idea about.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I wrote an article about the issues that exist with Wikipedia and I couldn't find it because the search features on HIVE blockchain are terrible,

Maybe this could help you to your search https://hivesearcher.com, I need some time to look all the info you've posted here 😅. I'm aware that wikipedia has a lot of technical and moral issues with the info that displays. That would be another interesting debate though.

0
0
0.000