RE: Dash is The Sleeping Giant That Has Done What HIVE Should Have Done A Long Time Ago!

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Well comparing hive to dash is like comparing the horse and buggy to Elon Musk Falcon rocket or something. Alot of people i think especially on hive totally out of touch with what dash has done. They don't even probably know or have a clue. You also described two projects with larger than life inspirational leadership. I know everyone values decentralization but the reality of the situation is these projects both had systems in place that just were advanced and well done as far as organization.

Hive we got crappy leaders feels like a ragtag team of folks just out there. It's alot would need to happen for hive to be even on that kinda level. The thing though is yes a killer dapp may be the solution but what would it be seeing that everyone has done everything.. I just don't know about all that. When i created the bbd coin and btcmyk token it dealt alot with ubi and easy ui's. That is because at this point we gotta throw ourselves on the mercy of the people.. lol. we also gotta resonate with them and i call ubi the ultimate airdrop that gets you hooked for life.. The problem is i mean is hive going to really create that killer dapp.. i dont think so.. I'm not trying to put it down but do you really see that? With what you've seen so far? Splinterlands about the closest we can get to that and its doing its part but i guess its done as much as it can do.. So idk i feel a bit not very optimistic about that i think ubi would create enough marketing buzz especially after covid especially if you have an easy ui.. then people will kinda be like oh this kinda makes sense and polls suggest like 50% would opt for it.. So that i find as a practical approach.

What you have to understand about dash is dash had funds to help setup businesses down in Venezuela.. Listen to this Dash marketing campaigns were so much on fire.. there was only one advertisement as big as theirs in the entire country? Do you know who that was? Maduro the leader the president and do you know what next to his biggest ad was coming into the capitol of Venezuela?

You guessed it Dash. Dash was the second most recognizable thing in the country. When you go into the capitol its this like 50ft tall picture of Maduro then there is dash next to it. THey paid for the marketing. is hive ever going to do something like that. I think we both know the answer to that. THats why i keep telling you all we need a symbol to get behind. Dash you could say their work wasn't just economic but humanitarian. They held workshops to get your businesses to accept dash and funded them. You udnerstand? is hive doing anything like that. will it ever do anythig like that.

Hive can't even understand a concept as simple as bitcoin myk ubi thats going to draw 100 million users. They still gambling with defi and defi apps.. defi only had about 400k participants. So they don't even know what they doing. Dash knew thats the big difference lol.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar

This comment has a different view from mine, but I find this comment very interesting. Thanks for sharing

0
0
0.000
avatar

Okay but i still don't understand what you'd want hive to do different? Hive already formed that dao that if they wanted to create a huge marketing campaign people have the freedom to do that. So thats similar to what dash did. Are you just feeling hive behind because they chose not to do that? The problem is if they chose not to its still not due to a deficiency in the systems ability somehow. Maybe they just don't wanna do it.

No i think i went the right way with the comment. This is a fear culture here. If people agree with me on the mistakes of hive you may get downvoted or you may not get upvotes lol. I think thats similar to a fear culture. They say its a consequence system. Sure it could be that. It could also just be a control system lol.

I do feel sorry for some who have agreed with me. They lose money..That sucks but at the same time it must not be pleasant for them to be in that situation and i dont try to put them in there some safely don't respond. If you do respond maybe i should put up a waiver lol.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your reply, Hive is a very young blockchain, just over a year old. Not marketing can also be a choice. The fact is that currently Hive has an interesting ecosystem and has several use cases, unlike other blockchains that have more market value, but have no use cases. Conclusion: I'd simply give the HIVE developers more time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"Hive is a very young blockchain, just over a year old. Not marketing can also be a choice."

Yes i 'd have to push back a little on this statement. Hive is a very young chain is it really though? I mean i thought it was a fork almost a direct clone of steem with a very high percentage of the same user base. All the accounts on steem existed for the most part on hive. Even before the fork happened the same exact people holding the bigger positions and witnesses were right back there. This to me doesn't feel appropriate to suggest a new chain like it came out of the ether. Some see it as the more real version of steem in any event nothing feels new to me about this chain.

In fact one of my greatest concerns was noticing that the chain was having issues before Justin Sun's arrival and i was wondering if those same exact people forking a chain can i expect anything different than what they were doing prior to Justin Sun.

I'd also like to address the idea of not marketing is a choice. Well i'm not sure that's necessarily true. For example if that Dao were used to create a marketing budget on the scale like you've spoken of if at similar to Dash. Then on that Dao that is a money influenced system. Which means the people with the most money have the most control thats not really democratic or wealth decentralized.

So that means ultimately you would still have a small percentage of people who can pass these projects through. However chances are they won't. is because in many cases if i was a developer. I think of this like my contractor at home. If he wants to build something at my residence he starts proposing he wants to build x. Now in reality the build may not even be necessary. As a contractor his livelihood and job is in building. So developers in crypto sometimes can care more about building and getting a paycheck than the improvement and growth of the chain unfortunately. So overlooking marketing that doesn't line their pockets directly may not be appealing and that may be why they made that choice or didn't make it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000