RE: Liquified risk and reward

avatar
(Edited)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Im going to be perfectly honest to you now, in the sake of building a constructive conversation:
the biggest risk to the platform is stakeholders that vote shit content from underdeveloped countries, even if the HP part is withheld to vote for more of that shit, HP that comes from shit content will most likely vote for shit content in the future, or at least its reasonable to think so.
The stake holders that vote for such content, think very short term, only in the illusion that "user retention" of shit users will get a real investor to pop in, not noticing this is a den of abuse, and investing. Those strategies are destined to fail imo, and they have failed for 4 years, onboarding shit, doesnt work.
So liquified or not, they are missing the point, and I think
, intentionally.
The idea, apparently , seems to be that if we support enough shit content that will make quality content producers to come, or that at least we can keep the traffic numbers up, again, it wont work. and you know it.



0
0
0.000
0 comments