RE: Community communication of the code

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

There is simpke way around that, do not vote for current witnesses that do not take care of their community.

But then again, Wait... don't their vote euqal enougj to vote for the circle? :)

Theoretically idea of governance was good, but in practice peiple are poeple. No universally perfect forms of governance.

Posted using Dapplr



0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

Witness voting and governance is a different thing. You don't just want witnesses that are good at communicating with the community, you want some who are highly technical.

But, they should get together and find a way to keep as many people as possible informed. Pay someone to do so if they must, at least around hardfork time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You vote for witneses and they introduce, communicate and implement the changes in protocol apart running hardware for block production don't they?

I get that not everybody that are implementing changes and write code are witnesses. But it should be that most prominent actors that influence those changes are voted for witnesses and their job should be to inform their community about incoming updates and discuss it. In a perfect world i.e.

Now there is a big disconnect. Witnesses are on one side, dev team on the other and community somewhere else. That is a trait of decentralised governance with no prominent leader. While it seems very democratic it is quie unefficient at the same time. People need leaders, that is harwired into our nature.

Posted using Dapplr

0
0
0.000
avatar

I do think that all witnesses (consensus) should offer their perspective on the hardfork - but I would like to see them come to some kind of point where the candidate is at least made very, very publicly aware to give everyone a chance to get onboard or weigh in or whatever.

Decentralized governance is likely (for a long time to come) going to be inefficient, but at least it isn't so efficient it favors only 0.1% of the community.

0
0
0.000
avatar

BTW, how are you finding Dapplr so far?

0
0
0.000
avatar

So far so good. Team has put great effort into design, voting slide is neat, fun and convenient. Few UI details that i am sure will be updated as it is still work in progress. But move in the right direction.

Other than that, no quality changes from UX, still miss adding suplementary keywords and ability to search for the content that i find relevant.

Seemingly quite a simple feat that requires some work of course, but while dev team is beatong around the bushes tweaking rewards scheme what they fail is making a content orientated frontend that would give it utility if i want to find the content i need imho.

I still remember that you find rewards part as a utility, but i am talking about a different utility, one that any person not familiar with crypto would welcome and use application for other purposes than getting rewarded and where rewards would be a welcome nice addition to otherwise useful and fun app.

Posted using Dapplr

0
0
0.000