RE: Liquified risk and reward
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Ah, in the end I'm too lazy and too small to play the maximisation games. I vote on the post if I like it and at the time I see it. In the end, for little people like me, the difference between a inefficient vote and maximised vote means little in the way of curation.
I can see that it would be a good way to bootstrap an account with new followers.. But in some ways, it feels like the airdrop style of thinking. Projects thought that giving people free tokens would bootstrap an audience... But the majority were there only for the free lunch.
Likewise, I think it will definitely bootstrap a follower and curation audience, but will it be a lasting and meaningful following?
Edit: I'm curious how it pans out, but I'm not sure that I would use it at the moment (either as poster or voter).
I am the same and it takes the fun out of it for me to try and maximize.
It is relative, as for the large accounts, the difference might seem much more in Hive, but then, they likely don't care that much either way, much like yourself. Many do though at all levels. I see a lot of accounts maximizing with very little stake when they would be better off doing something that adds value and gets support-.
Unlikely - how many of the "bidbot trenders" are there still here? I think where this app has its real merits is in running lotteries and the like. I could see myself charging up a kitty, then having it randomly go out to curators on a post - kind of like a surprise or, the same thing for engagement posts like Galen runs.
Huh, that is definitely an interesting use!