RE: How Do You Write Your STEM Post?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

a bunch of references on lightly spun content doesn't make it interesting. I prefer a dose of curious/ odd/ gross/ whatever

0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar

Some people are more interested in writing textbooks than showing what the textbooks meant.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Some people are more interested in writing textbooks than showing what the textbooks meant. - enforcer48

I can't think of another phrase to put the thoughts right but this line above sums up why I pursued the manner I wrote my posts.

I think it's gone to a level where when I say this looks like an endometriotic cyst on grossing due to the typical features the specimen has to a colleague and they'd check and nod like I just showed them an apple being red.

But writing a STEM post here just sounds like I have to source the proof why endometriotic cysts got nicknamed chocolate cysts because they contain chocolate colored degenerated blood and this is the science why plus articles. To add some credibility. I get how the source the material became a thing after charlatans started posting for rewards.

0
0
0.000
Reply