Isnochys Math Problem #1 [HSBI]

avatar

Let's try something different today.
I have a math issue.
You solve it.
Next week one gets HSBI.
Very easy.
If you know how to program anything.
Or if you can count, at least in todays issue:

A list of all natural numbers below 20, in there we search multiples of 5 and 7. 
This gives us 5,7,10,14,15 and sum it up: 51

Your task is: 
Sum up the multiples of 5 and 7 below 1000.

Next week, I will publish the result and the python code I used to calculate it.

As you know me, every answer gets beer.

The earlier you answer, the higher your chances on winning are.

Don't forget to witness vote for me!:)

Posted with STEMGeeks



0
0
0.000
23 comments
avatar

The people doing V2K with remote neural monitoring want me to believe this lady @battleaxe is an operator. She is involved deeply with her group and @fyrstikken . Her discord is Battleaxe#1003. I cant prove she is the one directly doing the V2K and RNM. Doing it requires more than one person at the least. It cant be done alone. She cant prove she is not one of the ones doing it. I was drugged in my home covertly, it ended badly. They have tried to kill me and are still trying to kill me. I bet nobody does anything at all. Ask @battleaxe to prove it. I bet she wont. They want me to believe the V2K and RNM in me is being broadcast from her location. And what the fuck is "HOMELAND SECURITY" doing about this shit? I think stumbling over their own dicks maybe? Just like they did and are doing with the Havana Syndrome https://ecency.com/fyrstikken/@fairandbalanced/i-am-the-only-motherfucker-on-the-internet-pointing-to-a-direct-source-for-voice-to-skull-electronic-terrorism

0
0
0.000
avatar

5: Existiert 200 mal bis einschließlich 1000. Durchschnittlich 502,5: (1000+5)/2

7: Existiert 142 mal. Durchschnittlich 500,5:. (994+7)/2

200 x 502,5 + 142 x 500,5 = 171.571

Nachdem es aber "below 1000" heißt, müssen die 1000 noch abgezogen werden:

170.571 wäre demnach das Ergebnis.

Oder hab ich mich verrechnet? 🤔

0
0
0.000
avatar

Interessanter Ansatz :)
Schauen wir mal bis 20:
(20+5)/2 = 12,5
(14+7)/2 = 10,5
5 gibt es 4x und 7 gibt es 2x:
4x12,5 + 2x10,5 = 71
71 -20 = 51

Das passt.
Aber du hast in deinem Ansatz die 35 z.B. doppelt gezählt :)
!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

Urgh...

Du hast natürlich Recht. Ich hab die Schnittmenge schlicht vergessen...
!LUV

Man müsste die doppelten Zahlen noch abziehen. Das geht mit meinem Ansatz auch recht einfach. Da ich mich für disqualifiziert betrachte, schick ich dir das Ergebnis per Memo :D

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank your for participating
!BEER

;)

0
0
0.000
avatar

11

0
0
0.000
avatar

ok
!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

You need to stake more BEER (24 staked BEER allows you to call BEER one time per day)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh sorry I wrote that's by mistake

0
0
0.000
avatar

You also dindn't get any !BEER
:))

0
0
0.000
avatar

You need to stake more BEER (24 staked BEER allows you to call BEER one time per day)

0
0
0.000
avatar

But now
!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

You need to stake more BEER (24 staked BEER allows you to call BEER one time per day)

0
0
0.000