Deciding on Trade-offs

avatar

         It would appear the automatic acid fast staining machine is no longer operational. Such is work at a high volume lab. The machines are bound to break in time. And this stainer from ELITechGroup has gotten a lot of mileage in its lifetime.

         With the machine down, there has been a debate to whether the department should replace it. The main argument lies on the quality of the slides. Some felt that the auto-stainer produced less quality slides than manual methods. To give you an idea, here are two pictures I took of each method.

         The top picture is of the machine. The bottom is by hand. Those are QC slides from Alpha-Tec. It's unfortunate the iPhoneXR's camera can't do fluorescent slides justice. The phone could not capture the details as well as I would have liked. But, you can see there are some differences between the slides.

         The machine-stained slides tend to have more noise in the field. By noise, I meant more debris reflecting light and obstructing your view. To me, it's a nuisance and doesn't actually affect how you interpret the slide. After all, what we are looking for are these guys.


Source

         Putting that into perspective, I hope you see why I said the phone didn't do a great job.

Why is this important?

         The acid fast bacillus stain (AFB stain) is how the lab determines if acid fast organisms are present. There's always a preliminary stain for when the patient sample is first processed. Then, when the culture has positive growth, it's used to determine the culture's purity. We determine purity in conjunction with gram stains. Susceptibility testing is only possible with pure, isolated, culture.

         In short, having a clearer field of view is helpful for proper diagnosis. At the same time, an experienced personnel shouldn't have problems sifting through noise.


         What would you do as a lab supervisor? Would you get another machine? Or, would you force your crew through the manual method when you have high volume?

Posted with STEMGeeks



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 57 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
13

0
0
0.000
avatar

Get another machine. The manual stains look better though. But if it's a high volume lab and more manpower is diverted on this task that means less manpower can be put on other important tasks.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am almost positive this will be the direction we will go.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Depending on how old the machine was the quality might be much better now. I say get a new machine. It is just the cost of doing business. Plus it is going to save the workers from getting backlogged which could cost you more money than the new machine is worth.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The machine was about 5 years old.

We really rack up the mileage when we do several times more volume than a typical lab.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi!
Remove your witness vote to https://peakd.com/@discovery-it they don't believe in freedom of speech, the believe in destroy people and believe in power.
@phage93 and @discovery-blog / @discovery-it wanna cut all the little fish living and breathing in hive. They are able to "kill" a man on hive but if we don't vote, don't delegate and remove the witness, we can stop this madness.

have a nice day

I am availiable for answer to your question on discord if you want.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The only thing you will receive from me is downvotes until you stop spamming people with this bs.

0
0
0.000