COVID Antigen Test: Sofia SARS Antigen FIA

avatar

         What does microbiology has to do with Covid testing? On paper, not much since the whole ordeal is more aligned with molecular pathology. But, my department still helps out with some aspects of testing to ease the burden.

         We use the Sofia SARS Antigen FIA from Quidel corporation. As the picture from the company website states, it's a fluorescent immunoassay. In simple terms, it means it uses antigen-antibody reactions. The result is the release of fluorescent molecules which a detector picks up. You can read in greater details follow the link and read the various inserts.

         For the curious, the antigen of the test is the nucleocapsid protein (shell) of the virus. The test calls for nasopharyngeal swabs (the deep kind) from patients. Our medical director sought to validate this test to work on saliva due to the unpleasant deep swabs. Alas, the effort did not work out, so everyone is still stuck with the uncomfortable poke in the back of your nose.

When do we perform this test?

         We only do this for patients in the ER, who the clinician are considering admitting. A viral transport media (VTM) accompanies each patient swab. All Covid antigen tests are stat tests.

The test kit has several components:

  1. Reagent tube with buffer
  2. Ampoule with salt solution
  3. 120µl pipette
  4. Testing cassette

         The fist part of running the test has to be inside a biosafety hood. To start, you add the solution into the tube and inoculate the patient sample. Incubate it for 1 minute. Then, use the pipette to transfer the solution onto the cassette.

         The patient sample goes into the well. The arrows indicate the direction you put into the Sofia 2 Analyzer. I edited out the QR code even though it's the cassette's own serial number. That part needs to be clear in order for the analyzer to process it. So, don't obstruct it in any way.

         Here, we have two choices depending on the work load.

         The cassette needs to incubate at room temperature for about 15 minutes. On the analyzer, you can see who options: walk away and read now.

         Walk away means you let the incubation happen inside the machine and it will automatic time and read it. Read now will tell the machine to read it immediately. The Sofia 2 will display a huge positive or negative sign when it finishes the test. So far, I have never gotten an invalid result.

What's next?

         Depending on the result, there are different actions.

         A positive result requires a stat callback to the ER. We cache the VTM. No further action.

         A negative result requires we order a PCR test. We send the VTM to molecular department.

         A negative result doesn't mean you do not have the virus. It could mean your viral load is below detection limit. Quidel claims their test kit has PPA of 96.7% and NPA of 100%. This is relative to the PCR tests. The PPA means it's in agreement 96.7% of the times.

So, how often do we perform the antigen test?

         The answer from personal experience is around 10-12 a day. That means there are 10-12 patients in the ER each day with suspected Covid infection. It's not uncommon to see 2-4 positive results a day either. This is to give you a perspective of what is happening. And this only applies to what I am seeing at my workplace.

Posted with STEMGeeks



0
0
0.000
16 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 35 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
7

0
0
0.000
avatar

In my place, the test results are controversial , a person tested positive at one place and then negative at another and sued the government ( where he did his first test). And then the government issued guidelines that you can test at one place only - they capture bio-metrics even to make sure someone cannot undergo a second test. What could be the the cause of this ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Depends.

  1. How long between each test. It takes time for your viral load to be detectable.

  2. Bad specimen collection.

  3. Bad testing kits.

It’s not possible to know unless we actually dive in and study why things didn’t work the way they do.

Although in your example, it seems awfully suspicious that they won’t allow second testing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

it seems awfully suspicious that they won’t allow second testing

Exactly, I always wonder, why they are scared, if they are really worried about public health, they should rather provide transparency and improve their system. But as you know, there is always something cooking in these government schemes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Do you guys have a shortage of testing kits?

Even then...

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's all scam - they fear, people will sue them, if a false positive is reported.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very interesting. I appreciate this post. It was very informative and interesting to see some of what you deal with at your job. I won't bore you with a long drawn out comment :)

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

That machine looks like it probably cost alot of money. But I'm sure it's very useful too.

Edit: looks like it costs about $1500.. was thinking alot more than that honestly. As with most lab machines.

0
0
0.000
avatar

ohh first time i am watching one of these up close!

Also what's the case with the cases now? still increasing, decreasing or stable?

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's always rising.

0
0
0.000
avatar

that's just sad... while we have people in here don't "believe" in the virus at all

0
0
0.000
avatar

A lot of it stems from the distrust in institutions.

0
0
0.000