Deeper Dive: Are Vaccines Causing Dangerous Variants of COVID19 & Increasing Mortality? (Follow Up)
In a recent post that received a lot of views I highlighted a scientific study which claimed to show that imperfect (leaky) vaccines can both increase transmission of a virus and also create an environment where virus variants are empowered to emerge, resulting in an overall negative effect. I also showed simple data that demonstrates that COVID19 cases often increase after vaccine rollouts. I have since dug deeper into this and received positive and negative feedback, which I will take into consideration into this deeper dive.
First of all, there is no doubt that this is a very complicated topic that has many twists and turns. Most of us have never studied virology in much detail and I myself am not professionally trained in a medical field. I am, however, professionally trained in systems engineering which means high level problem solving and analysis. Our body and entire being is a form of system and so it has been natural for me to apply myself to understanding health for my own purposes – partially using these skills. It is also natural for me to want to share what I learn with others and in general people are appreciative of most of what I share.
In this situation I do not have access to labs or large enough resources to run experiments and demonstrate conclusively what I am saying one way or another. So please bare that in mind – I am just using logic and aiming to be objective while using my time to listen to a wide variety of voices (typically focusing on amplifying ones that the mainstream denies in order to ensure that they get heard and that we get to find out if they may have something valuable to add to humanity’s understanding).
For those who question what use it is for someone who is not 'official' to comment on such things, I refer you to the story of the African hero, Kihura Nkuba, who saved many lives - risking his own - when Uganda was forcibly injecting many people (And killing them) with live Polio virus a few decades ago. His story answers your question. Every voice needs to be heard and may hold important puzzle pieces.
Are COVID19 vaccines perfect?
As far as I am aware, no professional has publicly claimed that the COVID19 vaccines are perfect. All medical interventions carry a risk of failure and also usually a risk of injury. However, the subject of just how effective or ineffective they are is an ongoing debate. The waters are heavily soiled by mainstream manipulators, such as the Australian Daily Mail editor who was exposed telling journalists to deliberately rubbish any stories they may right which might possibly make vaccines look bad.
COVID19 vaccines ARE imperfect, they are classed as being ‘leaky’. This means that they do not completely stop transmission of the virus between people. They also are not 100% effective at stopping disease from becoming present in those who contract the SARS CoV2 virus.
This has been demonstrated in numerous ways, including this study on the Pfizer COVID19 vaccine from 11th August, 2021:
Evaluation of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adolescents
As we can see in Figure 3, the efficacy of the vaccine drops significantly for cases with less symptoms of COVID19 but who are still carriers of SARS CoV2. The group who received the vaccine demonstrate the vaccine to appear to be effective at reducing the number of cases of more serious illness when compared to the group who received the placebo (no vaccine being given). However, the vaccine did not appear to significantly reduce the number of cases of people carrying the SARS CoV2 virus, with a smaller number of symptoms or who simply just carried the virus without symptoms. Some have pointed out that the data here appears to have been skewed to give the impression of an efficacy of 90% or more, when in truth the overall efficacy is much lower, perhaps averaging at around 50%.
Source: Figure 3. nejm
This shows that the vaccine does not always prevent infection and thus cannot also stop transmission. The vaccine is therefore imperfect and ‘leaky’.
Can COVID19 Vaccines Drive Transmission of SARS CoV2?
Clearly, a vaccine that does not prevent transmission, but which is being used as a ticket to enter otherwise locked down environments, could be said to be adding to the risk of transmission. People may believe that they cannot transmit the virus or host it due to their vaccination, when this simply is not the case. The drive to have as many people vaccinated as possible would result in less transmission and more safety IF the vaccines were fully effective, but they are NOT.
So just due to the ‘false sense of security’ aspect of the situation, the vaccines can be said to be driving increased transmission in some senses. However, this is not to say that the vaccines actually make transmission more possible per se.
The real risk of increased transmission from such ‘leaky’ vaccines is that the infected human, lacking symptoms, is more able to move around and thus enables the transmission of viruses that would not normally be able to transmit to others due to the host being incapacitated. In the bird study that I linked previously the example was given of animals infected with the most lethal variants of a virus dying off before they could transmit the virus to others – with leaky vaccines making this more likely. While no-one is saying that we should just allow people to die in order to protect everyone else, the vaccines do enable transmission to take place that would otherwise not be possible.
Can COVID19 Vaccines Drive Emergence of New Variants?
This is perhaps the most controversial part of the topic here. There have, as it turns out, been several high profile experts – including French virologist Luc Montagnier (a nobel laureate and the discoverer of the HIV virus) – who have stated that the vaccines are driving the creation of the variants. He and others have cited several mechanisms by which these vaccines can instigate and allow the emergence of new variants.
Professor Montagnier, carrying out his own experiments, was quoted as saying:
“I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine”
Several commenters on Twitter responded to my previous post on this topic (after the post itself ‘went viral’) stating that the post was meaningless because the study I referenced was pre-COVID and was focused in Bird populations. However, there actually are several studies that relate to this in humans and clearly high profile experts concur that the risk is real.
A study in 2007 on Pneumococcal virus strains appears to demonstrate how vaccine ‘pressure’ on the evolution of the virus may have caused a new strain to take hold:
We cannot be absolutely certain that ST69519A strains never existed pre-vaccination, but extensive surveillance pre- and post-vaccination in the US failed to reveal any such strains [14,31], and no such strains have been reported to the MLST database from other parts of the world. Hence, even if these strains did exist pre-vaccination they were likely to be very rare, and it could still be maintained that the immune pressure resulting from PCV7 use selected for the emergence of such strains.
Source: Vaccine Escape Recombinants Emerge after Pneumococcal Vaccination in the United States - PLOS
Numerous other medical professionals of various kinds have agreed for various reasons that imperfect vaccines can drive variant evolution. The recent video that I shared of Dr. Daniel Stock is just one example that I have to hand.
Here’s a quote from the UK Government website in a report on the long term evolution of SARS CoV 2 which also highlight the risk of virus variants gaining emergence through vaccinated people:
we propose that research be focused on vaccines that also
induce high and durable levels of mucosal immunity in order to reduce infection of and transmission from vaccinated individuals. This could also reduce the possibility of variant selection in vaccinated individuals.
Source: UK GOV
So while I am not able to guarantee to you that I personally know what is occurring with any particular variant of SARS CoV 2 at any moment in any given person, I am fairly confident that through a variety of mechanisms, the mass vaccination of people with imperfect vaccines can indeed cause a greater risk of the emergence of newly selected viral variants.
How great is the risk? I cannot say for sure – but this brings us back to the 2nd part of this topic which I covered in my original post several days ago.
Do Vaccine Drives Increase Transmission Of the Virus?
In my previous post I provided graphs that show how the recorded cases of COVID19 increase substantially shortly after major pushes for vaccination within several countries. I was then informed that someone else had already published the same finding but from 90 countries (I then included this data in the post as an update). In short, the basic, publicly available data for COVID cases (based on PCR analysis) shows that fairly consistently, the cases recorded of COVID 19 correlate closely to the number of vaccines being issued – with cases following vaccination. This strongly suggests that the vaccinations are generating cases.
This is not a simple situation to analyse correctly without a lab and a team. One reason for this is that the vaccines themselves essentially introduce an amount of the genetic sequence being used to test for SARS CoV2 into the person being vaccinated. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that vaccination may cause some people to test positive for COVID19 as a sickness/disease when the test is simply identifying the presence of the virus having been introduced by vaccination but without it posing any risk. However, since we know that people who test positive for the virus can transmit it to others, what may begin as a positive case due to vaccination could then expand into other people being infected by someone who picked up the virus from the vaccine and on and on it goes.
Viral ‘shedding’ is very much a real phenomena following vaccinations and several vaccinations are known to potentially result in others being infected after the vaccination is administered. Some vaccinations come with a warning to stay away from pregnant women for this reason. This archived FDA document shows how the flu virus in an influenza vaccine was known to be spread nasally to unvaccinated people following administration – this is ‘shedding’.
With this in mind, here are some new graphs that were posted to Twitter today by user @OutsideAlan. These graphs show a clearer representation of the relationship between vaccination rates and deaths from COVID19 in numerous countries.
Sri Lanka
A significant spike in deaths proceeds a big spike in vaccinations. The big spike in vaccinations is followed by a spike in deaths almost the same size. It's reasonable to imagine that following a spike in the number of deaths reported/published, that people would agree in large numbers to be vaccinated. The number of deaths following vaccination does indeed seem to closely follow the amount of vaccines administered.
South Africa
Clearly there were large spikes of deaths pre vaccination rollout. The closeness with which the recent spike matches the vaccine rollout may or may not be significant. The data does not discount the idea that vaccinations are driving deaths in the recent spike. Overall, I'd say this data is neutral.
Tunisia
Vaccination rate here follows the increase in deaths, but there is no clearly probable connection to be drawn in terms of causation. Fear of the death could be driving vaccination rate or the connection could be the other way around.
Trinidad & Tobago
The death rate here was very low until the vaccine was introduced and then a giant wave of deaths began. Although we do not know for sure, I might hypothesize from this that perhaps a new variant was introduced via vaccination that was particularly deadly.
Namibia
Mortality here was low until three months into the vaccination rollout where a large peak in death followed a similar peak in vaccinations.
Myanmar
The data here seems a little synthetic and may contain errors, however, it appears to show a large spike of vaccination and then a similar large spike of deaths nearly 3 months later. This could be a coincidence, data error or could be the result of the healthcare system or other factors resulting in newly infected people somehow collectively lasting 3 months.
Seychelles
There are no cases of COVID19 mortality at all until the rollout of the vaccines. Levels of mortality seem to mirror the amount of vaccinations somewhat but mostly occur 4 months later.
Russia
In general it may be reasonable to say that the vaccine rollout correlated to a slight reduction in mortality until June where both vaccination and mortality dramatically increased in concert with each other.
Kazakhstan
The giant spike in mortality may be an error, I am not sure. However, there were generally not many deaths at all - but the numbers certainly increased somewhat during the vaccine rollout.
Malaysia
Hardly any deaths until about 5 weeks after the vaccine rollout, at which time a large increase in deaths was seen.the vaccine rollout closely follows the mortality levels. At some points the deaths are greater than the vaccination and then later the vaccinations move higher than the deaths. The closeness of these lines is significant since after the start of June it is the vaccinations that proceed the deaths.
Indonesia
In general there seems to be little correlation between vaccinations and mortality until early June, when a large increase in vaccinations proceeds a similarly large increase in deaths.
Iran
Numerous high waves of mortality have hit Iran hard prior to vaccination rollout. As with several other regions, initial vaccine rollout seems to coincide with a drop in mortality, but then mortality shoots up a few weeks later as vaccination rates increase dramatically.
Cuba
Mortality was relatively low and steady until 5 weeks after the vaccine rollout, at which time the mortality shot up significantly.
Eswatini
Vaccine rollouts seem to bare little correlation to mortality but the vaccine levels are low.
Fiji
There were no COVID deaths recorded at all until 2 months after the vaccine rollout began. Mortality then spiked in concert with vaccination levels.
Georgia
A large spike in deaths prior to vaccine rollout was followed by vaccine uptake that closely follows mortality until July/August where there has been a sharp increase in vaccination shortly followed by a sharp increased in mortality.
Brazil
In this case, deaths are dropping seemingly in response to vaccine rollouts. This is the first region to display what we might expect to see in a successful vaccination rollout - namely less death following vaccinations.
Botswana
Several of the large vaccination spikes are followed by similar spikes in mortality.
Bahamas
Mortality was spiking both before and during vaccination. I can't really conclude anything meaningful or of interest.
Argentina
The second mass of deaths coincides with vaccine rollouts but not in a way that implies possible causation by the vaccines.
Conclusion
The data here from 20 countries contains a range of observations - ranging from alarming to not alarming at all. In a minority of cases mortality was either positively affected (improved) following vaccination. However, in many cases there are clear increases in mortality following vaccine rollouts. In more than one case there was zero or almost zero COVID19 mortality before vaccines were rolled out!
One thing to note is that many regions exhibit a sharp increase in mortality in July and August, this may be due to normal seasonal virus patterns however.
I strongly urge all who have the means to pay attention to this situation, ask questions and prompt for more thorough analysis and research into this topic.
The absolute truth will emerge eventually, whatever it may be!
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Read My User Guide for Hive Here
You Can Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!
Click the big black button below:
View My Witness Application Here
View Some of My Witness Related Posts
Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as PeakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!
https://twitter.com/ura_soul1/status/1426508839134715910
https://twitter.com/campbeln/status/1426668217280253955
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
LOL. You somehow still believe the official data is correct? Proven liars are going to tell the truth one day?
It's clear, those vaccines are highly poisonous, worse than crack cocaine and that's one of the reasons people are dying. But we knew this would happen last year.
Source: UK Government Astrazeneca vaccine injury report and deathlist.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1010799/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print_DLP_04.08.2021.pdf
I aim to not believe anything at all.
Perfect me too. So we know from the death and injury list that those vaccines are highly toxic and it has begone.
We warned a lot of people in time last year and are entering a new phase of this shitty Great Reset.
Goodluck to us all.
I did my best for about 15 years to warn about this tech - yes, few listened. I don't think the truth about this can be truly hidden long term.
Lol, its been hidden since 1910 by the exact same group. Make no mistake, this is chemical genocide, our hospitals are deathcamps and every doctor is a genocidalist.
Auschwitz in a needle or Auschwitz in a tablet.
And yes, they are coming for our kids.
P.s. Thanks by the way for Americas Frontline Doctors Historical speech by the way. Shared that link a lot because you uploaded it. 🙏
New World Freedom. 🤠
You are welcome. The New World Aura will eventually hold firm.
The thing I'm thinking is, when you're developing a "leaky" vaccine, at what point does it become known that it is, in fact, leaky? If a pandemic is rolling unchecked, as it was before these were developed, some may say in haste, other may say not fast enough. At what point do you decide its in the best interests to stop a "leaky" vaccine if there are no other options, or should it even be stopped? Ultimately there is no guarantees and there are lots of variables that are farther reaching than some isolated birds, when you're talking about the entire planet. I am not saying I am behind the vaccine or against it, I just am not easily assured of any claims, when they are based on limited or minimal data. I certainly am not the type of person to give any government cart blanche regarding the public's anything. But health is generally a thing that every human, regardless of position, has as a common goal, as noone wants poor decisions made resulting in deaths of anyone that could eventually make its way back to them or their families. Pandemics, thankfully aren't a norm, even now, with regards to the stream of time ratio to qualified pandemics. Not to mention, they government relies heavily in such cases on opinions of the health system, and doctors who for the most part again, have a similar goal in seeking solutions to health risks or dangers. So, not to be ignorant or naive, but rather simply trying to be realistic, with awareness to the possibility of imperfection of person and imperfection of moral fiber, also being a playing factor and unknown but known variable. I think its a little early to even begin developing an accurate opinion myself, but that's just my two cents trying to make sense of all the senseless nonsense.
Edit: Just adding that it didn't leave any feeling of certainty of the articles aim when reading your last comment regarding the "New World Aura", as I have not heard of that, but clearly through the response you were making to, it seems at least somewhat known. What I mean is, what effect on your research and/or decision making regarding opinions as they relate to current Governments, does your belief system have on those opinions? Personally I prefer opinions that are lacking influence from any personal belief system, since that tends to imply a possibility of an agenda or ulterior motive that is coming from a perspective that has no relation to the material as it is somewhat presented with an influential impetus due perspective, rather than fact based and a searching for truth at all costs based on the general wellfare of all.
I aim to hold zero beliefs on any topic - I may have some but when I find them I let them go. This leaves me free to hold only knowledge, emotions and thoughts. The absence of belief allows me to adjust thoughts freely while fully feeling - unhindered by unreasonable attachment. Emotional processing allows the emotions to move freely enough to avoid the emotional equivalent of bias introduced by beliefs.
I am currently reviewing a peer reviewed paper that was just published on the topic of vaccines making (human) people sick - I will post on it when I can.
Vaccines are leaky when they do not prevent transmission. The majority of older vaccines for humans do prevent transmission, but the COVID ones don't. Leaky vaccines give a false sense of security, but more than that, they provide a breeding ground in hosts for more lethal forms of viruses. When rules are being inserted into society to limit the freedom of those who are unvaccinated, even when the vaccinated are just as likely to pass on pathogens as unvaccinated - then we have a major ethical problem (to add to the many that exist just by the action of trying to limit the freedom of someone else based on your own thinking). With unvaccinated people actually being blamed for driving transmission, it is only right to highlight that there are several pathways involved which actually mean that it is the vaccinated who may be driving transmission and that if we are going to be controlling one group more than the other, it might be best to restrict the freedoms of the vaccinated more than the unvaccinated. We don't know the long term outcome from this experiment and we wouldn't usually allow such a situation.
But why do you feel belief equates or begets bias? The definitions of belief and bias, are not similar in remotely such a way as I'm understanding from your comment.
For one "beliefs" are primarily defined in the dictionary as:
and secondary as "belief in" as:
In these regards, I would think your aim as stated could never succeed, as it is impossible for one to have the opinion that - not any statement is true or that not anything exists, related or otherwise. Simply holding yourself to be a person, and having your own set of goals or standards, (aside from that in itself being a belief structure of its own) believing in yourself or your goals, is in fact acceptance that you are real, and exist, and believe and have conviction in your opinions and goals. So to exist aside from beliefs, of many or any kinds or kind, would make existence as such, impossible.
However if I assume you mean beliefs as they are defined in the secondary definition, more so "belief in" or a "set of beliefs" with a religious connotation.
Still the definition of "bias" doesn't really help your seeming comparative implication.
"Bias" in the noun tense is found as:
And the verb tense to "be biased":
So if bias is in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another in an unfair manner, religious bias doesn't fall under this definition as being in favor one against another is not explicit, and the unfair manner is not uniform as per the content of the religions of the world, regardless of the many unfavorable aspects of many religions, favorable aspects as well exist, but not uniformly in any regards. It would almost appear as though your viewpoint would be one of "bias" itself in promoting it as a standard in the way in which you do.
Also, "bias" comes in many forms, some of which aren't of a poor connotation, so certainly holding it as a form of equation to or with "beliefs" both general and specific, is not only ill conceived, but judgemental in form and function thereby far from unhindered or unreasonable in attachment to either.
Besides, who maintained that attachment, both reasonable and unreasonable, was a less than ideal quality in any light. Because love itself can at times seem reasonable and unreasonable, and due to differing perspectives of all individuals, both belief or bias can be seen in both conditions, without or even with regard to the right or wrong of it.
I upvoted you, thank you for posting! 👍
What is blowing my mind, well not really, is that googling(via duck duck go🙄) for the first reported case of covid-19 and nothing. It is funny more than anything, as I was going reference how the first patient's lung fluid was used as a base to create these vaccines ALLEGEDLY. The science used an Ai and algorithms to piece in the missing DNA pieces that would best resemble a coronavirus and then created a vaccine all from a computer.
Arguably what ever they are presenting is suggesting that this vaccine is based off a mutated strain not the novel one. Just none of their information matches up except for the results that they had in the Gain of Function research trials with the vaccines they created for their spike proteins that were inserted into lab mice. Of course this GoF research was conducted in USA and China funded by both countries out in the open.
Now, they question if covid-19 was around actually for really 6 months to 12 months before dec 2019, despite evidence GofF was in full swing under Obombya. I watched my good friend die of every single one of the convid symptoms. Even on ventilation the while time. First it was pneumonia and then they said there's no way ammonia was destroying his lungs like this. The doctors really had no answer other than sometimes cancer takes a mind of its own it could go from stage one to stage four over night etc etc blah blah blah blah blah.
What I saw happened to him in one month was exactly what happened in the GoF research trials with the lab rats. Lungs were destroyed rapidly beyond repair. That was December of 2018. Another friend had a similar thing happen in April of 2020. He survived. Both had cancers and was highly vulnerable to the genetically modified spike proteins. Just my opinion.
You might be having difficulty finding that info because the Chinese wiped a lot of studies and info a few months ago once the finger was pointing at them as the source of an engineered virus.
I think maybe you missed my post about the patent origins of SARS CoV2 - the 'novel' aspects of the virus appear to be all recorded in patents prior to 2019: https://peakd.com/hive-196427/@ura-soul/skzdvtjn
There's another topic in the background that I will cover soon regarding the validity of virology as an entire field, which includes a lot of focus on the process of isolating alleged viruses and how flawed the process is. It is quite surprising how much of that process is actually just computer simulations!
...and is blindly accepted by the masses.
How a sane logical person is still standing through all of this is beyond me. You are relentless! life has become a giant meme and it is out of control. thanks for keeping your wits about ya
I find it interesting that the vaccines are experimental yet they don't seem to at all be concerned about finding out which one works the best out of all of them and promoting that one. They treat them all like they are equally valid and needed.
That is a strange "experiment". Many experiments, all treated as successful, with no clear winners or losers.
I think Astra Zeneca has fallen into disfavor but that is about the only one.
Likewise masks... Right now it doesn't matter what type of mask you wear as long as you wear one. You could get around with toilet paper held onto your head with rubber bands.
I've seen crocheted masks worn by celebrities...
Frequently some "authority figure" pushes a new mandate and it is almost immediately found violating it.
The first part of science is usually observation. The above are some of my observations. I could then pose a hypothesis which I am not going to do here.
I think those observations don't fit with a lot of the stated narrative...
The mask situation is clearly theatre. Aerosol sized particles easily pass through all but the most sealed of mask designs - easily meaning that the majority in use are basically useless. Additionally, they store up our metabolic wastes and toxins so that we keep breathing them in.. In general, they are ridiculous. 'Officials' even publicly stated early on that they were only in use to try to minimise people's anxiety and to give them a sense of empowerment, that they could do something to protect themselves. Many studies show they are useless.
The debate about stupidity vs malevolence is as relevance as ever! I can hypothesise either way.
I've come to like the idea of spraying a little aerosol fragrance like strawberry or peppermint and asking "What does that smell like?" When they answer I say "If you can smell that then that mask won't do anything to stop a virus as small as COVID".
Haha... Truth.. une parfum by Winblood. :)
Covid19 has also been politicised in some African countries. Manipulating number of affected person's for their own gain(embessement of funds). Your post have she'd more light on what is going on. There are lots of controversial arguments regarding the effectiveness of covid19 vaccine. It's turning the world into a mess
Check out this post about vaccine history in Africa to see how bad it can get.. Remain vigilant!
This is true. My ears have been wide open, waiting for a public declaration that the vaccines are perfect and if taken, people will not contact the disease, but none.
I personally feel that the vaccines are still under the testing stage.
They are being tested, the trials officially end in 2023 - but the problem is that the trials are extending into the wider public. The vaccines have been rolled out without proper safety testing to millions of people. Policies are being enacted as if the vaccine is totally safe when that is just scientifically untrue. Employers who try to force people to receive this shot are acting extremely unethically, probably criminally and we should all monitor them and remember who they are for future reference.
I know a couple of people who have taken the vaccine. It all seems so wrong
Although I have got my first vaccination dose 2 months back and planning for the next one in the next month, I still don't have much faith in the vaccine because In India we have heard of severe cases post 2 doses of the vaccination. It could be person to person and not applicable to all but there is a great chance that the vaccine might show some bad after effect. God knows what will happen but there's not much of an option we have right now.
Airports are denying entry to people without vaccination and there are prohibitions starting at other places too for non-vaccinated people.
I appreciate that the situation is difficult. Governments only have the power of the public to use. They are using your own power. When the people stand up for themselves, the government has to back down.
Iceland has a 90% vaccinated population, but now has the largest outbreak to date in the country. This provides a good case study for the relevancy of the statement "the vaccines are driving the creation of the variants".
https://www.icelandreview.com/society/covid-19-in-iceland-vaccination-has-not-led-to-herd-immunity-says-chief-epidemiologist/
Absolutely, yes, I included Iceland in my first post on this topic a couple of weeks ago. It looks like around 90 nations show data where cases/deaths shoot up after vaccine rollout.