RE: Science Shows COVID19 Vaccines May Increase Transmission & Drive Variants. Cases Often Increase After Vaccine Drives.
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
While it is important what we take the vaccine, it is also mandatory that we still take all the the social distancing measures and keep the double mask on.
It is true that as more and more population is vaccinated, the number of cases will spike. Reason is simple. Those who are vaccinated will feel free to step out without fear. Even if they won't get badly affected by the virus (due to vaccination), they can still be carriers. And they will then easily transmit the virus to those who are not yet vaccinated.
So ideally, we should enforce the covid safety protocols until the entire population gets vaccinated, which I understand would take a lot of time but what's more important than a healthy life.
I think you are denying the actual details of what the science is saying here. The study that was quoted here is pointing to the vaccinations, being essentially faulty and badly designed, are powering stronger variants that the vaccines may not protect against. So not only is vaccination driving transmission into people who would otherwise be healthy, but they are potentially pushing the virus into states that will kill those who are vaccinated too. 100% coverage of a fault vaccine is not better than a lower percentage. Think please.
Did you mean, "Think please," or, "Think like me, please"?
I meant 'think please', since from my standpoint there is an absence of thinking taking place and an overt level of repetition without thinking taking place.
But it's clear their response was a form of thought, correct?
holding thoughtforms (noun) and repeating them is not evidence of active thinking as a verb.
How many times did that individual say that to you?
The repetition is not in the number of times spoken in this thread, but in the absence of consideration of the content of the post and any counter narrative evidence. The repetition is of the narrative being spun constantly through mainstream media and government sources. There is a reason why mind control functions through constant repetition and a reason why those under it's spell will tend to just blindly repeat and not question.
You've said repetition (repeating, repeat) six times. Should I be concerned? Are you attempting to control my mind by repeating your repetition narrative? Is what you're saying what you'd prefer I believe? Do you take this same position often? What makes you think humans are "largely unconscious?" Are those who fully agree with you, awake? Are you awake? If so, can you explain what being awake feels like?
I am talking about the kid of repetition that involves silicon valley censoring dissenting doctors and researchers in order to facilitate a constant stream of curated language that all points in the same direction. Sign posts and guilting all around, trying to overcome any 'resistance' or in other words 'free thinking'. If you think me using a word several times in a short conversation is a challenge to your ability to think freely, then wait til you participate in wider society!
I don't prefer anyone to believe anything, I advocate for total cessation of belief - since beliefs are mere guesswork taken as the truth.
My study of the nature of consciousness over a very long time and engagement in the process of making the unconscious conscious have shown me a great deal. It is the consensus of scientists who study humanity that most of most people is unconscious, this is not really debated. Most people won't be able to recall last week unless they are triggered to do so - this is an example of extreme unconsciousness. Consciousness notices, while unconsciousness denies and fails to recall or process.
Agreeing with me is not proof of being more awake and aware than the average human. Being open to all sides of a situation and being willing to explore and comment on them is one way to demonstrate a receptive level of consciousness. Being able to communicate with balance, coherence and compassion demonstrates a heart centered level of consciousness. Even these are only introductory levels of above average awareness - yet they are disturbingly rare at this point.
I am more awake than I was empowered to be through school and by society. How much further I can go is unclear, but probably quite a bit further.
greater consciousness includes an increased capacity and requirement for processing information and an associated increased level of cognition in general. this enables new levels of understanding to be reached, enables decisions to be made that improve wellbeing, creativity and so on. how it feels may change moment to moment since it includes greater sensitivity to reality and reality itself is in flux. in general, consistent emotional processing increases awareness and with right thinking and decisions making we will tend to feel happier and healthier as a result. in my own experience, greater awareness invokes a combination of joy and concern for different reasons.
Good. Now explain your reasoning to the one you insulted.
Have a nice day.
if you think being nudged to question more is insulting, wait till you speak to the people trying to force others to be injected against their will.. all empowered by others not doing due dilligence research.
Watch how far you'll get with that research insulting those you're trying to help. Think, please.
I have absolutely no problem being prompted to think as it infers I have missed something. I welcome being shown what I have missed as I seek to learn and reach truth.
Okay, I speak Canadian though. So, if some asshole comes up to you and says, "What's up, brainwashed moron, would you like some information that could save your life since you can't think for yourself and you're on autopilot?"
How far you going to get?
Listen. I can see you're trying to take the high road, but it's not doing a good enough job of masking the low blow. You can continue on arguing, or admit you're being an asshole, then go on your own, think, find the truth, and solve your problems.
I have a problem with people who act like you in this world now. Posing as the saviors of humanity while treating those who don't follow your 'lead' like idiots who can't think for themselves. You read an article and formed an opinion. That's all. Read this. Wipe that chip off your shoulder.
So you got upset that your dad wouldn't listen to your health advice, but then someone who has possibly been in the same position as you - being rejected for offering health advice - is a scumbag because he smiled? I appreciate that it's unloving and possibly evil to take seeming pleasure in someone else's suffering. At the same time, when a person tries to warn many people about the real risks and is ridiculed by people who have done no research - leading us to a point of medical tyranny, I can understand why their heart and mind turns against those who ridicule them.
We need receptivity, heart centered awareness and willingness to empathise and consider all points. For me personally, sat on the other side of the world from my home - here to help someone who was a victim of serious crime due to the madness driven into people's minds during the lockdown - emptying my savings to do so.. All on the basis of extremely flawed thinking and 'science' - that I have been studying for many years.. I know 100% that telling someone to think is neither a low blow nor something that needs apologising for.
You missed the point entirely. "Being rejected for offering health advice." You think that guy was offering my dad health advice at some point? He cuts grass for a living. You're twisted, dude. On cloud nine. Hellbent on making yourself look good, after doing something stupid.
I am only able to relate to someone laughing at someone having a bloodclot after a vaccine in the sense that they have already tried to warn people about the vaccines and gotten rejected/ridiculed - I don't know of any other reason why they would be smiling in that context. If someone gets some kind of enjoyment out of someone else's suffering for no reason other than that they read online that this kind of thing can happen, then they are perhaps psychopathic.
I'm not going to continue this conversation as it is not a productive use of anyone's time. Wishing you well.
The vaccine didn't give him the blood clot. The guy just thinks that because he's been glued to his phone, lapping up the lopsided viewpoint, and wanting, hoping, they're right. Brainwashed to associate blood clots with vaccines. My dad hurt his leg. That damage led to a blood clot. But the media junkie doesn't understand, to the point of smiling and saying "I told you so." Even you yourself associate the blood clot with the vaccine. I didn't say that's what caused it. I left out the cause, to help prove point. That guy is convinced it's poison, it can't be removed, and he's smiling about it, because that made him feel, right.
That's the part you don't understand. You're not thinking about others. The goal of a post like this is to impress those who want to hear it framed this way. Anyone else with an opposing viewpoint, you slammed. Yet if you were truly trying to help, those are the people you need to be reaching. Clearly, that's not your goal. You can deny it all you want but I see what I see, because it's right in front of me.
Like I said, you missed the point, entirely.
That's right. You've wasted my time.