Global warming: Forget the old lines you were taught at school.

avatar

Since elementary school, we are taught that the earth's average temperature has increased over the years, due to the action of men on nature, emitting polluting gases better known by the acronym CO2, and that this increase is being caused by the greenhouse effect that is expanding over the years, causing the melting of glaciers and consequently the rise in sea level, thus causing a global climate maladjustment. If you look at it, the era of industrialization had its beginnings in the 18th century and continues to the present day. If we carefully analyze the fallacies that we are obliged to accept in this indoctrination existing in our collegiate disciplinary process, we will say that natural disasters, such as: storms, droughts, extreme heat, excessive rain, occurred from the beginning of the polluting era, only no, we know very well that since the beginning of our planet, there are constant changes in climate, reversal of magnetic poles, magnetic anomalies, once the earth was frozen, once it was totally flooded, and later it will perish in extreme heat, which I'm going to mention what might happen to get to that critical point.

image.png
image

One thing is certain, the emission of polluting gases harms a class mainly, ourselves, the respiratory tract is the affected region, as well as cigarettes, we are taught that it is bad for health because of the components it is composed of, not to mention the smoke itself is harmful. The gases released into the atmosphere interfere in the way of life of people around, but it cannot be said that these pollutants are the main cause of climate change, because there have always been natural disasters caused by the action of nature, regardless of the evolution of the industrial technological process of humanity. The USA is an example of how the action of nature has constantly punished certain regions. There is a certain period of the year that hurricanes form in the Atlantic Ocean, and sometimes pass through the American coast, leaving trails of destruction in several cases. Another phenomenon that occurs annually is tornadoes, these q form on land, near regions where there is a collision of temperatures (hot ground, with the cold of the mountains), causing massive destruction depending on the degree of intensity. In Brazil, even though it is "free" from earthquakes because it is located far from tectonic plates, there are incidences of small tornadoes and, in the past, some hurricane forms in the coastal region, more specifically in the state of Santa Catarina, and it is the place where there are also larger flood incidences, an observation: The most polluting state in Brazil is Pará (Amazon region), followed by Mato Grosso (south of the Amazon region) . For the record, these states are not the hottest in Brazil, the hottest places are located in semi-arid and low-polluting regions. What does that mean? This means that the occurrence of these natural phenomena are specific to different places, without human interference, at least in the industrial aspect.

image.png
image

We can conclude that the statement that climate change has been caused by human action has been used more as a political, economic discourse and to impose the population reduction agenda that is the goal of the global elite (decrease the number of industries= less products = less consumption = population decrease = easier to dominate the population mass)... Will there come a time when planet earth will increase in temperature considerably? Yes, yes, there is mention in the bible of Christianity about the fact (the earth will be destroyed by fire). And this increase has nothing to do with the pollution of industries, burning, cattle droppings, but the earth will shorten the distance between it and the sun. The sun will expand or even increase the incidence of solar flares, emitting solar radiation, which consequently will gradually destroy the earth's protective layers, thus increasing ultraviolet rays and the earth's temperature. Bill Gates say so, if I'm wrong in this article, he and his ideals would not be funding studies for the manufacture of products that would soften the solar temperature, with the aim of causing 'less' heat/solar radiation to our planet.

image.png
image

image.png
image


Posted via proofofbrain.io



0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar

I understand perfectly the point you are trying to make, but in order to make this point you have to examine more thoroughly what the scientists say about climate change. They say that the gases we emit destroys some layers protecting the earth like the ozone layer, you are supposed to examine whether this is true, because if it is true then it means the actions of man are destroying some of the Earth's natural protection and thus the protection from the sun's radiation is getting weaker which would result in more heat. You understand what I'm saying?

Also, what you said about some high polluting areas in Brazil not being the hottest is not really a good point because scientists say that winds carry the gasses we emit and might blow them further away from where they were emitted.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are different points of view. If you look at it, scientists are looking for an answer to global warming, and the ozone layer over Antarctica is where the biggest hole is, right? If so, it should be warmer there, because the incidence of ultraviolet rays would be being emitted with greater frequency and second, why would the winds be pushing all these gases in greater volume to that frozen continent specifically? To me these are just anomalies, just as there is an anomaly that covers part of South America, called the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly, which is expanding to other borders. I believe that our civilization has an exact survival time on Earth... and planet Earth undergoes changes every time for thousands of years, in which entire civilizations die out and new ones appear... it's a kind of crazy thought, but I believe that advanced civilizations existed in the remote past on our planet and that they disappeared from the map by these changes in the Earth's climate and by major catastrophes. But in short, I liked your review. I think a little differently, this doesn't mean that I don't believe in parts of the work of scientists, but I think that not everything is the fault of human action, but of the natural transformation process of planets and stars...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @lookagain! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You made more than 10 comments.
Your next target is to reach 50 comments.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

0
0
0.000