I could wait no more: Vaccines, Isolates, Mandates, oh my.... Huge news as far as I am concerned.

avatar
(Edited)

I encountered a lot of news yesterday that had me chomping at the proverbial bit. I just wanted it to be shared here. I reached out to @active-truth to see if she wanted to run with it as it'd give her a chance to put some "I told you so" messaging out there. I haven't heard from her yet and I can't resist any longer. I must write something because it is building up behind the dam and it the dam breaks it'll be chaos. As is it is enough information that it is going to be my attempt at wrestling this into some sort of stream of consciousness sharing... If you will, wish me luck. If you're reading this and make it to the end you'll be able to tell if I actually was lucky or not.

Where is it?

There have been plenty of people stating that SARS-COV-2 doesn't exist and that it is made up.

Myself and others have countered with...

"I had it. The symptoms and timing match."

In my case I had it before they tested for it. I will now qualify and say I had something. When I say I don't need a vaccine because I already had it and survived giving me natural immunity people will note that I say "I think I had it because the symptoms match". They will then ask me why I don't get tested to find out. Well I actually researched the RT-PCR tests quite extensively and even listened to the person that developed them. I know that they don't prove much of anything and depending upon the cycles used they can generate massive amounts of false positives.

They will often then push back saying... "but you are uncertain" to which I state that I am not 100% certain but I am certain enough in the probability of things that I am not worried about it. I then also explain that I had been carefully tracking the morbidity (what percentage of people it kills) of COVID since before the CDC or WHO were even talking about it. I was watching it emerge in other countries because I actively try to pay attention to things going on around the world using my own time and effort.

Those numbers dropped lower and lower as we became more familiar with the situation. They in fact dropped so low that anyone that knows anything about flu seasons and such would be asking "we locked down for this?" not to mention we are still locked down. The morbidity rates are substantially lower than a bad flu season at this point. @rok-sivante has a post that breaks some of these figures down in one perspective.

I have for some time been the guy that reads the inserts to vaccines. When I see numbers like "1 in 100,000 experience side effect A" that translates to a percentage for me. I also consider what impact side effect A would have on my life. Is it temporary, or is it permanent? If it is temporary what is the likelihood of it changing into something life threatening?

When the percentages and side effects are higher danger to me from the vaccine than the illness then I'll take the illness every time.

This is true of COVID and the vaccines related to it.

See the post from @rok-sivante above for comparison...

Yes, but where is it?

You see my assumption and the assumption of people that make the counter that I did is that we had COVID.

Yet flu cases have all but disappeared. In my case other people in my house were tested for influenza and pneumonia when whatever it was went through our house (before CDC was talking about it... around New Years 2020) and those tests came back negative. Assuming the tests were correct.

Yet there are other coronaviruses. There may even be this one. There are also other illnesses that can cause similar symptoms.

It is very possible many of us that say "It is real, I had it" had one of these illnesses. How can we know?

The answer could be "They tested and told me that was it."

We may also hear "It is real, I know people that died from it." Yet again how do you know they died from it? The doctors told you.

Normally that would be acceptable but there is a major problem with this. It is a problem many people are talking about.

The truth...

They have NEVER isolated SARS-COV-2. They supplied biological testing taken from multiple subjects and combined together that as many elements that would have nothing to do with such a virus. As such they are not an ISOLATE by any normal year, or normal scientific testing standards. Any tests run against those samples selected can key off of many unrelated things.

Furthermore they are using the RT-PCR test (which CDC only recently declared will cease to be used as of DECEMBER) which is being used at cycles from 35-45 in many places. With cycles this high you can potentially find any substance on anything. This might explain why a President in an African nation (apologies I don't remember which one) submitted animals, papaya (a fruit), and other things which came back positive for COVID.

The test also cannot identify any VARIANTS. Not only that it can't differentiate between COVID, the FLU, or other coronaviruses (which we used to call the common cold).

If they haven't isolated COVID how can they tell you about all of these variants? Realistically, they can't.

The Believer becomes the Nonbeliever...

Yesterday Mike Adams (aka The Health Ranger) who runs a scientific laboratory testing facility, as well as many websites including naturalnews.com, chemicalviolence.com, and brighteon.com came out apologizing to all the people that stated it didn't exist. He was absolutely certain that it did.

He has changed his mind due to the evidence, or should I say lack of evidence that is coming out.

It was his very thorough article that I read yesterday that I thought seriously needed to be posted about. I told @active-truth about it and was waiting to see if she responded. This post is worth the read. It is the inspiration for my jumble of words here... well at least one of the inspirations.

image.png
Link - Well worth reading. It addresses details I am not going to go into here.

image.png

Yet this was not the only article... they have come like a flood and I am going to go ahead and put all of them that caught my attention here before I continue my word journey.

image.png
Link

image.png
Link - Who knew you'd have to FORCE Doctors and Healthcare "Experts" into giving a vaccine that is "good for you."

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link | Another link from different source

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
The Epoch Times - Premium Link


So what?

Really, is that all you have from all of that? So what?

  • They haven't isolated the virus. Thus, they do not have an accurate sample to test against.
  • If they haven't isolated the original virus how can they be telling us about variants?
  • The RT-PCR test has been admitted as flawed and the CDC themselves recommend discontinuing it's use. Yet this is the same test they also told testers to lower the CT to 25 only for vaccinated people which would make the positives for COVID appear to be lower for vaccinated people due to people that were not vaccinated being tested at significantly higher cycle rates. (I shared a document with the CDC PDF for this last month or the month before.)
  • The test cannot differentiate between COVID and INFLUENZA. It also cannot tell you how much of the virus you have. It is a simple YES/NO test.
  • Flu which traditionally kills people all over the world every year has been magically eradicated in some places. Perhaps it is simply the fact that many people with the flu are being classified as COVID? Which seems more likely?
  • There are some reports that a Flu shot helps with COVID. Hmmm... could it be because it was the flu and not COVID in those cases?
  • They don't care what type of mask you wear as long as you wear one. That is an indication it is a test of your obedience more than something that actually has a medical purpose. Add in the fact the people mandating the masks are frequently (way too often these days) getting caught violating their own mandates right after they are issued.
  • They choose for political reasons when to classify a crowd of unmasked people as a "super spreader" event and when not to.
  • They are recommending booster shots of the vaccine when the vaccine is not working.
  • Outbreaks of the "variant" or so they claim are higher in highly vaccinated regions.
  • Unvaccinated children have become infected by their vaccinated parents.
  • Looking at the numbers COVID is less dangerous on a percentage basis than the vaccines.
  • The morbidity of COVID is around that of a flu season. It is just getting A LOT of attention. Perhaps it is around the morbidity of flu because most of the cases of death potentially ARE the flu.
  • You had it? How do you know? They didn't isolate it. How do you know it wasn't the flu, or something else?
  • Some medical experts have stated they think each push for vaccination potentially sets the possibility of achieving herd immunity back by as much as 6 months. Many of them think this would have all been over a long time ago (in a positive way) had we simply not locked down and handled this like we do any other year with a heavy flu season.
  • Do you think the German people looked into a mirror and thought they were bad and evil people because their rulers had convinced them it was all at the fault of the Jews? That process is called dehumanization. It is what our "rulers" are using propaganda to turn the unvaccinated into. Take their rights away, put them in prison camps, don't let them go to restaurants, don't let them shop, etc... the steady fall towards concentration camps, and executions. If you agree with this when you look into the mirror do you see the Nazi SS uniform that you are wearing? Guess what neither did most of the German people. You also can't hide forever behind "I'm doing what I was told", or "It is my job".
  • FINALLY: A simple dichotomy and it is not false. If the vaccine works then there is no need for a vaccine passport. If the vaccine does not work then there is no need for a vaccine passport. If it works then no one is going to infect you with COVID. If it doesn't work then there is no reason to take it and thus no need for a passport.

There is so much more to this. There is a huge amount of lying going on. Those behind it are weaponizing the people that blindly trust them into going after and attacking those who spread "misinformation" while practicing what I typically refer to as PROPAGANDA 102: "Accuse your enemy of that which you are guilty".

The mirror never lies. Sometimes we just refuse to acknowledge what it reflects.

EDIT:

If you have been paying attention to my articles... I often update them after the original post. I will be doing that here.

image.png
Link

The countries listed as very high travel risk include Malta, United Arab Emirates, Seychelles, Chile, Uruguay, Bahrain, Mongolia

The countries list as high travel risk include Iceland, Qatar, Belgium, Canada, Israel

image.png

If you must travel to Seychelles, make sure you are fully vaccinated before travel.

Seychelles is perhaps the MOST vaccinated place on the planet. Apparently the vaccine is not helping. In fact they are in terrible shape. Yet the CDC is advising people to make certain they are fully vaccinated before traveling there.

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

NOTE: The article at the bottom is from May 13th!!! Then look at the chart above from another website showing the increase (huge surge) in cases and death. They seem to correspond with AFTER vaccination.


Why possibly could they be pushing this vaccine so hard EVEN for those that survived and should have natural immunity which is better than that conferred by any vaccine?

Some have theorized the following reason:

.jpg
The Georgia Guidestones


image.png
Link

Yet somehow we think it is okay for them to vote????

image.png
Link

image.png
Link - Given what it is beginning to look like this may be an incredibly effective way to destroy our military.

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

image.png
Link

Three words seem to describe almost ALL of these things...

Dehumanization

Fascism

Totalitarianism



0
0
0.000
48 comments
avatar
0
0
0.000
avatar

There are reports. Yet via FOIA request they cannot actually be provided when requested.

The top link I shared below the first image goes into detail on how they provide the isolate that they do provide to the labs.

Keep in mind Mike Adams has been arguing against people making the claim about it not being "isolated" up until this point. He was also one of those talking about the virus that would be named COVID for a couple of months before the CDC or WHO said anything about it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh... and the problem is that isn't how you are supposed to isolate such things. :) You get a lot of additional biological material when you approach it that way. They have also supposedly done this from Bovine subjects as well in some cases.

This information was in that first article.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A "Variant of Concern"...do they mean Loki?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Heh... pick a name. :) That one sounds as good as any.

They might need one in a day, a week, or month.

By the way I referenced in a post a few days ago the CDCs own guidelines indicating the tests couldn't differentiate between variants and to do so they have to be sent to a special lab which they indicated they will only be doing for surveillance purposes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"Papers please", no longer a metaphor for a Nazi style police state, but one for a Democratic Police State. No doubt a new department will be formed, money pit for the American tax payers, and will will be named the Department of Passport Security, just so everyone can see we are a DPS-type of country.

0
0
0.000
avatar

For me, one saying is that the vaccine is not 100% safe, as it has not undergone sufficient trials to be tested
Yes, no side effects have appeared so far, but in the long term !!
In the end, natural immunity is the best thing


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Curious...why is natural immunity the best thing? For many other virus based illnesses this is not true at all, for example chicken pox, which has had one of the most impactful vaccination campaigns over the past 20 years, also prevents shingles which is essentially the same as your "long term side effect" fear from the COVID-19 vaccine. What about the potential for long term side effects of the virus? Those have been quite prevalent with people I know who have had the infection.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Chickenpox may be the only exception though people have actually gotten shingles that have been vaccinated as well.

In addition, @cristina-zac is incorrect. A ton of negative side effects have showed up for the COVID vaccines... massive amounts actually. Most of them around blood clotting and that is occurring with all of them not just the Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson ones.

Though the CDC presentations themselves have shown a laundry list of side effects that can occur.

Many of them having permanent impact on your life.

Ultimately it should be your decision and ONLY your decision on whether you take a vaccine but you should be as informed as possible.

Take a look at the VAERS database and you'll see a lot of side effects. Death being the worst but far from the only one.

Take a look at the post I referenced from @rok-sivante in this post. I linked to his post that shows the stats. The vaccines are actually more dangerous than the virus itself.

It should be obvious when you consider some of the places that are having the most problems now are places where they claim ALL the population was vaccinated such as the Seycheles. Yet you and I know they likely didn't get everyone.

There are surges happening all over the place in heavily vaccinated areas.

The data they pull to talk about unvaccinated per the CDC's own announcement is based upon data pulled from January to June. Most of the population was NOT vaccinated at that time and they were using the RT-PCR test which they have indicated they will not use as of December and it is known for giving a ton of false positives.

Recent data seems to be reporting most cases of people sick to a large degree are the vaccinated.

Though as I pointed out unvaccinated children have been getting it from vaccinated parents.

Also prior to vaccination almost no children died from COVID and those that did had other comorbidities. Since vaccination quite a few vaccinated children have died.

0
0
0.000
avatar

When they need to have those stats, they tell that even flu is covid. When you tell them that I'm sure I had flu what means covid, they ask you if you are sure about that. It's a clear manipulation and I don't think pushing for this vaccine is about health. Just like @shepz1 wrote here : It is all about health, it's not at all about health. It's about control and to train people to obey. So, when they ask people to put some chip on their head, they mostly will do it easily. They are already thinking about that. It was announced that they are working now on bio-chips to know if someone has covid or not. That's in Russia, I don't know about other countries, but I'm sure they have such technology for sure !


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi, I apologize for the length of my comment but hope, you'll take the time to read it.

If I asked you to think more deeply about the contagion or virus theory and consider that it might be a false theory, what is your resistance to it?

The Max Planck Institute in Germany, which is considered to be renowned, has written a long scientific paper on the history of the virus theory, in which it concludes that the virus theory could not be proven unequivocally.

In another paper I read that Koch's postulates could not even be fulfilled by Koch himself, to which the scientific world itself refers, but which does not seem to be followed in detail. There is always talk of the one, first step, the "isolation of a virus", but the other steps are generally unknown or little known. One of Koch's opponents at the time is known to have drunk a glass of tuberculosis pathogens without anything of note happening to prove Koch wrong.

In this post of mine, I have enumerated the steps.

Following what is known about Koch's postulates:

I have a sick person from which I take a secretion
I take a healthy person
To this healthy person I inject something sick from the first person
The healthy person then becomes ill
I take the secretion from the sick person and give it to another healthy person who also becomes sick.
Then I have fulfilled the postulates.

What does that tell us? Was this ever done in this recent event? What if one would run numerous and massive experiments leaning on those postulates? What would be the outcome? (Which I would not want to do, but what can be thought about it?)

How is our own perception of contagion affected at all?

Personally, I can say from my memory that whenever I had flu myself, it was not per se that my husband or son also got sick immediately afterwards. Although we were in close contact and neither shied away from hugs nor practised special hygiene.

What I can say, however, is that wintertime is the time when people were more likely to have a cold or flu. I do not necessarily attribute this to contagion, but to the fact that in the seasonal cycle of human biology, the climate, sunlight and the absorption of substances seem to be metabolised differently in winter than in summer. If we just consider that everyone gets sick at certain times and that this has to do not only with diet, exercise and the seasonal climate, but also with a person's mentality, how much or little mental and/or physical stress he or she has, then the monocausal argument of viral contagion does not seem very convincing to me.

Secondly, I do not believe in something like immunity or herd immunity. If I believe in it, I inevitably cannot get out of the act and would have to assume that only the human inability to produce medicine prevents immunity, where in principle this possibility exists and is just not yet mature enough. This is a typical argument of those who think that we are able to influence our biological processes in such a way that we can exercise control. How much the desire is the father of the thought here, to gain immunity and eradicate diseases, I can only guess, but I think this desire is exceedingly strong. I make no difference between "natural immunity" or artificially "acquired".

No one seems to listen to the fact that numerous counter-statements of contagion have been described in history and that human and animal experiments have failed to confirm that there is as much to the theory as is propagated and established. The root of this conviction, however, is so deep and so firmly anchored that it takes an event like this one to motivate people to question the whole thing. Which I did. Tracy from @active-truth has addressed this issue in various texts and I was grateful that she was able to name sources. However, I freely confess that even before these historical sources, I began to doubt the virus and contagion theory.

Which does not mean that I don't think that bacteria can have serious effects on our human bodies.

When I remember the times when I went dancing every weekend, in packed clubs, unhygienic toilets, where we stood sweating close to each other, walked and danced to the music, drank alcohol or took other things, how often was I sick afterwards? How often we drank from other people's glasses and bottles, I can't even count. When I think of the Love Parade in Berlin, of the unbelievable masses of people, of stadiums and festivals where people celebrated close together, couldn't one get the idea that these were all sources of epidemics? Yes, one could, as we can see now. I can't even remotely remember getting sick after such events, on the contrary, I was euphoric and inspired, even if I sometimes had a full-blown hangover afterwards.

If you ask me, we are sitting on a mass hysteria, hypnotised by these questions and can no longer live, love and act normally because all our thinking is concerned with the questions of this alleged epidemic. From my point of view, the harm has far undermined any postulated benefit.

I recognise an indirect benefit only to the extent that some effects of current policies may have a positive one on the environment. However, I can't really judge that. In any case, it has touched my own beliefs and I have since stopped believing in contagion to the extent that I did before. I think it is simply unhealthy and counterproductive in terms of social contacts to continue to believe in it.

Nor do I believe in "new and different viruses" that have been "discovered". From my point of view, human evolution knows nothing really absolutely new, because the planet and everything that exists on it is connected by past and present. If we humans were really so susceptible to diseases that occur, the mortality rates would be far more conspicuous and massive, we would definitely notice if everyone in our immediate environment became seriously ill or died.

I just don't understand how people keep looking at this mono-causality without also looking at the mental aspect, which shows us in so many examples that the influence of thoughts can also make people ill. Or healthy. I call this biologism, which reduces our complex existence only to the material and biological level without taking the spiritual and mental into account. The will to live or the tiredness of life are disregarded, although a practising doctor who has been caring for patients for decades should be able to tell us exactly how much it makes a difference in which strong mental constitution someone was who had suffered and recovered from a serious illness. Then, people cannot die, even if they seem to want to, for they are very old and sick but something keeps them alive. It may be that it is a desire to stay, that some issue still lingers in the heart and mind of this person, which remained unsolved.

How can we possibly be so arrogant as to have or demand clear answers on this? There are aspects of the human condition to which we lack answers and no experiment whatsoever can truly deliver them. For we are unable to take all the influences into account. We do not live in a petri dish.

I detest this era of "reductionism" towards the complexity of life.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

If I asked you to think more deeply about the contagion or virus theory and consider that it might be a false theory, what is your resistance to it?

It could be false. I don't have a particular resistance to it other than I've thought one way for a long time. That doesn't mean my mind has not been gradually changing (actually pretty rapidly because I've only been back here a few months).

I don't like absolutes. You know that by now. I can throw out part of a thing without assuming every aspect of a thing is without merit. Likewise just because something has one thing that has merit does not mean the entirety of the thing also has merit.

At the moment I haven't made up my mind RE: Virus. I tend to use virus interchangeably with the word illness when I speak at times.

Just like I have been trying to break myself of the use of the word believe for years and it has been a gradual process so too will it take me awhile to stop using the label virus if I decide there is nothing noteworthy to it.


In addition, if I ditch it completely then I cannot really discuss some things with people. So part of it will likely remain purely for communication purposes.

No one seems to listen to the fact that numerous counter-statements of contagion have been described in history and that human and animal experiments have failed to confirm that there is as much to the theory as is propagated and established. The root of this conviction, however, is so deep and so firmly anchored that it takes an event like this one to motivate people to question the whole thing. Which I did. Tracy from @active-truth has addressed this issue in various texts and I was grateful that she was able to name sources. However, I freely confess that even before these historical sources, I began to doubt the virus and contagion theory.

Yes, I follow her posts closely. She more than any other has done the most to make me start thinking about these things differently.

Changing a life time of thought is not an instantaneous thing. She has had years/decades to do it. I am a couple of months in since I encountered her writing.

That doesn't mean I will agree on every point completely. It also doesn't mean that I won't come to agree on every point.

It is too early to tell. My mind is toying around with new mental LEGO pieces.

Nor do I believe in "new and different viruses" that have been "discovered".

I'm trying really hard not to "believe" anything. :) That may sound extreme but basically someone convinced me a few years ago that belief is more of a dogma. I try to use the word "think" instead so as to have people realize I can change my mind. We can change beliefs but a lot of people get hung up on it. They see the word believe and they think it is an aspect of your new individual religion. Thus, I try really hard to say think. I still fail and say believe occasionally.

How can we possibly be so arrogant as to have or demand clear answers on this? There are aspects of the human condition to which we lack answers and no experiment whatsoever can truly deliver them. For we are unable to take all the influences into account. We do not live in a petri dish.

There are many topics. Making demands doesn't often achieve the desired goals of communication. Speaking many different ways and trying different approaches will reach more people. One approach might reach one group of people. Another approach a different group. Communication is hard. What works in one place may not work in another.

I try to switch up my approach. One thing I cannot switch off is my verbosity, my wordiness. I know people that are turned off by a lot of words will likely never be reached by me.

0
0
0.000
avatar

To be careful with ones speech makes sense. In the recent years I also tried to change my language and realize how hard it is to overcome old habits. Yes, it takes a long time to question ones own rooted convictions, standpoints, principles (or believes, as one may say:). That's the hardest thing to do.

Still, I would argue, there is always a rest of what one believes (or thinks), for it cannot be proven by neither "this or that". For me, it's a matter of fact, that we people indeed live in different worlds and how we perceive these worlds, can be of utmost controversies.

I agree that one needs to be able to communicate. In order to do that, the others persons language needs to be met in one way or the other. To think widely outside usual boxes it is a difficult path to walk, for the more outside it is, the less interfaces of communication can be found.

What I've learned throughout life is that the majority is not a reliable source.

Trust is a thing...

Thank you for taking the time to comment on my thoughts.

HaHa, same here. I use a lot of words, I find that sometimes bothering, even for myself. I need to work on it. lol

0
0
0.000
avatar

If I DO come to share @active-truth's views more closely which I am definitely a lot closer to that now than I was two months ago there are some things to note.

I don't see convincing a lot of people of anything like this as likely to work except for the most discerning of people if I constantly tell them what they are talking about doesn't make sense because viruses are not real.

I often like the concept of stepping stones.

I can talk to people about anything and that doesn't mean I agree with everything I am talking about. It is kind of like trying to find that middle ground.

Other times I fail at that miserably and beat them over the head with information after information (kind of like this particular post).

Different approaches at different times when my mood and thoughts are different.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thankyou erh. you're always so succinct and thorough and sometimes even epic. xx


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

:) Thanks, we are quite a pool of different people here, aren't we?
Epic in terms of the amount of words, I use. LOL

0
0
0.000
avatar

if we were all the same what a boring world it would be and yes epic amounts of words but all valuable and appreciated.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you had ever informed yourself properly or thought about it you would have known it from the beginning.

No c virus has been found or proven.
Never
Same with Aids,...
Same with the “variants”
Pcr test are not for diagnosis
Vaccines are not tested

The world is lying and i guess most of what u think is real is not. Feel free to read my blog or call me.

RonnysKochshow.berlin
img_8914.jpg

img_8916.jpg

img_8929.jpg

Watch “the fall of cabal” / “the sequel”

https://odysee.com/@DagnyTaggart:8/THE-SEQUEL-TO-THE-FALL-OF-THE-CABAL---PART-9:1?lid=4efe48b4ee8aacfb185b4fc86352a8bdb8fc7acb

The most intelligent German

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you had ever informed yourself properly or thought about it you would have known it from the beginning.

Hmmm... I didn't know I ever claimed to be a God or perfect...

I also don't refer to myself a genius.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No need to be perfect today. But never stop trying🤙🏾 you can always be better tomorrow.
Sorry i was a little pissed today because of all the terrorists.

Just eat healthy every day and work out every day and the world will be a better place.

There should be nothing more important to you than your health.

If mankind would follow this rule wr would live in paradise not babylon❣️

0
0
0.000
avatar

I also don't refer to myself a genius.

🤣👏🙌

Well, in all fairness, maybe you would if you had 'the highest IQ score out of anyone that's EVER been tested.'

0
0
0.000
avatar

I never put much stock into IQ scores. I've known a lot of people with very high IQs. I've also known people with low IQs. IQs didn't tend to define their worth to me. Sometimes they fit the stereotypes and often they did not.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I try not to call myself smart, wise, intelligent, genius, etc. I have been called all of those things a lot of times by OTHER people in my life. Sometimes I felt a little embarrassed as I personally think they are labels misused so often these days and often unwarranted. I will say that to me they only have merit when someone else says them. If my actions evoke such labels that is better than if I just decide to say those things are who I am.

I also get concerned because I've seen people in my life who do act as though the labels fit and sometimes (not always) it almost becomes a crutch and they miss things, don't put in the effort, and can be blinded to some things due to staring at their reflection in the puddle of water.

I don't plan to apply such labels to myself. I will apply them to other people though.

I personally consider some people that traditional IQ would indicate as being low intelligence to be particularly intelligent and wise just not in ways that are measured or captured by those tests.

And MENSA. I laugh at Mensa. I've known many people as members of that and yet to have met one I was actually impressed with. My wife uses things like their testing manuals as fun puzzle books to play with much like buying puzzle books at a convenience store.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

All well-said.

And I kinda admire the graceful diplomacy with which you approach this particular thread. Lol.

I also get concerned because I've seen people in my life who do act as though the labels fit and sometimes (not always) it almost becomes a crutch and they miss things, don't put in the effort, and can be blinded to some things due to staring at their reflection in the puddle of water

Very well put. And there’s probably a bit of the autistic “idiot-savant” dynamic at play in some of these cases too - excelling in some aspects while significantly impaired in others.

🥂

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe everyone can get the vaccine now which will definitely make the world happy and make things come back to normal


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great post...i like to keep things simple so here is my response...coronahoax is all bullshit, germ theory is bullshit too, and read agenda 2030!


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

glad to see you - if you are interested in hanging out with others from Colorado you can get on telegram and come to the We Are Change Colorado Open Mic nights in Wheat Ridge monthly. Blessings!

0
0
0.000
avatar

If I was staying in Colorado I'd consider it. I've paid attention to We Are Change since before the Colorado chapter was founded but I have never attended a meeting.

We are closing on selling our house on 9/1. I'll be moving to Missouri (not the city though).

Selling my house in Westminster and getting a larger house, with an additional guest house and 4 acres with a little extra to spare and prices for everything there are way less expensive.

Colorado is currently 7th most expensive state. Missouri is 10th least expensive.

Thanks for the offer. I wish you guys great success.

Maybe I'll find a chapter in Missouri but I have no intentions of hanging out in St. Louis or Kansas City. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh fantastic! I am so happy for you! I just drove through Missouri this summer and was thinking - it's beautiful and very backward in the sense that I prefer - just nice old stuff - I am envious of you in a way - although my boyfriend has property on the eastern plains and we are building our house out there slowly but surely - hoping to escape the extreme craziness... We Are Change and the Colorado Freeple Group and the Free World Family group are the peeps I will hang with till we get the heck outa Dodge. Good for you! Blessings!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well done dwinblood. Sorry I didn't get back to you I was unable to log in due to a keyboard malfunction. I just got it fixed today and saw your message but I'm happy that you have finally written something I totally agree with ;-) sadly it had to be because the wealth ranger told you so and not because of what I wrote over and over. I guess my job is done now, I can have a holiday or write about horticulture or art which is what I'd rather be doing. I just had to unravel a mess of a bad german translation on Lanka's latest piece. It might interest you as it goes even further than this, debunking genetics!!!! Get your teeth into that one next!
Great job dude.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't always agree with Mike Adams myself. I've disagreed with a lot of his stance on COVID for a long time now. The only time he was someone I paid attention to RE: COVID was in maybe December 2019 - February of 2020 when he was one of the few people talking actively about it before the CDC or WHO had said a thing.

Not long after that I didn't agree with all of his conclusions.

As to him convincing me. You did more than he did. Though I think it is important when someone that is advocating strongly in directions different from your own and well known at that it is important to NOTE when they change their mind.

That was truly the most important thing about him as he reaches a lot of minds.

Whether people agree 100% or not is never a goal of mine. I don't think it is yours either.

I am not 100% to your way of thinking yet because I haven't finished doing my own due diligence and thinking on the subject but I am a lot closer to it than I was we we began talking and reading each other's posts. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm humbled that you actually said that. It gives me incentive to keep going. Thankyou for the kind words. Not everyone will change but if enough do we can tip the scales. I actually think the whole system is changing anyway and it will be innevitable in the end. The old medical system is on it's way out. We will have a choice to go down the bio-tech merger route (bad) or the new biology route which is the route I'm plumping for.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nothing happens quickly. I also think there is a correlation between intelligence and stubbornness.

Others have often called me intelligent. I know I am stubborn.

I've observed that people I consider intelligent are stubborn as well.

We are used to people not thinking around us. Thus, we can get into a mode where we are quick to cast things aside that challenge our world view.

I have been trying to keep that aspect of myself more at bay. I think it needs to be there a little bit but not dogmatic like as it also keeps us from blindly accepting things we hear.

I also realized long ago that it is very rare for someone to immediately change their mind. It takes time.

The analogy in my mind is always that I am throwing mental seeds as I talk to people and they are throwing them back at me. Some seeds may never grow. Others may eventually sprout and do something. Perhaps not what you planned but they will lead to change.

0
0
0.000
avatar

oh I'm well aware of the 'planting seeds' strategy and have virtually done it for years, throw out a handful of seeds and run. I no longer fret about whether people listen or not I just post and let it brew. I gave up debating online and only answer genuine questions if I know the asker is open. I can spot a shill a mile off and never engage.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is the best thing. This is how you fight it.
https://rumble.com/embed/vi2ltq/?pub=4
Link

  1. Get a lawyer to get a list of COVID-style fines for you.
  2. Seek to get yourself fined by some Covid related edict.
  3. After fined challenge the ticket in court
  4. For evidence claim that you need to see the isolation of Covid-19 to defend your case. Explicitly exclude PCR psuedo-science
  5. When the state says they don't have the evidence, ask to get it on the record that they have no evidence for COVID-19.

It worked for Patrick King. Patrick King represented himself. Alberta has ended lockdown restrictions.
The government is totally unapologetic for what they have done, and are not mentioning King as the reason this happened. Would it have worked out even better if he had a good lawyer?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Interestingly, my daughter was saying she was going through some papers on the vaccine trials with her professor and there were lots omissions, but:

"The gist is that the vaccine isn't too crazy evil from what we know now, but from best guesses, it doesn't work. Like at all. Effects will last about 4-6 months then it's like nothing"

Anyway, aside from that I see the article that started your post is from Mike Adams and wondered whether you'd seen the video he made before all this kicked off, that basically warned it would kick off. I wish I'd saved it at the time, because I can't find it now, but the gist was that a virus would be released that was "dangerous", a vaccine would be created in record time and people would queue up for that vaccine. A worse disease would be in the vaccine and that would also spread to the unvaccinated. Pretty much laying it all out. I think I saw it in 2019 and hoped at the time it was a long way off in the future. I'd love to find it again.

0
0
0.000
avatar

image.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wish that was a bit less grainy. Wouldn't mind seeing the date on it. Also hoping it's not photoshopped.

0
0
0.000
avatar

image.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

So how's that freedom going for her?

0
0
0.000
avatar

There is a lady in NZ compiling a list of adverse reactions and deaths, interviewing a lot of sick people, and relatives of dead people - even in little NZ there are already a lot.

0
0
0.000
avatar

image.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can't help but think, if the elites are planning to be the only people left behind, the human race is going to be real ugly...

0
0
0.000
avatar

they do want a half millions slaves left

0
0
0.000
avatar

But most of the slaves are prettier than them!

0
0
0.000
avatar

they have the ugly maggot market fully covered!

image.png

0
0
0.000